Jump to content


Birth of Titans rule violation reporting


  • Please log in to reply
77 replies to this topic

Pakmanious #21 Posted 02 September 2016 - 06:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 33249 battles
  • 104
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

Looks like 5AE tried a comeback to CW after more than 28 days of inactivity.

 

 

 

Not very successful :P

 

 

It might be interesting to see a replay of that battle.



Centurion_MK64 #22 Posted 03 September 2016 - 11:57 AM

    Wait I have'nt seen this mod before?

  • Senior Moderator
  • 33831 battles
  • 3,780
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

OK can we keep this thread to reporting violations of the Titans Campaign.

 

The replay which appears to show an illegal mod being used has been sent to GM for investigation

 

>Centurion_NZ


Edited by Centurion_NZ, 03 September 2016 - 12:04 PM.

 
I am here to help, please don't hesitate to PM me
For help and gameplay advice please try the WG Wiki or contact Support

ekzx #23 Posted 03 September 2016 - 09:29 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta-Tester
  • 43961 battles
  • 81
  • Member since:
    09-26-2012

If you have a mod friend, you could easily get someone chat banned? :sceptic:

 

Insults towards Mod/GM/Admin. User sanctioned.

 

I am more than happy to post the replay that was sent which earned your in-game chat ban. At least your platoon mate has accepted what he did was wrong.

 

>Centurion_NZ


Edited by Centurion_NZ, 04 September 2016 - 06:31 AM.


N4VI #24 Posted 04 September 2016 - 08:22 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 9909 battles
  • 442
  • [-NRD-] -NRD-
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012

I'm not against the creation of sub clans but creating one for the sake of off-setting battles for the parent clan should be looked into. Yes WG have implemented the penalty system whereby chip spamming and consistent forfeiting results in the inability to place bids for landings. However, with a sub clan offsetting on purpose, it bends the rules and penalty system. This is because, to avoid a penalty, the parent clan can just hope that the sub clan field a minimum of 8 players and just end the battle in a loss for the parent clan. Isn't this against the rules of the campaign? "Fake battles?" It is really unfair. Basically farming fame points from "one another," manipulating their ELO and last but not least, earn the rewards in an illegitimate way.  Good work for penalizing VPA. How about the AFP-Rebel issue? Should Rebel go unpunished as well? Just because they are not in the same "spotlight" as VPA even though they did something against the rules and regulations. If this wants to addressed, it has to be done across the board to be fair to players and clans on both fronts.

 

Put this in another thread please. This particular one is only for reporting violations, don't clutter it with discussion. Note: The next off-topic post will be dealt with as per SOP.

 

~neokai


Edited by neokai, 04 September 2016 - 11:12 AM.

 

 


MadHouse10101 #25 Posted 05 September 2016 - 05:54 PM

    Legit T-22 btw

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 24143 battles
  • 887
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    01-08-2014

Ok so after some more investigation on 5ae and AOW because like, why not go for wreaking the clan that 5ae members go to for 4 times in a row because they seem to not learn from there mistakes. 

 

To start off with i will show you 5ae log for the current campaign and what i first sore when i looked into this.

Spoiler

 

Already its dodgy as hell as they are only landing on AOW, they are also doing this and loosing every time as 5ae is dead clam and AOW issnt so they would want to help AOW get fame, but they are apply for these battles knowing they cant field them as they have 0 online always as you can see in paks post above. So to prove that is this blantant rigging of battles i will now post a lot of pictures and explain whats going on.

 

 

So to start off with these clans both share a raid call, like what dodgy alliance doesn't.

Spoiler

 

Also with in the 2-3 days the current member changes between the clans have been very obvious 

 

These are the members that have left AOW

Spoiler

 

And these are players that have left 5-AE is past 1-2 days 

Spoiler

 

 

I hit cap on images look down for MMMOOOOOOOOAAAAAARRRRRR


Edited by madhouse10101, 05 September 2016 - 05:55 PM.

          

                       

                                                                                                                                                                                    


MadHouse10101 #26 Posted 05 September 2016 - 05:58 PM

    Legit T-22 btw

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 24143 battles
  • 887
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    01-08-2014

and here is your MMMMMMOOOOOOOOOAAAAARRRRRRRRR

 

This the current member changes with 5-ae for the past two months, most of them being AOW or from GA. 

Spoiler

 

And the final and very likely reason why they are doing this, there clan commanders previous clan was 5ae...........................................................

 

now i could find more evidence but i think is enough and im sick of copy pasting imgur links :P If you would like more evidence say so. 


          

                       

                                                                                                                                                                                    


Elphaba #27 Posted 05 September 2016 - 06:02 PM

    Private

  • Beta-Tester
  • 995 battles
  • 2,573
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013

View Postmadhouse10101, on 05 September 2016 - 09:58 AM, said:

and here is your MMMMMMOOOOOOOOOAAAAARRRRRRRRR

 

This the current member changes with 5-ae for the past two months, most of them being AOW or from GA. 

Spoiler

 

And the final and very likely reason why they are doing this, there clan commanders previous clan was 5ae...........................................................

 

now i could find more evidence but i think is enough and im sick of copy pasting imgur links :P If you would like more evidence say so. 

 

Way ahead on you on this one. Already sent it in for investigation this morning.

Fluffysauruss #28 Posted 05 September 2016 - 08:30 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 14931 battles
  • 35
  • [OWL] OWL
  • Member since:
    05-20-2013

This is not exactly a "violation" but if anyone can clarify this , would be wonderful.

We lost against UMRC which 
has higher rating than us and we got 13 points.


We lost against GOLD which has a similar rating than us and we got 13 points.



We WON against RTA that has a higher rating than us and we got 13? points? Why.


Shouldn't it be something along the lines of 50+? Or are we looking at this wrong ?

A Clarification would be wonderful.

 


Fire AP. Learn to aim. 
Abbey_Cat is love Abbey_Cat is life.  

-: CALM - SAFE - HOPE - CROWN :-
Join us


DOICODOC_1102 #29 Posted 06 September 2016 - 12:15 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 22776 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    11-28-2013
I want to report clan [UMRC] UMR.D Protection Squadron with reason: deliberate to technical defeat with clan [SWA] in the final battle with owner.

N4VI #30 Posted 06 September 2016 - 01:07 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 9909 battles
  • 442
  • [-NRD-] -NRD-
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012

View PostxRainbowAssassinx, on 31 August 2016 - 10:34 AM, said:

Can we stop this blatant off setting before it happens.

 

Repost the screenshots if you can. Make it more visible.

 

 


Elphaba #31 Posted 06 September 2016 - 02:19 PM

    Private

  • Beta-Tester
  • 995 battles
  • 2,573
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013

View PostDOICODOC_1102, on 05 September 2016 - 04:15 PM, said:

I want to report clan [UMRC] UMR.D Protection Squadron with reason: deliberate to technical defeat with clan [SWA] in the final battle with owner.

 

I've had this checked. Looks like they just ran out of available players since they had another battle scheduled at the same time. This will be handled by automated penalty system.

 

View PostSub_Jugation, on 06 September 2016 - 05:07 AM, said:

Repost the screenshots if you can. Make it more visible.

 

This has also been checked. AFP only had 1 battle throughout the entire event and this was lost via default.

Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin #32 Posted 06 September 2016 - 02:22 PM

    Professional Runner Away-er

  • Member
  • 31331 battles
  • 1,382
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-15-2014

View PostElphaba, on 06 September 2016 - 06:19 PM, said:

.

 

 

This has also been checked. AFP only had 1 battle throughout the entire event and this was lost via default.

so even though the parent clan has blatantly done this in the past....with the same effect...nothing will happen now? even though the offending subclan only played one battle and then they never "got used again" because they realised they got busted red handed....


Edited by Run_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, 06 September 2016 - 02:22 PM.

2nd Gen Pyromaniac, born of the ANZAS winds.......crazy commando of anzaf of old, and namer of BadIntent..

"He Bravely Ran, where no man would run..."

LOOK! a wild Robin appeared! "YIKES!!~~~RUN AWAY~~~~"

 

PBKAC, proudly Sponsored by the WGM


N4VI #33 Posted 06 September 2016 - 02:32 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 9909 battles
  • 442
  • [-NRD-] -NRD-
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012

View PostRun_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, on 06 September 2016 - 02:22 PM, said:

so even though the parent clan has blatantly done this in the past....with the same effect...nothing will happen now? even though the offending subclan only played one battle and then they never "got used again" because they realised they got busted red handed....

 

I am with you on this. Parent clan did "once" hoping to get unnoticed. They failed and stopped using it for fear of getting caught again. So they go unpunished? No sanctions at all? Wouldn't be surprised this happens again next campaign. Like a "one-off" for every campaign it seems...

 

 


Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin #34 Posted 06 September 2016 - 02:37 PM

    Professional Runner Away-er

  • Member
  • 31331 battles
  • 1,382
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-15-2014

View PostSub_Jugation, on 06 September 2016 - 06:32 PM, said:

 

I am with you on this. Parent clan did "once" hoping to get unnoticed. They failed and stopped using it for fear of getting caught again. So they go unpunished? No sanctions at all? Wouldn't be surprised this happens again next campaign. Like a "one-off" for every campaign it seems...

thats because unlike other clans *cough 

being monitored for the same thing.... they only do. it if its not noticed, but I saw this happen a few times in past campaigns...with said clan in question


2nd Gen Pyromaniac, born of the ANZAS winds.......crazy commando of anzaf of old, and namer of BadIntent..

"He Bravely Ran, where no man would run..."

LOOK! a wild Robin appeared! "YIKES!!~~~RUN AWAY~~~~"

 

PBKAC, proudly Sponsored by the WGM


FND_MY #35 Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:15 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 31816 battles
  • 14
  • [BUST] BUST
  • Member since:
    07-08-2013

Title: Fury sub clan spam landing but did not enter battle.


 

Hi War Gaming, please investigate.


 

https://s11.postimg.org/v4qpaxw4z/Fury_Sub_Clan_Spam_Landing.jpg


 


 


 


 

 

 



HERO_POWERLOK_DADDY #36 Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:43 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 14045 battles
  • 12
  • [HEROS] HEROS
  • Member since:
    08-14-2013
Endless Fury spam chip in own province
[WRATH] ENDLESS WRATH
[RAGE] ENDLESS RAGE
[OZZIE] Boys from OZ South East Asian
this 3 clan are Fury sub clan

Attached Files

  • Attached File   GGGGG.jpg   46.2K


N4VI #37 Posted 07 September 2016 - 12:03 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 9909 battles
  • 442
  • [-NRD-] -NRD-
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012

View PostElphaba, on 06 September 2016 - 02:19 PM, said:

 

I've had this checked. Looks like they just ran out of available players since they had another battle scheduled at the same time. This will be handled by automated penalty system.

 

 

This has also been checked. AFP only had 1 battle throughout the entire event and this was lost via default.

Still, it is manipulating the battle outcome. And with a Parent and Sub Clan. And that "default" or "fake" win is worth 60+ fame points and even more as Parent clan moves onto next round in the landing tournament (possibly gaining more points as well). In that case, all the points that they earned in that particular landing tournament should be revoked in my opinion. It is unfair for players that miss out on the top 400 by say 50-100 points if players in this particular "default" or "fake" win got more than 50-100 points in total with the progression of rounds. I'm just stating my case that even if this is a "one-off," it should be treated with impartiality with "larger" rule violation. End of the day, a rule violation is a rule violation. And every fame point does matter where you rank at the end of the campaign.


 

 


N4VI #38 Posted 07 September 2016 - 11:37 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 9909 battles
  • 442
  • [-NRD-] -NRD-
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012
2 consecutive tech vics (1 lead up and the battle with owner)  basically meant that 2 of my players missed out on top 400 as we earned 0 fame points in the final 7pm (gmt+8) prime time. Missed out on at at least 100-200 fame points in total. Can someone look at why DETOX had to forfeit and why GNS decided to remove division when they still had a division on another province at mountain pass at 6.30pm. (gmt+8)

 

 


Weebl #39 Posted 07 September 2016 - 01:06 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 15027 battles
  • 1,442
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    12-21-2012
Clans can pull divisions any time they want for any reason they want. If they have a division there, they have to play or take a penalty, if they yank the division there is nothing you can do about it and they haven't done anything wrong.

I pulled a division from the map yesterday because I didn't want to run the risk of 4 simultaneous battles on the last day of campaign with no guarantee we could feild 4 teams.

Sucks if you are the clan attacking the empty province but completely legal and above board.

Edited by Weebl, 07 September 2016 - 01:06 PM.


spacewolf #40 Posted 07 September 2016 - 01:12 PM

    I still think it's morally wrong so in fact I'm right.

  • Beta-Tester
  • 80545 battles
  • 3,027
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

I'm more interested in the fact you played 18 games yesterday. How did you manage such a feat without throwing something out the window/smashing the PC?

 

Mellowing out in your old age old mate?

 

you've changed man, you've changed....


Proudly sponsored by WG

 

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users