279 replies to this topic

[Endrex]

Weebl, on 13 September 2016 - 07:08 AM, said:

I *think* I know what you are saying (and your English is about 50000 times better than my Vietnamese so not having a go) 

 

Honestly, if I were in your position, I certainly would not be defending my clan on the forums and I would probably (as in 100% probability) have left the clan by now and tried to find a clan that better reflected my values and didn't drag my name down with it. 

 

imo the best solution should be taken by WG as removing the mod folder as well as preventing using illegal injections, individual's value could be preserved but it does not matter much, who care abt it anw. People will juz say whatever they think to make them happy. Even I was called by a member of my clan that I am a chai snipping unicum when I posted the battle result with Patrol Duty + 4800 DMG spot, and he mean it actually. 

P/s: I have no idea what Lee saying 

Edited by Atom_Miracle, 14 September 2016 - 01:11 AM.

[party]

Tanitha, on 14 September 2016 - 02:25 AM, said:

 

This handles real clans that are playing clanwars.. For sure.

However, clans with inactive alt clan leaders, who aren't playing clanwars, attacking in a clanwars event and not turning up.... Results in sanctions manually being placed..
Something like .. the clan being nuked. Depending on all the circumstances.

 

 

Or to be more simple.. Its safe to stick to ...
Real players, Real clans, Real battles..

 

Regards
Tan

On ru server many top clans have inactive clan leaders, who aren't playing clanwars. its just the best way to keep your clan save in case someone will hack commander's account and disband clan.

[Kaami__Sama]

When rewards  

[_Arix_]

Well thats a great idea WG, Now gamers can use CHEAT/ILLEGAL MODS and easily win clan wars and tournament. Without losing their reward, and just getting ban for few period.
Well played WG.
Other gamers seriously dont deserve rewards rather than these cheaters.
It will be fun playing againts cheaters in future clan war that too with thier CLAN WAR REWARD TANKS
 

[afoxq]

Fury_17_jais, on 14 September 2016 - 12:45 AM, said:

seriously u guys did a good job wargaming for giving dem awards regardless they are cheating in clan war now I will tell each member of my clan not to purchase nythng frm wargaming because they are fraud

 

Anshu_kumar_, on 14 September 2016 - 01:22 AM, said:

Well thats a great idea WG, Now gamers can use CHEAT/ILLEGAL MODS and easily win clan wars and tournament. Without losing their reward, and just getting ban for few period.
Well played WG.
Other gamers seriously dont deserve rewards rather than these cheaters.
It will be fun playing againts cheaters in future clan war that too with thier CLAN WAR REWARD TANKS
 

 

Hmmm about that, perhaps you could ask your clan leadership about this episode ...  
 

[I1KING1I]

wow "No players in the three clans, were disqualified from CW event rewards." means i need to search for good mods.. i was playing like sheep in the battles and my team meets telling me all the time see in left there is enemy(which was hiding)..and got all the time criticle hit in series(which is no coincidence ..use of mods)...kindly anybody suggest me good mod for auto aim find and direction of enemy designation...please help.. next time if we come up at the top("if" we play becoz there are more pro mod players are there..i will not play for reward)..then u can understand power of mods...

 

Prohibited mods, and promotion of prohibited mods is prohibited.
7 day forum Ro issued.

 

/Tan

Edited by Tanitha, 14 September 2016 - 01:46 PM.

[JOC469]

Anshu_kumar_, on 14 September 2016 - 03:22 AM, said:

Well thats a great idea WG, Now gamers can use CHEAT/ILLEGAL MODS and easily win clan wars and tournament. Without losing their reward, and just getting ban for few period.
Well played WG.
Other gamers seriously dont deserve rewards rather than these cheaters.
It will be fun playing againts cheaters in future clan war that too with thier CLAN WAR REWARD TANKS
 

 

What are you referring to here? I think that you might be mixing up the sanctions for different clans.

 

The player from __S__ that posted a replay showing him using am aimbottish has been suspended and will not receive a reward tank.

The VPA players that took part in staged games were suspended and will not receive reward tanks and their officers were also suspended.

There were 2 inactive clans from RAGE/FURRY/etc that were used to offset battles and did not show up. Their command structure was effectively removed however since no rewards were attained then they can't have anything else done to them.

[I1KING1I]

actually we are on the margin 50+ from 1000 ... so if nobody is gona removed then .. i m failed to understand .. that why is investigation going on... and why we r reading and writing here.. wg should simple give reward to the ppl who acquired it already and remove the repeater so we can see either we get tank or not.. simple... put us out of misery of hope that we have any chAnce

Edited by I1KING1I, 14 September 2016 - 04:13 AM.

[Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin]

Rayuduvadlamani, on 14 September 2016 - 05:20 AM, said:

When rewards  

stop asking. the more you ask, the longer its going to take

[MagicalFlyingFox]

I1KING1I, on 14 September 2016 - 06:09 AM, said:

actually we are on the margin 50+ from 1000 ... so if nobody is gona removed then .. i m failed to understand .. that why is investigation going on... and why we r reading and writing here.. wg should simple give reward to the ppl who acquired it already and remove the repeater so we can see either we get tank or not.. simple... put us out of misery of hope that we have any chAnce

 

what?

Let WG handle their shit, if you can't wait the required time it takes WG to allocate the appropriate sanctions and alterations to allow the prize distribution to run smoothly, that's your problem. Quit [edited] whining and understand that the world doesn't revolve around you and your clan. We have all accepted what has been going on here, understand that these things can't be done in a day or a week.

[Beaufighter]

Removed.

Edited by Beaufighter, 14 September 2016 - 11:16 AM.

[Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin]

Beaufighter, on 14 September 2016 - 02:50 PM, said:

2 Questions

 

1/ I heard that if you had less than 8 players readied up for a CW battle then it would automatically forfeit and give a technical victory.  Is this the case?

 

2/ Do you have any way of seeing if Wrath/Rage had 7 or less players readied up?  They might've had some tanks readied up and could not get in due to the above restriction.

1/ yes. minimum you need readied up and in the team is 8 for tier 8 cws.

3/ only way is for wrath/rage to provide screenshots on the night/if someone livestreamed and had footage of them readying up tanks etc. otherwise no.

2/ when the special battle pops for any cws, it shows the minimum number of tanks required to fill a team. and (im on phone so cbf checking) if you look at wrath/rages total past cw history you could probably check how many cw they have done.....(that includes checking their officers) so common knowledge well and truely would be there about min tanks required especially if multiple members have taken part in cws before

 

edit: updated answers to updated post..

Edited by Run_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, 14 September 2016 - 11:02 AM.

[MagicalFlyingFox]

Beaufighter, on 14 September 2016 - 12:50 PM, said:

3 Questions

 

1/ I heard that if you had less than 8 players readied up for a CW battle then it would automatically forfeit and give a technical victory, is this the case?

 

2/ If so, was this clearly stated somewhere, in rules that could be easily found?  (I found it difficult to find the rules as they were posted as news items and as such were pushed back  5 or so pages every time I went to view them).

 

3/ Do you have any way of seeing if Wrath/Rage had 7 or less players readied up?  They might've had some tanks readied up and could not get in due to the above restriction.

This has been enacted for about a year or so, i thought we all understood this?

Probably longer, it might have been one of the things addressed in CW2.0

[MagicalFlyingFox]

Issue was addressed last year during last campaign. 

http://forum.worldof...43#entry1426343

 

It has remained since. 

[Beaufighter]

Removed.

Edited by Beaufighter, 14 September 2016 - 11:44 AM.

[afoxq]

Beaufighter, on 14 September 2016 - 11:05 AM, said:

After CW 1 the rules became so overwhelmingly complicated and convoluted that many people have probably given up on reading or even trying to understand them.  Most people are here to play a first person/third person tank shooter game, not a role playing game or a strategy game.  Every iteration (re effluence / forced strongholds battles) of the CW rules makes CW harder to understand and more difficult for people to get involved in.

 

If you're not gonna read and understand the R&Rs, dont complain when sanctions get handed out onto you.  

[MagicalFlyingFox]

Beaufighter, on 14 September 2016 - 01:05 PM, said:

After CW 1 the rules became so overwhelmingly complicated and convoluted that many people have probably given up on reading or even trying to understand them.  Most people are here to play a first person/third person tank shooter game, not a role playing game or a strategy game.  Every iteration (re effluence / forced strongholds battles) of the CW rules makes CW harder to understand and more difficult for people to get involved in.

 

These 'rules' were really mechanic changes to enforce the rules. Its hard enough to win with 1 tank down let alone 2 which is the minimum. 3 tanks down is almost a confirmed loss. There is no point to bringing in less than 8 tanks since its just disadvantaging the other team. i.e. you're not taking it seriously, it wont count as a 'real battle'. 

With regards to the common soldier, their role is to simply turn up. Its the clan officers roles to negotiate, move divisions and plan on the map, as well as inform the clan as to what is going on. The sanctions do address this by banning those responsible. It's not WG's fault that the officers (if they were in fact trying to get the clan battles) did not know how the game works. 

 

edit: Its not as if clan wars is difficult, all the rules are simple common sense. Real battles (bring enough tanks, play to win/draw if defending), real players, don't use illegal mods. 

Edited by MagicalFlyingFox, 14 September 2016 - 11:11 AM.

[Beaufighter]

No point posting on this forum, you guys just twist what I am saying in whatever direction you like.

 

I was simply throwing up reasons why a small clan may have chipped and not been able to turn up.

 

And commenting that the current CW rules are complicated and convoluted.

Edited by Beaufighter, 14 September 2016 - 11:23 AM.

[Run_Away_Brave_Sir_Robin]

Beaufighter, on 14 September 2016 - 03:18 PM, said:

No point me posting on this forum, you guys just twist what is saying in whatever direction you like.

 

I was simply throwing up reasons why a small clan may have chipped and not been able to turn up.

no we are simply explaining to you, how when and why the rules were made to be as they are. some people here do bring it off as a little more insulting if thats, what you mean.. but its still giving you the correct answers to your questions......

[MagicalFlyingFox]

Beaufighter, on 14 September 2016 - 01:18 PM, said:

No point me posting on this forum, you guys just twist what is saying in whatever direction you like.

 

I was simply throwing up reasons why a small clan may have chipped and not been able to turn up.

 

Under normal circumstances, this falls under the general automatic system that gives a warning for the first technical defeat. 

 

edit: Which is the responsibility of the clan officers.

Edited by MagicalFlyingFox, 14 September 2016 - 11:22 AM.