Jump to content


Evolution of World of Tanks: Summer 2012 - Autumn 2013


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
31 replies to this topic

Revenants #21 Posted 24 September 2013 - 05:35 PM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 10840 battles
  • 1,527
  • [ATB] ATB
  • Member since:
    06-26-2012
All very good info but still having payed for camo you would think you would have the camo appear in battle .

“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” Thomas A. Edison


mantaray0102 #22 Posted 24 September 2013 - 08:38 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 4263 battles
  • 425
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostfapFAC3, on 24 September 2013 - 08:02 AM, said:

WG,

One suggestion for the future enhancement. In Asia, multiple languages are spoken and English is not the mother tougue at many countries. for people from some countries, they are unable to chat in English. Many times in random battle, you would see chat in languages that are alien to other members of the team. For a game that relies a significant part on communication and team work, this is a set back.

Suggestion - Give option to user to select country specific language to join the random battle. random battle can then be formed according to this option. Example if Philippines is selected, then all Pinoy players can be placed in the same random battle. they can go talk the Tagalog. this will certainly take the agony from the AUS and NZ players. For your kind consideration.

I don't know, but if majority of the sea players chose english, I'll be fine with it  :playing: . But it'll cause a lot of agony for those who chose specific language battles; never able to be sorted into a battle. We don't exactly have the number of players for that kind of matchmaking like RU does.
Panzers are a protected species under the WWF
PROTECT THE PANZERS!!!

mux2000 #23 Posted 25 September 2013 - 12:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 54162 battles
  • 212
  • [INAT] INAT
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013
For The past  was great  For next step  want more new maps ,and new tanks if possible no need change for old tank  like T50-2  T50   Super  pershing (good for welcome new tanks it make player active to find  how to  play it is charm of this game ,old good tank just one of collections ,in fact>> believe me )

sabang1994 #24 Posted 25 September 2013 - 12:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta-Tester
  • 13163 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    07-04-2012
old computers will be useless, and even average pc will struggle with the new graphics, maps, more vehichles, game mechanics, and others that consumes alot of RAM,

Ottomatic_Reiffel #25 Posted 25 September 2013 - 01:49 PM

    SealClub Number 6

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24192 battles
  • 4,246
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View Postsabang1994, on 25 September 2013 - 12:36 PM, said:

old computers will be useless, and even average pc will struggle with the new graphics, maps, more vehichles, game mechanics, and others that consumes alot of RAM,
Depends on what you consider to be average. It's surprising what systems this game can run on, and also that people are still willing to play under those conditions.

See no bots, hear no bots, speak not about bots

WoT's most dedicated players


hunterkiller96 #26 Posted 26 September 2013 - 12:05 AM

    Private

  • Beta-Tester
  • 7955 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    05-18-2012
I think Wargaming need to think about his rival the War Thunder, although the Wargaming have many players around the world than the War thunder, Wargaming can lost it popularity to it rival, i hope it not ganna be happen but nothing is  impossible. I suggest Wargaming add few more battle mode such as historical battle and battle between nation.
(sorry, i know my engilsh is suck) :hiding:

Fronturlauber #27 Posted 27 September 2013 - 04:17 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 6741 battles
  • 59
  • Member since:
    10-16-2012
I do not care about new tanks or cosmetics in the game, foremost put your server technology to the latest standard and give us the freedom of server roaming. Being tied to a local server (US, EU, SEA) feels outdated like being forced to use MS-DOS 6.2! C'mon, there must be enough ressources and what Gaijin can do, Wargaming can do it better, isn't it?

AALG #28 Posted 28 September 2013 - 05:31 AM

    Minsk Hitman

  • Senior Moderator
  • 20054 battles
  • 1,989
  • [PANZA] PANZA
  • Member since:
    09-29-2012

View Postsabang1994, on 25 September 2013 - 12:36 PM, said:

old computers will be useless, and even average pc will struggle with the new graphics, maps, more vehichles, game mechanics, and others that consumes alot of RAM,
My computer system is from 2008. Thats pretty long in the tooth, tech wise. Yet I run WoT with the updated render, and all settings at max, except postprocessing, at 60-75 FPS in game. When frapsing replays for the videos I make for the clan I belong to and my own youtube channels (shameless plug : My channel : http://www.youtube.com/user/DutchDK63 - And the Panzac clans channel : http://www.youtube.com/user/TrozOz ), it still runs at 25-30 fps, dispite the huge overhead Fraps has when capturing and encoding. So don't tell me that you need the latest greatest hardware to run WoT. Thats just plain not true.

My system specs : Core2Duo E8400 3 Ghz CPU. Asus P5E64-WS motherboard, 8 GB DDR3 Ram, An AMD Radeon HD 5750 Graphics card x-fired with an ATI Radeon HD 6750 (same as the 5750, just with updated support for bluray and DVD movie decoding).

All of the items are technology which was released way back in 2008.
All of the components were scrounged from office pc's that were getting replaced, then used to build the game PC for WoT. Only items purchased for the PC were the Kuhler H2O 920 CPU cooler, and the 4x1 GB harddisks. Total outlay here in Denmark (25 % VAT on all items, and prices on hardware are high allready here), less than 2000 Dkr ~ 360 USD/390 AUD/15750PHP/4115200 IDR.

Pretty cheap, and still good enough for the current WoT, and the future announced improvements.

  
I am ArmsAndLegsGuy from the EU and NA server, with a shortened name here.
(battle stats in the spoiler from the servers I have played on)

Spoiler

Politx_killer #29 Posted 28 September 2013 - 10:42 AM

    Loard of Luck™

  • Beta-Tester
  • 43540 battles
  • 6,916
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    09-19-2012
Well WoT will have competition in the Tank market as Groundforces are not that far away for WT. tbh I'd rather go back to pre 7.xx when people actually knew how to play. Now it's rush to tier 10 and ruin high tier gameplay z

Forever duelling with pistols for Reaps hat collection.

Also just for Feet


Whooohooo #30 Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:08 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 15389 battles
  • 3,167
  • [TROLL] TROLL
  • Member since:
    08-13-2012
Need moar us td prem

my sig also got HD buff ?


Lornitz #31 Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:45 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 25452 battles
  • 3,243
  • Member since:
    08-06-2012

View PostFronturlauber, on 27 September 2013 - 04:17 PM, said:

I do not care about new tanks or cosmetics in the game, foremost put your server technology to the latest standard and give us the freedom of server roaming. Being tied to a local server (US, EU, SEA) feels outdated like being forced to use MS-DOS 6.2! C'mon, there must be enough ressources and what Gaijin can do, Wargaming can do it better, isn't it?

You are mentioning the other developer eh? WG loves her nemesis. LOL
Because one does not die when he is killed. One dies when he is forgotten. That's why we will live forever as a legend

Popgunn #32 Posted 10 October 2013 - 01:41 PM

    Private

  • Beta-Tester
  • 18785 battles
  • 1
  • [LUBE] LUBE
  • Member since:
    09-18-2012
I would like WG to put some time into improving their Match Maker program....not all this other fluff....




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users