139 replies to this topic

[Aoyama_Blue_Mountain]

MagicalFlyingFox, on 07 September 2016 - 08:32 AM, said:

 

How so?

 

Would you prefer to fight against the 4th clan in East (WA_V) or the 10th clan in West (DPX)?

 

Or the 7th clan in East (ANZAF) or the 21th in West (GNS)

[Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin]

MagicalFlyingFox, on 07 September 2016 - 12:47 PM, said:

 

He is going to get a tank. 

 

 

Bah, i was wrong. Gap is 401, higher in the east. Table finally updated. That is 1 x5 win. I guess the rush for fame was real in the east. West didn't feel that frantic. 

the fight in the east became frantic because when gns decided to split front, and a few other things happened. the brawls for those x25 defences became a hell of a lot better/harder... the fact that while anzaf was defending at least on two nights, we had three seperate incidents of defence tec victories, which if you do the maths...... is alot of fame in the end. its ashame because all three were unexpected clans to get through (low elo) and either didnt have the numbers thinking it would only b one fight, or they decided to go to other battle which they knew they would win..even though it would net them less fame in the end............

[Drakothl]

To be fair the west front has more timezones to compete in. the east has 4, there will be different volumes of fame earned. 

 

For siting 4th for a majority of the campaign AF can really only blame itself for the 20 odd players we have just outside the top 400.

Well played VAE, CHE and Pyro, 

[SirReitei]

Run_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, on 07 September 2016 - 09:40 AM, said:

the fight in the east became frantic because when gns decided to split front, and a few other things happened. the brawls for those x25 defences became a hell of a lot better/harder... the fact that while anzaf was defending at least on two nights, we had three seperate incidents of defence tec victories, which if you do the maths...... is alot of fame in the end. its ashame because all three were unexpected clans to get through (low elo) and either didnt have the numbers thinking it would only b one fight, or they decided to go to other battle which they knew they would win..even though it would net them less fame in the end............

 

GNS removed division on one of their province and it affected us badly. No fame points for that hour, meaning some of my guys missed out on top 400 by 100 points.

[Sneaked_By_Strv103B]

West side also need to be increased from 100 tanks alteast

[Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin]

mybattletank, on 07 September 2016 - 03:00 PM, said:

West side also need to be increased from 100 tanks alteast

consider yourself lucky that west gets 1k tanks.....fighting on east with 65 other clans for just 400 tanks is not what you would call effective......hell the 100 tanks extra each front would seem more apropriate. but hey lets make glob map season more active so wg has to award more tanks...

[Isuzu_Hana]

Run_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, on 07 September 2016 - 08:40 AM, said:

the fight in the east became frantic because when gns decided to split front, and a few other things happened. the brawls for those x25 defences became a hell of a lot better/harder... the fact that while anzaf was defending at least on two nights, we had three seperate incidents of defence tec victories, which if you do the maths...... is alot of fame in the end. its ashame because all three were unexpected clans to get through (low elo) and either didnt have the numbers thinking it would only b one fight, or they decided to go to other battle which they knew they would win..even though it would net them less fame in the end............

 

After checking out volknn.ru about anzaf, wow, that's a lot of ur member that's on 406-432 range So close yet so far. Sorry to hear that.

[Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin]

Isuzu_Hana, on 07 September 2016 - 03:35 PM, said:

 

After checking out volknn.ru about anzaf, wow, that's a lot of ur member that's on 406-432 range So close yet so far. Sorry to hear that.

we made bad calls... first week was good. but we then pushed too far and was on the back foot..stuff for us to work on next campaign

[MagicalFlyingFox]

Bluefunk, on 07 September 2016 - 11:35 AM, said:

 

Would you prefer to fight against the 4th clan in East (WA_V) or the 10th clan in West (DPX)?

 

Or the 7th clan in East (ANZAF) or the 21th in West (GNS)

Fame rankings per clan is not representative of their skill. It is representative of the clan's priorities. GNS and OMEGA for example did not focus on the objectives, they were more focused on getting their actives into the top 400 and top 1000 respectively. This also meant that they split their players between both fronts to better accommodate their players. 

 

Also, if the east have worse clans, then that means that it is much easier for clans to win so top clans should have a good win/loss, better than the ones on the west. This should balance out the lower elo multipliers. Either way, there is a whole bunch of other influences and since WG is using fame as the overarching front balancer, it makes sense to have them both target an equal cuttoff.

Drakothl, on 07 September 2016 - 12:14 PM, said:

To be fair the west front has more timezones to compete in. the east has 4, there will be different volumes of fame earned. 

 

For siting 4th for a majority of the campaign AF can really only blame itself for the 20 odd players we have just outside the top 400.

Well played VAE, CHE and Pyro, 

 

mybattletank, on 07 September 2016 - 01:00 PM, said:

West side also need to be increased from 100 tanks alteast

 

Taking into account the amount of double-up, there is probably an extra 20 or so tanks to go on the west. CROWN have a fair few. Haven't looked at the rest. 

[SirReitei]

So i guess people on the border line of 400 and 1000  on East and West respectively have to wait and hope for overlaps and the revoking of rewards because of bans/sanctions to see if they are entitled for a reward tank... #feelsbad 

[Drakothl]

Yeah. We started the final night with 15 in. And ended the night with 4. All due to bad play. At least we are close to the 400 so should benefit from the AOW sanctions.  
AF had a solid campaign and was running 3 teams an hour with a 4th on standby most nights. That certainly helped us compete in the clan fame rankings.

[ShadowmonkeyX]

Isuzu_Hana, on 07 September 2016 - 01:35 PM, said:

 

After checking out volknn.ru about anzaf, wow, that's a lot of ur member that's on 406-432 range So close yet so far. Sorry to hear that.

 

Aye... I was 155 fp clear of the 400 rank cutoff at around 11pm Australian Eastern time.... check in the morning and 55 fame and 6 places outside the 400.... RIP
Can't say I didn't expect that after our fairly garbage performance on the last night though
 

[ibianconeri]

Isuzu_Hana, on 07 September 2016 - 03:35 AM, said:

 

After checking out volknn.ru about anzaf, wow, that's a lot of ur member that's on 406-432 range So close yet so far. Sorry to hear that.

 

This kind of thing which make me have no interest in playing in the early timezone. In the west, some mediocre clan still could rip some reward tank but in the east ? Well I guess not.

Edited by ibianconeri, 07 September 2016 - 10:09 PM.

[DreadAngel21]

Drakothl, on 07 September 2016 - 05:26 PM, said:

Yeah. We started the final night with 15 in. And ended the night with 4. All due to bad play. At least we are close to the 400 so should benefit from the AOW sanctions.
AF had a solid campaign and was running 3 teams an hour with a 4th on standby most nights. That certainly helped us compete in the clan fame rankings.

 

You guys gave it a good shot which should be commended, more effort than others we fought against...

Edited by DreadAngel21, 07 September 2016 - 06:28 PM.

[MatchyHK]

Bluefunk, on 07 September 2016 - 09:35 AM, said:

 

Would you prefer to fight against the 4th clan in East (WA_V) or the 10th clan in West (DPX)?

 

Or the 7th clan in East (ANZAF) or the 21th in West (GNS)

 

I say fight against DPX since we are scrubs

Edited by RUN_MatchyHK_, 08 September 2016 - 07:10 PM.

[OutCom]

RUN_MatchyHK_, on 08 September 2016 - 09:10 PM, said:

 

I say fight against DPX since we are scrubs

 

he says with purples stats right under

[LordOfRNG]

When are we able to select our reward tanks?

 

[SiKiN]

LordOfRNG, on 11 September 2016 - 06:06 AM, said:

When are we able to select our reward tanks?

 

 

http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1

[REDL1NE]

LordOfRNG, on 11 September 2016 - 05:36 AM, said:

When are we able to select our reward tanks?

 

 

Wg are ignoring all mention of reward tanks and deliverance until all investigations into reports for the CW campaign are completed as there are so many. Due to this fact, WG are also considering that due to the amount of players already sanctioned and will not receive and rewards, they may have to do a manual addition to our garages, which will take even longer to the schedule, as they have to adjust the players on the rankings board. If everyone was legit, we'd have them by now but these people won't quit. We may still need to wait another week which will be painful to say, but I'm grinding my crew for my selection anyway,hopefully we still have a choice for this one.

[Kaami__Sama]

Invalid_Username, on 11 September 2016 - 04:40 AM, said:

 

Wg are ignoring all mention of reward tanks and deliverance until all investigations into reports for the CW campaign are completed as there are so many. Due to this fact, WG are also considering that due to the amount of players already sanctioned and will not receive and rewards, they may have to do a manual addition to our garages, which will take even longer to the schedule, as they have to adjust the players on the rankings board. If everyone was legit, we'd have them by now but these people won't quit. We may still need to wait another week which will be painful to say, but I'm grinding my crew for my selection anyway,hopefully we still have a choice for this one.

 

From TIM 3 ppl getting it congratulations man HOPE TIM keeps up the good work