Jump to content


Clan Wars Freeze on 21 August


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
19 replies to this topic

ContentWG #1 Posted 20 August 2013 - 06:50 PM

    Captain

  • Administrator
  • 0 battles
  • 1,593
  • Member since:
    06-20-2013
Clan Wars will be going offline starting on 21 August.

Full news text

SaltyMemeMan_CAMMA #2 Posted 20 August 2013 - 07:03 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 34175 battles
  • 2,020
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012
Is this due to the realisation that giving away free tanks with a minimum amount of victory points during the campaign is totally utterly awful and causes the dreaded....
superhappytreefriends[Content removed]goldfarming[Content removed]fatdolls alliance?
Inappropriate content. Content removed, user warned.
Please keep Clan Rivalry in CR/D.
~Mick42.

Eltnot #3 Posted 20 August 2013 - 07:07 PM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 22428 battles
  • 1,408
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-01-2012
Details about the changes?

Ryzil #4 Posted 20 August 2013 - 10:40 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 20001 battles
  • 940
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View Postcammaman, on 20 August 2013 - 07:03 PM, said:

Is this due to the realisation that giving away free tanks with a minimum amount of victory points during the campaign is totally utterly awful and causes the dreaded....
superhappytreefriends[Content removed]goldfarming[Contentremoved]fatdolls alliance?
Inappropriate content. Content removed, user warned.
Please keep Clan Rivalry in CR/D.
~Mick42.
AWWWW, did someone get butt hurt that they didn't get a M60? All I hear when people complain about this is "BUTT HURT BUTT HURT BUTT HURT".
Updating quote.
~Mick42.

Trying to see thing through your point of view, but I can't get my head that far up my butt.


Horseoftheapocalypse #5 Posted 21 August 2013 - 07:38 AM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16583 battles
  • 1,181
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012
FISH was the old AUS before their commander had a brain fart. That is why they are butt hurt

Edited by Horseoftheapocalypse, 21 August 2013 - 07:39 AM.


Ezz #6 Posted 21 August 2013 - 07:52 AM

    How many flipping posts do I need to get past Major?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 72951 battles
  • 36,638
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
Is there any info in what version 0.3.1 means for us?

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


LXX_ignis #7 Posted 21 August 2013 - 08:33 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 33679 battles
  • 7,761
  • Member since:
    05-01-2012

View PostEzz, on 21 August 2013 - 07:52 AM, said:

Is there any info in what version 0.3.1 means for us?

Just a Regional Stability™ update.

As long as you have heaps of friends near by you won't notice the changes..

Lost - 1 signature, last seen about 1 week ago.

Will come to the name Fireguard_.

Please PM me if you find it...


Eltnot #8 Posted 21 August 2013 - 09:24 AM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 22428 battles
  • 1,408
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-01-2012
The silence regarding what the update entails is deafening.  Good to see WG is on the ball and up to its usual standards with providing information about CW.

Ezz #9 Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:03 AM

    How many flipping posts do I need to get past Major?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 72951 battles
  • 36,638
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
Would be nice to have a rule set so we know stuff like - draw on an encounter counts as a loss to the team that started on the attacking side - in advance.

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


Bartlett #10 Posted 21 August 2013 - 11:30 AM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 21654 battles
  • 1,722
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
give it a few hours maybe ... if not then we'll hear about it after its removed because something got broken  :hiding:

The important question is are we guinea pigs or not?! (ie are the other servers also getting said patch).


Eltnot #11 Posted 21 August 2013 - 11:53 AM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 22428 battles
  • 1,408
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-01-2012
They should have all the information about it already.  If not, why are they applying it when they don't even know what is going on?  This greatly effects clans in the East who will have a very small window from when the maintenance completes to placing chips in time for battles.  They can't place chips now in good faith as they don't know what changes are being implemented.

Seriously WG get your act together.  You have been informed that the lack of information regarding CW has been pathetic, and time and again you apologise for the lack of information only to do the exact same thing the next time.

Bluedog77 #12 Posted 21 August 2013 - 02:53 PM

    Sergeant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 44821 battles
  • 179
  • [AUSE] AUSE
  • Member since:
    09-29-2012
yer WG a little more info would be good so we know what is really happening

Eltnot #13 Posted 21 August 2013 - 03:00 PM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 22428 battles
  • 1,408
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-01-2012
This was posted on their FB page.  Not really a decent response though.

Quote

WG Elphaba It's to fix some minor technical issues found and to make some functions more efficient.


Virtualgenius #14 Posted 21 August 2013 - 04:21 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16437 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012
Whats it being suspended for, WG have you ever heard of change management where you notify the stakeholders which are the players before you take it offline how about some notification or full disclosure on what your doing seriously who runs your IT department they need sacking as well as the media and marketing people for not putting out a media blurb

SaltyMemeMan_CAMMA #15 Posted 21 August 2013 - 04:58 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 34175 battles
  • 2,020
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostRyzil, on 20 August 2013 - 10:40 PM, said:

AWWWW, did someone get butt hurt that they didn't get a M60? All I hear when people complain about this is "BUTT HURT BUTT HURT BUTT HURT".
sorry for not playing tanks for 3 months while absolutely zero new tanks interested me and a useless campaign that made clan wars even worse was happening. I have enough tier 10's and the m60 doesn't offer anything new/different.. I like how that's the standard response everyone seems to give, it's sad, can't articulate anything useful to say so must cry 'butthurt'.. Enjoy your m60 and what little dignity your clan has left....

View PostHorseoftheapocalypse, on 21 August 2013 - 07:38 AM, said:

FISH was the old AUS before their commander had a brain fart. That is why they are butt hurt
That whole sentence doesn't make sense, read it again and fix it. Wasn't even playing when it happened but I know for a fact that the main reason was because most of the leadership could not be bothered with a large clan anymore, hence the kicking and hence the relatively small numbers in fish. but hey you come to your own conclusions with out talking to people who actually know things, good for you man, good for you.

Edited by cammaman, 21 August 2013 - 04:58 PM.


SaltyMemeMan_CAMMA #16 Posted 21 August 2013 - 05:03 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 34175 battles
  • 2,020
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012
Oh and hey mick, what I said isn't allowed, but typing the term butthurt repeatedly is, hmm ok..interesting....

wasaabi #17 Posted 21 August 2013 - 07:23 PM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 22922 battles
  • 6,879
  • [KINGS] KINGS
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View Postcammaman, on 21 August 2013 - 04:58 PM, said:

That whole sentence doesn't make sense, read it again and fix it. Wasn't even playing when it happened but I know for a fact that the main reason was because most of the leadership could not be bothered with a large clan anymore, hence the kicking and hence the relatively small numbers in fish. but hey you come to your own conclusions with out talking to people who actually know things, good for you man, good for you.

Talk to Cheese and get the truth camma, find out what Tuck did and why so many ex-AUS players are now in other clans and why AUS2 changed its name so it wouldn't be associated with the AUS name.

 

 

 

 

 WoT ANZ Community Contributor http://www.youtube.com/c/BadTanking


surya951 #18 Posted 22 August 2013 - 08:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 25693 battles
  • 32
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    12-03-2012
dammed !! long wait !!
back online yet !!
4XX error not found !!
~~
just tell me when will it be back up

SaltyMemeMan_CAMMA #19 Posted 22 August 2013 - 09:17 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 34175 battles
  • 2,020
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View Postwasaabi, on 21 August 2013 - 07:23 PM, said:

Talk to Cheese and get the truth camma, find out what Tuck did and why so many ex-AUS players are now in other clans and why AUS2 changed its name so it wouldn't be associated with the AUS name.

Coming from a player who played CW once a month... That's about. The amount of matches you play per month for SMP a year I'm guessing..?

I know the whole story. Sorry for only pointing out the original reason to prove a dumb scrub wrong and not posting the entire life story of AUS & 2, honestly, who's going to read it in here.

Talk to cheese? I talk to everyone. Same story. Do you understand how difficult it is listening to 99 players comments about strats, chip movements and my personal favourite "what time is clan wars" etc etc.. I would've disbanded the clan after a week.

Come at me wasaabi, maybe if you put in as much time as the rest of us you would have a clue..

wasaabi #20 Posted 23 August 2013 - 08:11 AM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 22922 battles
  • 6,879
  • [KINGS] KINGS
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View Postcammaman, on 22 August 2013 - 09:17 PM, said:

Coming from a player who played CW once a month... That's about. The amount of matches you play per month for SMP a year I'm guessing..?

Well, it was probably once a week, but then AUS had that whole 'A Team' thing going so well.

View Postcammaman, on 22 August 2013 - 09:17 PM, said:

Talk to cheese? I talk to everyone. Same story. Do you understand how difficult it is listening to 99 players comments about strats, chip movements and my personal favourite "what time is clan wars" etc etc.. I would've disbanded the clan after a week.

I'm sure, don't take this as a complaint, I'm sure they had their reasons, but a simple explanation would have gone a long way.

View Postcammaman, on 22 August 2013 - 09:17 PM, said:

Come at me wasaabi, maybe if you put in as much time as the rest of us you would have a clue..

Oh mate, I am a scrub, no two ways about that.  Searching for clues will take the rest of my life.

 

 

 

 

 WoT ANZ Community Contributor http://www.youtube.com/c/BadTanking





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users