Jump to content


Here is a tier 10 artillery and airstrike from SH battle.

lulzy but not really whodafukmadethismechanic SerB broken

  • Please log in to reply
59 replies to this topic

timwahoo #41 Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:30 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 72619 battles
  • 5,913
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012
Actually defending SVNs record in stronks, as well as the airstrike mechanic

Now ive seen every kind of wot fanboyism here

Edited by timwahoo, 05 March 2015 - 12:31 PM.

SOLOPUBE. 3 MoE: T54E1, Lowe, FV4202, M46KR, IS-2, AMX M4 45, FV201, Panther M10, ARL 44, Heavy Tank VI, VK 30.01 D, Excelsior, Renault G1R, ELC


_stevethegecko_ #42 Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:34 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 29350 battles
  • 13,193
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View Postcommie, on 05 March 2015 - 03:25 PM, said:

I assume you guys switched from topic to SVN discussions. I didn't see any proof of their rigged battles, however, they do show up for fights, they aren't scared to fight back and they don't have their defense set at some ridiculous time like 80% of clans. And they don't have a level 10 arty or airstrike... yet. 

 

Back to topic, this feature is really useful at high levels (8 plus), especially against heavy turtling, fast setups aren't that vulnerable.. But since almost no clans are willing to work on their strongholds upgrades to benefit from them in the future majority will only keep whining when CNC or CHE or SVN will use it on them :)

 

SVA 95%, their sub-clan 5%. How is that not exploitation?

 

Edit: Wrong clan name.


Edited by FeeTFooD, 05 March 2015 - 12:40 PM.

kilig ako


commie #43 Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:35 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 19301 battles
  • 547
  • [STAL] STAL
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012
Wrong. I'm not defending anything, just haven't seen any evidence of supposed rigging, only empty talk.

My Youtube channel news, reviews, mods, positions and much more


commie #44 Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:36 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 19301 battles
  • 547
  • [STAL] STAL
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012

View PostFeeTFooD, on 05 March 2015 - 11:34 AM, said:

 

SVN 95%, their sub-clan 5%. How is that not exploitation?

 

Possibility but not a solid proof. Plenty of horrible clans out there with 3-5% winrate.

 

Edited: And having fought SVN 6 times last week alone they are pretty solid competition to medium skilled clans, scrubs shouldn't be a problem for them.


Edited by commie, 05 March 2015 - 12:38 PM.

My Youtube channel news, reviews, mods, positions and much more


_stevethegecko_ #45 Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:42 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 29350 battles
  • 13,193
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012
We fought them a few times and it was fairly even. But to have 95% wins on Stronghold Defense (not skirmishes) with 5% on their sub-clan, allegations were raised. WG looked into the logs and obviously saw an inordinate amount of battles between the main and sub and both clans got punished. WE didn't see the proof, but WG definately did.

kilig ako


commie #46 Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:53 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 19301 battles
  • 547
  • [STAL] STAL
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012

View PostFeeTFooD, on 05 March 2015 - 11:42 AM, said:

We fought them a few times and it was fairly even. But to have 95% wins on Stronghold Defense (not skirmishes) with 5% on their sub-clan, allegations were raised. WG looked into the logs and obviously saw an inordinate amount of battles between the main and sub and both clans got punished. WE didn't see the proof, but WG definately did.

 

Oh so there actually was an issue followed by action from WG... I didn't know that, thanks for correction. But then I just searched for SVN-A and didn't find it, was it nuked? How could they possibly rig 95% of defense battles (again, I tried to search and couldn't find this data, only skirmish stats) against their sub clan? You can only do 1 attack per week, how many battles did they have? And you get only 1400 resource from a succsessful attack on level 5 SH, which is peanuts when you consider cost of level8+ buildings. 

My Youtube channel news, reviews, mods, positions and much more


timwahoo #47 Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:55 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 72619 battles
  • 5,913
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012
zzz or maybe they just farmin credits.

Its still another rort going on in plain sight of admin if only theyd look at a statistic or 2

SOLOPUBE. 3 MoE: T54E1, Lowe, FV4202, M46KR, IS-2, AMX M4 45, FV201, Panther M10, ARL 44, Heavy Tank VI, VK 30.01 D, Excelsior, Renault G1R, ELC


_stevethegecko_ #48 Posted 05 March 2015 - 01:24 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 29350 battles
  • 13,193
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View Postcommie, on 05 March 2015 - 03:53 PM, said:

 

Oh so there actually was an issue followed by action from WG... I didn't know that, thanks for correction. But then I just searched for SVN-A and didn't find it, was it nuked? How could they possibly rig 95% of defense battles (again, I tried to search and couldn't find this data, only skirmish stats) against their sub clan? You can only do 1 attack per week, how many battles did they have? And you get only 1400 resource from a succsessful attack on level 5 SH, which is peanuts when you consider cost of level8+ buildings. 

http://forum.worldof...25#entry1285625


kilig ako


commie #49 Posted 05 March 2015 - 01:33 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 19301 battles
  • 547
  • [STAL] STAL
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012

View PostFeeTFooD, on 05 March 2015 - 12:24 PM, said:

 

It says both clans were nuked however SVN still exists. Not them?

 

UPD: Didn't realise it was posted just now.


Edited by commie, 05 March 2015 - 01:35 PM.

My Youtube channel news, reviews, mods, positions and much more


Odessus #50 Posted 05 March 2015 - 03:05 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 9559 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012
It says later today - probably not yet.

commie #51 Posted 05 March 2015 - 07:57 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 19301 battles
  • 547
  • [STAL] STAL
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012
Since SVN still remains intact I assume it's some other clans. 

My Youtube channel news, reviews, mods, positions and much more


cactus351 #52 Posted 05 March 2015 - 08:03 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 3006 battles
  • 890
  • Member since:
    09-08-2014

View Postcommie, on 05 March 2015 - 11:57 AM, said:

Since SVN still remains intact I assume it's some other clans. 

 

http://forum.worldof...15#entry1286015

IF YOUR READING THIS, YOUR ARE THE REZZISTANCE


Hackurai #53 Posted 06 March 2015 - 11:43 AM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 579 battles
  • 184
  • [DPS] DPS
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013

thats my t10 bombers and arty (otter not dps)

 

you can use them once each per battle at 750 boxes each per battle

both have a 5 sec delay

neither have a warning, though you do hear the bombers coming a few secs in advance

launched by the commander

can't use bombers in the first 90 secs

can't use arty in the first 120 secs

cant use them after the detachment commander dies


Edited by Hackurai, 06 March 2015 - 11:43 AM.


neokai #54 Posted 06 March 2015 - 06:43 PM

    hunts pixels from red line

  • Member
  • 41355 battles
  • 8,421
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View PostNaharArkwing, on 04 March 2015 - 02:52 PM, said:

Holy mother of......

 

Dayyum... thats gonna leave quite a scar...

 

That definitely counts as a significant emotional event, to quote the Chieftain.

 

View PostHackurai, on 06 March 2015 - 11:43 AM, said:

thats my t10 bombers and arty (otter not dps)

 

you can use them once each per battle at 750 boxes each per battle

both have a 5 sec delay

neither have a warning, though you do hear the bombers coming a few secs in advance

launched by the commander

can't use bombers in the first 90 secs

can't use arty in the first 120 secs

cant use them after the detachment commander dies

 

Are detachment commander tanks marked? :)
Spoiler

Fear_the_Reaper #55 Posted 06 March 2015 - 08:40 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 7304 battles
  • 363
  • [-MER-] -MER-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2014
Imo it all seems to do a little bit too much dmg.

mttspiii #56 Posted 06 March 2015 - 09:49 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 33358 battles
  • 17,165
  • [PVP] PVP
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012
Would love to see that with the Battle Assistant mod.

I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 

 


timwahoo #57 Posted 07 March 2015 - 06:22 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 72619 battles
  • 5,913
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

View PostFear_the_Reaper, on 07 March 2015 - 12:40 AM, said:

Imo it all seems to do a little bit too much dmg.

What u mean - only 7000+


SOLOPUBE. 3 MoE: T54E1, Lowe, FV4202, M46KR, IS-2, AMX M4 45, FV201, Panther M10, ARL 44, Heavy Tank VI, VK 30.01 D, Excelsior, Renault G1R, ELC


anonym_YjmjLeoW3i0I #58 Posted 08 March 2015 - 07:24 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 2,650
  • Member since:
    11-28-2018
I noticed that two of the tanks in the clip are marked with a pale blue asterisk whilst the others have green - what does that mean?

Also, what is shown in the clip - is that all standard out of the box UI stuff or is some of it visually enhanced by mods (such as the asterisk)?

_Storm #59 Posted 08 March 2015 - 03:19 PM

    Ordo Hereticus

  • Member
  • 15005 battles
  • 5,588
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-06-2013

View Postcommie, on 05 March 2015 - 03:36 PM, said:

 

Possibility but not a solid proof. Plenty of horrible clans out there with 3-5% winrate.

And very few with 6000 games played.



Hackurai #60 Posted 09 March 2015 - 06:09 AM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 579 battles
  • 184
  • [DPS] DPS
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013

View PostAdrianK, on 07 March 2015 - 11:24 PM, said:

I noticed that two of the tanks in the clip are marked with a pale blue asterisk whilst the others have green - what does that mean?
Also, what is shown in the clip - is that all standard out of the box UI stuff or is some of it visually enhanced by mods (such as the asterisk)?

 

Thats XVM mod marking the players with a coloured star representing their overall WN8.

 

There is no marker for the detachment commander.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users