

Sandbox Test Server
#22 Posted 08 June 2016 - 07:48 AM
TE_maaw_, on 08 June 2016 - 09:32 AM, said:
Is there a list of what they intend to be testing?
Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "
>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, Balance TM and the Cartoon Connection
R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"
#23 Posted 08 June 2016 - 07:52 AM
#24 Posted 08 June 2016 - 07:54 AM
Preliminary stats, looks pretty dire at first glance but there testing stuff to see how it changes the game.
https://thearmoredpa...nks-on-sandbox/


#25 Posted 08 June 2016 - 09:23 AM
where will be the physical location of the servers, and how many will there be? 2, like the common test servers?
any testing will be quite painful for players in this region if theres only servers in western russia/eu region or whatnot. is it possible to put one around na west or asia so the people living in the general direction opposite of eu have a chance to get a more accurate representation of actual gameplay?

#26 Posted 08 June 2016 - 11:03 AM
Leopard 1
– Penetration was 268, is now 330
– Damage was 390, is now 350
– DPM was 2804.9, is now 2433.3
– Reload time was 8.342, is now 6.952
– Precision was 0.288, is now 0.144
– Aim time was 1.82, is now 1.44
– Turret traverse was 37.5, is now 27.1
– Hull traverse was 54, is now 40
– HP was 1950, is now 1600
kek
#27 Posted 08 June 2016 - 11:26 AM
#28 Posted 08 June 2016 - 11:42 AM
I have a suggestion, rather than we whine about the premium shell penetration, how about increase the reload time to load premium shell?
You want an additional penetration, you pay additional time to load it

#29 Posted 08 June 2016 - 12:22 PM
madhouse10101, on 08 June 2016 - 01:03 PM, said:
– Damage was 390, is now 350
– DPM was 2804.9, is now 2433.3
– Reload time was 8.342, is now 6.952
This doesn't add up... in fact based on those figures the new DPM would be 3020. Unless they mean rounds per minute rather than reload time.
But anyway, they really seem to be trying new stuff. Personally i'd be happier if they just sorted out the 'horizontal balance' rather than worry about drastic meta level shifts.
Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "
>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, Balance TM and the Cartoon Connection
R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"
#30 Posted 08 June 2016 - 01:07 PM
TE_maaw_, on 08 June 2016 - 11:32 AM, said:
Yeah a turret traverse of 8.5 on my T30 would probably make me quit the game.
--- 3MoE: M4, T37, T21, T20, WZ-131, Type 62, M46 KR, Pershing, T26E4 Scrub. :-(
PBKAC - Proudly sponsored by WG since 2013
#31 Posted 08 June 2016 - 01:09 PM
--- 3MoE: M4, T37, T21, T20, WZ-131, Type 62, M46 KR, Pershing, T26E4 Scrub. :-(
PBKAC - Proudly sponsored by WG since 2013
#32 Posted 08 June 2016 - 01:32 PM
Ezz, on 08 June 2016 - 02:22 PM, said:
This doesn't add up... in fact based on those figures the new DPM would be 3020. Unless they mean rounds per minute rather than reload time.
But anyway, they really seem to be trying new stuff. Personally i'd be happier if they just sorted out the 'horizontal balance' rather than worry about drastic meta level shifts.
https://thearmoredpa...nks-on-sandbox/
Got it from there it also has other tier 10 changes
#34 Posted 08 June 2016 - 01:53 PM
Ezz, on 08 June 2016 - 02:22 PM, said:
This doesn't add up... in fact based on those figures the new DPM would be 3020. Unless they mean rounds per minute rather than reload time.
But anyway, they really seem to be trying new stuff. Personally i'd be happier if they just sorted out the 'horizontal balance' rather than worry about drastic meta level shifts.
current numbers are based on reload time being actual reload time.
Second numbers are based on reload time being rounds/minute
#35 Posted 08 June 2016 - 02:11 PM
JOC469, on 08 June 2016 - 03:53 PM, said:
current numbers are based on reload time being actual reload time.
Second numbers are based on reload time being rounds/minute
Ahh... perfect logicWG thanks revan.
Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "
>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, Balance TM and the Cartoon Connection
R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"
#36 Posted 08 June 2016 - 05:41 PM
#38 Posted 08 June 2016 - 06:15 PM
#40 Posted 08 June 2016 - 09:19 PM
Flying_Elite, on 08 June 2016 - 06:57 AM, said:
Because the active players are people that are still interested in playing the game, the people that leave could still join up but I doubt it would be the changes that they left over.
I would be interested in playing the game if there wasn't a constant fear of getting one shot/two shot by arty/tds with large guns
Though yeah, if the server's in Russia then it would be quite annoying for anyone who doesn't live in Russia to play in the sandbox
Also referring to the armored patrol article, the new IS-6 has more view range than the T110E5? What the [edited]?
Edited by Serene_Potato, 08 June 2016 - 09:22 PM.
I play artillery because I like to promote dynamic gameplay.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users