Jump to content


Tank Facts: O-I


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
12 replies to this topic

WGNews #1 Posted 08 September 2015 - 06:09 PM

    Major

  • Administrator
  • 0 battles
  • 5,178
  • Member since:
    03-14-2012
The newest Tier VI Japanese heavy tank boasts impressively thick armour and a huge gun to boot, but how does it fare in a World of Tanks battle? Find out here!

Full news text


TsarAlexanders #2 Posted 09 September 2015 - 02:33 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 20227 battles
  • 33
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013

we call it [edited]fake fantasy tank

 

"It's no surprise that this Japanese tank has an impressive armor protection" really? and why murican just put m4 sherman on this front? since m4 sherman is poor on europe frontline. we call it historical accurate now????

 

call me TsarAlexander the most wanted elite911 shutdown person



BIGSHOTT #3 Posted 09 September 2015 - 06:40 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 1144 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015

View PostWGNews, on 08 September 2015 - 06:09 PM, said:

The newest Tier VI Japanese heavy tank boasts impressively thick armour and a huge gun to boot, but how does it fare in a World of Tanks battle? Find out here!
<a href="http://worldoftanks.asia/en/news/pc-browser/21/tank-facts-o-i/">Full news text</a>

 

active mm is the reason I have had 9 accounts in frustration, tank locking is the reason I no longer aspire to play clan wars again, bringing in new game modes to stuff up the good play we had in tank companies was ridiculous, and seriously these new tanks are ridiculous, I'm not happy you put them in our battles.

 

On the positive the map improvements are great, keep them coming.


 



radius02 #4 Posted 09 September 2015 - 09:20 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 18094 battles
  • 13
  • [PH-B] PH-B
  • Member since:
    02-20-2013
This thing actually is OVER POWERED as i can see :(

Metal_illness #5 Posted 09 September 2015 - 10:24 AM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 39086 battles
  • 1,033
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012
yes we know the tier 5 and 6 are good. I lol every time i see an anti submarine gun mounted on a tank. lub my tier 5.

 



 


Warlicht #6 Posted 10 September 2015 - 12:50 PM

    Member of the No Gold Shell Party.

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16629 battles
  • 1,421
  • [ID] ID
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostBuLl_NeCk, on 09 September 2015 - 09:24 AM, said:

yes we know the tier 5 and 6 are good. I lol every time i see an anti submarine gun mounted on a tank. lub my tier 5.

 

You know things got serious when you mount an ANTI-SUBMARINE shell. That thing's Navy-grade. It's so awesome it's made not to hunt tanks, but frickin SUBMARINES.


ShaddowKiller9495 #7 Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 4600 battles
  • 24
  • [GGPOC] GGPOC
  • Member since:
    04-27-2015
Just more cannon fodder for me firefly hehe, 6 and up pack a fair decent punch though :sceptic:

rasco4000 #8 Posted 11 September 2015 - 03:13 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 25761 battles
  • 488
  • [AUSE] AUSE
  • Member since:
    04-25-2013

View PostWolvenworks, on 10 September 2015 - 04:50 AM, said:

 

You know things got serious when you mount an ANTI-SUBMARINE shell. That thing's Navy-grade. It's so awesome it's made not to hunt tanks, but frickin SUBMARINES.

 

 

 

and why is this a good thing?? don't know how thick a subs belt is

 



Warlicht #9 Posted 14 September 2015 - 12:32 PM

    Member of the No Gold Shell Party.

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16629 battles
  • 1,421
  • [ID] ID
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View Postrasco4000, on 11 September 2015 - 02:13 PM, said:

 

 

 

and why is this a good thing?? don't know how thick a subs belt is

 

 

Well you can't just go to a Navy gun and say "yeah I want this on my tank". As far as I'm concerned anything from the Navy is definetly more armored than a tank because they have bigger weight limit (Because they're bigger).


Inglorious_Aussie_Tanker #10 Posted 14 September 2015 - 01:31 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 10950 battles
  • 3,929
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

Can I get an 16" for my HMAS TOG II?

I only want 1 but 3 would be nice.

I'm there were blueprints for that Mod somewhere.

Please!  :facepalm:


Vote NOW, to Wall up the Lakeville Valley Pass.

So Many Idiots.

So little Shells.


Warlicht #11 Posted 15 September 2015 - 12:40 PM

    Member of the No Gold Shell Party.

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16629 battles
  • 1,421
  • [ID] ID
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostInglorious_[edited]_Aust, on 14 September 2015 - 12:31 PM, said:

Can I get an 16" for my HMAS TOG II?

I only want 1 but 3 would be nice.

I'm there were blueprints for that Mod somewhere.

Please!  :facepalm:

 

#BeTheBoat

 



Inglorious_Aussie_Tanker #12 Posted 15 September 2015 - 12:59 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 10950 battles
  • 3,929
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

And the OSCAR for best Motion Picture goes to?

 

"Be The Boat" a TOG's dream.

A touching story about a Tank who was picked on and put down for being different.

But rose through the adversity of WAR, and Ridicule to become a Legend of the Waves.

 

"A feel good Family movie.  5 out of 5 stars"  WOT News.

"A cinematic Masterpiece.  9 out of 10"  Tank Buster Video.

"A must see for all generations."  Wolvenworks.

:trollface:


Vote NOW, to Wall up the Lakeville Valley Pass.

So Many Idiots.

So little Shells.


Warlicht #13 Posted 16 September 2015 - 03:30 PM

    Member of the No Gold Shell Party.

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16629 battles
  • 1,421
  • [ID] ID
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostInglorious_[edited]_Aust, on 15 September 2015 - 11:59 AM, said:

And the OSCAR for best Motion Picture goes to?

 

"Be The Boat" a TOG's dream.

A touching story about a Tank who was picked on and put down for being different.

But rose through the adversity of WAR, and Ridicule to become a Legend of the Waves.

 

"A feel good Family movie.  5 out of 5 stars"  WOT News.

"A cinematic Masterpiece.  9 out of 10"  Tank Buster Video.

"A must see for all generations."  Wolvenworks.

:trollface:

 

I would prolly actually say that :trollface:





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users