Jump to content


Armageddon - Day 1


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
50 replies to this topic

600 #1 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 16014 battles
  • 36
  • [CLASS] CLASS
  • Member since:
    12-06-2012

And already -

 

Spoiler

 

 



getside00 #2 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:35 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 21071 battles
  • 394
  • [PVP] PVP
  • Member since:
    07-24-2012
Wait for the last update tomorrow 2 am SGT.

ZeroPauper #3 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:38 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8691 battles
  • 3,013
  • Member since:
    09-11-2012
The top 3 places has more than 2x the FP than the next runner up clan? I smell BS.

Edited by ZeroPauper, 09 June 2015 - 05:39 PM.

When things fail, a good leader would look back at all his actions and try to figure out what went wrong to solve the problem and a lousy leader will start to make excuses and look for people to blame. Which are you?


ZeroPauper #4 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:46 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8691 battles
  • 3,013
  • Member since:
    09-11-2012

Can someone explain to me how they got 60k fame points while the other 9 clans in the top 10 aren't even close?

 

<a href='http://i.imgur.com/p1aXNYd.png' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://i.imgur.com/p1aXNYd.png</a>


When things fail, a good leader would look back at all his actions and try to figure out what went wrong to solve the problem and a lousy leader will start to make excuses and look for people to blame. Which are you?


aurora97 #5 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:51 PM

    Major

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 32465 battles
  • 2,193
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

View PostZeroPauper, on 09 June 2015 - 05:46 PM, said:

Can someone explain to me how they got 60k fame points while the other 9 clans in the top 10 aren't even close?

 

<a href='http://i.imgur.com/p1aXNYd.png' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://i.imgur.com/p1aXNYd.png</a>

Coz they completed a task. New feature.



ZeroPauper #6 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:54 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8691 battles
  • 3,013
  • Member since:
    09-11-2012

View Postaurora97, on 09 June 2015 - 05:51 PM, said:

Coz they completed a task. New feature.

 

I just read about the "control center" quest. What's the objective of the quest?

When things fail, a good leader would look back at all his actions and try to figure out what went wrong to solve the problem and a lousy leader will start to make excuses and look for people to blame. Which are you?


Napalmer #7 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:56 PM

    Objectionable Individual

  • Community Contributor
  • 43645 battles
  • 2,580
  • [CZARS] CZARS
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012

50, 000 for completing the mission of capturing the desired province.

 

And keep in mind, this is without the other time-zones having a go yet - to early to call out nautical allusions...

 

Napalmer.


3-Marked Tanks: Chaffee, T37, AMX 12T, Cromwell, Skoda T25, SU-100, WZ-131G FT, IS-3, T-54, T-10, T57 Heavy, Object 140IS-7

Signature 

The smell of Napalm...                           


aurora97 #8 Posted 09 June 2015 - 05:59 PM

    Major

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 32465 battles
  • 2,193
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

capture a a designated province and earn 50k FP , randomly assigned by system based on prime time.

 

A side note, still too early to judge. For best result wait till the fifth day, when data is actually more complete.

 

That's when clans start to migrate to new Swabia.



neokai #9 Posted 09 June 2015 - 06:01 PM

    hunts pixels from red line

  • Senior Moderator
  • 38940 battles
  • 8,201
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View PostNapalmer, on 09 June 2015 - 05:56 PM, said:

50, 000 for completing the mission of capturing the desired province.

 

And keep in mind, this is without the other time-zones having a go yet - to early to call out nautical allusions...

 

Napalmer.

 

^ This. Look at the breakdown - 10k from battle/s, 50k from objectives.
Spoiler

ZeroPauper #10 Posted 09 June 2015 - 06:16 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8691 battles
  • 3,013
  • Member since:
    09-11-2012
Will be looking forward to the news flash at 2am SGT :P

When things fail, a good leader would look back at all his actions and try to figure out what went wrong to solve the problem and a lousy leader will start to make excuses and look for people to blame. Which are you?


wasaabi #11 Posted 09 June 2015 - 07:56 PM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 21523 battles
  • 6,472
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

Just a reminder, any derogatory terms based on race or nationality no matter how slim, implied or inferred will be sanctioned.

 

~Wasaabi


The Dude abides.

 
Spoiler

 


Tachikoma_EXP #12 Posted 09 June 2015 - 08:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 103732 battles
  • 215
  • [YUKI_] YUKI_
  • Member since:
    09-21-2013

I can not open this page

http://worldoftanks..../maps/eventmap/

:angry:

The access to a site was convalescent 15 minutes later.


Edited by Tachikoma_EXP, 10 June 2015 - 02:12 AM.


aurora97 #13 Posted 10 June 2015 - 10:33 AM

    Major

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 32465 battles
  • 2,193
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012
Almost choked on my morning coffee when I saw the number of clans allegedly flouting the rules.... Its really an eye opener.

FendaIton #14 Posted 10 June 2015 - 11:13 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 62 battles
  • 98
  • [PANZX] PANZX
  • Member since:
    04-10-2014

View Postaurora97, on 10 June 2015 - 02:33 PM, said:

Almost choked on my morning coffee when I saw the number of clans allegedly flouting the rules.... Its really an eye opener.

 

It's great, I love all the clans getting wrecked, it should be like this from now on. 

 

Would be even better if the reports were automated, or we didn't have to report it ourselves and the game did for us. 



aurora97 #15 Posted 10 June 2015 - 11:44 AM

    Major

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 32465 battles
  • 2,193
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

View PostFendaIton, on 10 June 2015 - 11:13 AM, said:

 

It's great, I love all the clans getting wrecked, it should be like this from now on. 

 

Would be even better if the reports were automated, or we didn't have to report it ourselves and the game did for us. 

One baby step at a time, I think Tan has already put the fear if Tan in many of us...

 

Complaints are already coming in like twitter feed.

 

I think the current enforcement on day 1 of Armageddon is definitely a new high note for WG but the question ultimately can this continue on day 10th, 100th or even indefinitely, is it sustainable?

 

Automated enforcement (next complaint would probably your system is too darn rigid!)  will have to come in sooner or later, since manual labour is just too laborious and at some point prone to error. I can imagine WG staff attending to complaints as though it was a chess board game. Each complaint is required to be resolved in a chess clock fashion, delay may imply miscarriage of justice.

 

Perhaps we are merely enjoying a pseudo-renaisance towards a fairer gaming experience or is it done to appease the crowd that's armed with pitch forks and torches? I hope the former is true... Answers can be found in post-armageddon, when survivors of the purge start to re-appear and we rebuild our lives.

 

As much as I like the idea of community policing, which builds bond between dev and end user alike, we still come to a point whereby gamers should worry less about enforcement and focus more in putting in their time into the game....

 

 

 

 



hate_pubbehs #16 Posted 10 June 2015 - 11:56 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 68089 battles
  • 5,913
  • [TROLL] TROLL
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

View Postaurora97, on 10 June 2015 - 02:33 PM, said:

Almost choked on my morning coffee when I saw the number of clans allegedly flouting the rules.... Its really an eye opener.

And you wondered why some of us old-schoolers who love the game were negative about things?

 

You have to be a ranter sometimes to get  nice things...

 

These developments are great, they need to be maintained, automated, and improved upon over time.


SOLOPUBE. 3 MoE: T54E1, Lowe, FV4202, M46KR, IS-2, AMX M4 45, FV201, Panther M10, ARL 44, Heavy Tank VI, VK 30.01 D, Excelsior, Renault G1R, ELC


aurora97 #17 Posted 10 June 2015 - 12:17 PM

    Major

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 32465 battles
  • 2,193
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

View Posttimwahoo, on 10 June 2015 - 11:56 AM, said:

And you wondered why some of us old-schoolers who love the game were negative about things?

 

You have to be a ranter sometimes to get  nice things...

 

These developments are great, they need to be maintained, automated, and improved upon over time.

 

Don't get me wrong though, most of the latest infringements were related with previously deemed as unethical behaviours I.e. not appearing or appearing with insufficient tanks, which has now been outlawed. 

 

As I see it, these r merely teething issues.

 

The real mc coy is still out there.

 


Edited by aurora97, 10 June 2015 - 12:27 PM.


ZeroPauper #18 Posted 10 June 2015 - 01:29 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8691 battles
  • 3,013
  • Member since:
    09-11-2012

View Postaurora97, on 10 June 2015 - 10:33 AM, said:

Almost choked on my morning coffee when I saw the number of clans allegedly flouting the rules.... Its really an eye opener.

Do you still think cheating(or breaking the rules) is a moot point? Do you realise now why the various forum warriors had complaints about the "rules" even before they started?

 

These are only the surface of the things that are happening, the things that can be reported will be reported, but things like rigging may still be happening behind our backs with no one to detect or report them.


When things fail, a good leader would look back at all his actions and try to figure out what went wrong to solve the problem and a lousy leader will start to make excuses and look for people to blame. Which are you?


Irrelevant_Saffe #19 Posted 10 June 2015 - 01:33 PM

    Master flipper !

  • Live Streamer
  • 36207 battles
  • 3,576
  • Member since:
    12-18-2013

I just find it amusing how scrub clans puts a obvious alt (4 games) as clan leader.

Some people simply dont have any morals....


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
 
 
 
"You guys run around in t10 tanks with, prem consumables, prem rounds, prem crews and even prem modules and that is not fair on the newbies in t8, how do you expect the server to survive if this is what they get from your clan. Some of us want this server to survive."
FeelsBirthday

ZeroPauper #20 Posted 10 June 2015 - 01:38 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8691 battles
  • 3,013
  • Member since:
    09-11-2012

View PostSaffee, on 10 June 2015 - 01:33 PM, said:

I just find it amusing how scrub clans puts a obvious alt (4 games) as clan leader.

Some people simply dont have any morals....

Or brains for that matter. God knows how many other clans are rigging this under our nose, but we can't do anything about them.


When things fail, a good leader would look back at all his actions and try to figure out what went wrong to solve the problem and a lousy leader will start to make excuses and look for people to blame. Which are you?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users