Jump to content


Improving the British Line


  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

cplripley #61 Posted 29 May 2017 - 08:03 PM

    Sergeant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 27261 battles
  • 115
  • [PERTH] PERTH
  • Member since:
    03-16-2013

View PostJarms, on 11 May 2017 - 11:56 AM, said:

 

I still doubt an Australian line, tiers I, VIII, IX, and X, would all be clones of some kind. The tier VIII and IX would most likely be Centurions, and tier X would be a Leopard 1 variant.

 

Adding the Rhino into the UK/Commonwealth tree could certainly work. There's definitely enough armoured car variants to fill out two low tier trees, with some premiums to spare. I would be very excited to play a Daimler armoured car.

 

Second that, I will pay an obscene amount of money for a tier 1 Rolls Royce armoured car, with Vickers gun and T.E Lawrence as its Commander.

Inglorious_Aussie_Tanker #62 Posted 30 May 2017 - 06:28 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 9954 battles
  • 3,436
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

What about a Premium Centurian Tier 8 AUSTRALIAN Tank?

Say with Glowing Green Camo Paint, and an Unusually stronk Armor, due to say...... RADIATION exposure.

Due to said RADIATION exposure, the Crew enjoy +50% to crew training and maybe a Random super power, due to the RADIATION exposure.

Could also include a RAMMING bonus, where the Irradiated Cent cuts through an Enemy Tank like a Hot knife though butter.

 

At least it'd be based off an IRL Tank and not from a Napkin or Cartoon.  :trollface:


Vote NOW, to Wall up the Lakeville Valley Pass.

So Many Idiots.

So little Shells.


Jarms #63 Posted 30 May 2017 - 11:49 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 13009 battles
  • 525
  • [-KO-] -KO-
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014

View PostInglorious_Aussie_Tanker, on 30 May 2017 - 08:28 AM, said:

What about a Premium Centurion Tier 8 AUSTRALIAN Tank?

Say with Glowing Green Camo Paint, and an Unusually stronk Armor, due to say...... RADIATION exposure.

Due to said RADIATION exposure, the Crew enjoy +50% to crew training and maybe a Random super power, due to the RADIATION exposure.

Could also include a RAMMING bonus, where the Irradiated Cent cuts through an Enemy Tank like a Hot knife though butter.

 

At least it'd be based off an IRL Tank and not from a Napkin or Cartoon.  :trollface:

 

In one of my earlier tech tree proposals I actually suggested the "Nuclear Tank", my idea was to implement it in its Mk. 5/1 configuration, with the up-armoured upper glacis and pre-buff mobility. 

mttspiii #64 Posted 31 May 2017 - 12:23 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24829 battles
  • 15,774
  • [KYLIE] KYLIE
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View PostJarms, on 29 May 2017 - 12:18 PM, said:

 

There's a way we could have our cake and eat it too, if WG want to make a premium out of the split they can use the early model Challenger. See the image I provided for the stock turret. Remove the applique armour, give it the stock 600hp engine, give it the stock 17-Pdr, and make it a tier VI premium.

 

Make APCR the default ammo for the tier 7 TD dangit.

I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 


camdy #65 Posted 04 June 2017 - 12:05 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 17294 battles
  • 462
  • [TOG1R] TOG1R
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

View PostInglorious_Aussie_Tanker, on 30 May 2017 - 08:28 AM, said:

What about a Premium Centurian Tier 8 AUSTRALIAN Tank?

Say with Glowing Green Camo Paint, and an Unusually stronk Armor, due to say...... RADIATION exposure.

Due to said RADIATION exposure, the Crew enjoy +50% to crew training and maybe a Random super power, due to the RADIATION exposure.

Could also include a RAMMING bonus, where the Irradiated Cent cuts through an Enemy Tank like a Hot knife though butter.

 

At least it'd be based off an IRL Tank and not from a Napkin or Cartoon.  :trollface:

 

couldn't see why not as the mk 5/1 would be inbetween tier 8 and 9 as that seems like the direction the new premium tanks are heading:trollface:


 iDd_Sloth RNG ... sometimes it loves you, most of the times it just doesn't care. #WoTbiggermaps  

https://youtu.be/hHkKJfcBXcw


Jarms #66 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:30 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 13009 battles
  • 525
  • [-KO-] -KO-
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014

View Postcamdy, on 04 June 2017 - 02:05 PM, said:

couldn't see why not as the mk 5/1 would be inbetween tier 8 and 9 as that seems like the direction the new premium tanks are heading:trollface:

 

Even if the Mk. 5/1 was a Centurion 1 clone with the (same stats and the) only difference being the upper glacis increased to 120.7mm, it still wouldn't be as pay-to-win as some other tier VIII premiums.

Weslam #67 Posted 07 June 2017 - 06:19 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 11406 battles
  • 418
  • [BLAZE] BLAZE
  • Member since:
    12-08-2013

View PostJarms, on 06 June 2017 - 10:30 PM, said:

Even if the Mk. 5/1 was a Centurion 1 clone with the (same stats and the) only difference being the upper glacis increased to 120.7mm, it still wouldn't be as pay-to-win as some other tier VIII premiums.

 

Indeed, which is why we've got to give it 0.30 accuracy, 1 second aim time, 0.70 hard terrain resistance, six second reload reload, 0.12 gun bloom, and a 410m view range.

 

And paint it black.


Rare photograph of Russian infantryman carrying prototype helmet into battle (Stalingrad, December 1942; colourised)


mttspiii #68 Posted 07 June 2017 - 10:28 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24829 battles
  • 15,774
  • [KYLIE] KYLIE
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View PostWeslam, on 07 June 2017 - 06:19 AM, said:

 

Indeed, which is why we've got to give it 0.30 accuracy, 1 second aim time, 0.70 hard terrain resistance, six second reload reload, 0.12 gun bloom, and a 410m view range.

 

And paint it black.

 

And put a Red Star on it as Lend-Lease.

I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 


Weslam #69 Posted 07 June 2017 - 10:44 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 11406 battles
  • 418
  • [BLAZE] BLAZE
  • Member since:
    12-08-2013

View Postmttspiii, on 07 June 2017 - 10:28 AM, said:

 

And put a Red Star on it as Lend-Lease.

 

Would make sense if it was an early-war British tank, but it's an Australian post-war tank.


Rare photograph of Russian infantryman carrying prototype helmet into battle (Stalingrad, December 1942; colourised)


Jarms #70 Posted 07 June 2017 - 10:57 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 13009 battles
  • 525
  • [-KO-] -KO-
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014
Let's try to get back on topic now fellas. This thread is for suggesting improvements/changes to the UK/Commonwealth line.

Weslam #71 Posted 07 June 2017 - 11:15 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 11406 battles
  • 418
  • [BLAZE] BLAZE
  • Member since:
    12-08-2013

View PostJarms, on 07 June 2017 - 10:57 PM, said:

Let's try to get back on topic now fellas. This thread is for suggesting improvements/changes to the UK/Commonwealth line.

 

I got a suggestion... remove the FV304.

Rare photograph of Russian infantryman carrying prototype helmet into battle (Stalingrad, December 1942; colourised)


Inglorious_Aussie_Tanker #72 Posted 08 June 2017 - 06:11 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 9954 battles
  • 3,436
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015
How about just ADDING ANY FRIGGING BRITISH TANK might be an improvement to the British line.  :sceptic:

Vote NOW, to Wall up the Lakeville Valley Pass.

So Many Idiots.

So little Shells.


mttspiii #73 Posted 10 June 2017 - 10:17 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24829 battles
  • 15,774
  • [KYLIE] KYLIE
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View PostWeslam, on 07 June 2017 - 10:44 PM, said:

 

Would make sense if it was an early-war British tank, but it's an Australian post-war tank.

 

Only way to let a Commonwealth tank be that good in-game is to make it a USSR tank.

I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users