Jump to content


Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: Matilda II


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
9 replies to this topic

The_Chieftain #1 Posted 22 January 2014 - 12:53 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Military Specialist
  • 0 battles
  • 360
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

This will be a four-parter. (This is the shortest of the four)

 

 

Part 2. Complete with evidence of illegal narcotics use.

 



t30a #2 Posted 22 January 2014 - 03:16 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 1094 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-24-2013
The twin smoke projectors is interesting,, wonder if we'll ever see that in WoT.

Death2846 #3 Posted 22 January 2014 - 04:55 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 21279 battles
  • 2,994
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View Postt30a, on 22 January 2014 - 08:16 AM, said:

The twin smoke projectors is interesting,, wonder if we'll ever see that in WoT.

 

Maybe with the new physics engine. If they added smoke in WoT with the current engine... things would get very hard to play.



WhatsThatSmell #4 Posted 22 January 2014 - 05:50 AM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16032 battles
  • 1,830
  • Member since:
    09-24-2012
Awesome, cant wait for the next episodes


Artemisinin #5 Posted 22 January 2014 - 06:54 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 10060 battles
  • 600
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012

View PostDeath2846, on 22 January 2014 - 06:55 AM, said:

 

Maybe with the new physics engine. If they added smoke in WoT with the current engine... things would get very hard to play.

 

I don't see why the change in physics engine would effect something that is purely a particle effect. Unless Havok changes buildings to particles.




When the syringe doesn't work, use the sledgehammer.


DanLBob #6 Posted 22 January 2014 - 07:27 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 30051 battles
  • 3,224
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

Thanks Chieftain,interesting as always. Looking forward to the rest of the series and the further Firefly installments. Finally something interesting and informative on the forums.

 

DanJar



FryaDuck #7 Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:48 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 17791 battles
  • 362
  • [FH] FH
  • Member since:
    07-28-2012
Would be nice if you completed the 704..

The_Chieftain #8 Posted 05 February 2014 - 02:20 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Military Specialist
  • 0 battles
  • 360
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012
Added Part 3.

FryaDuck #9 Posted 12 February 2014 - 03:26 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 17791 battles
  • 362
  • [FH] FH
  • Member since:
    07-28-2012

Could you please assist WG in correcting the error that the Matilda II is a medium tank. The Matilda II is an Infantry tank the same as the Churchill;

 

http://worldoftanks....h-matilda-pt-4/

 

WGs definitions are not correct.



karl0ssus1 #10 Posted 12 February 2014 - 03:30 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 25141 battles
  • 7,250
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    12-16-2012
Not again... Fry, WG are using their internal system for classifying tanks, you know, the same one we use in game? Its intentionally kept simple so it wont overwhelm the people who dont give quite so many damns about exactly what the designation of a tank is. Those that do give enough damns, will either already know, or will find out from the video.

RIP DM, 2012~2014 





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users