Jump to content


Clanwars Season 5 rule violation reporting


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
72 replies to this topic

Mobius99 #1 Posted 16 January 2017 - 06:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

This thread is ONLY for Clanwars rule violation reporting

 

The following behavior/action will be investigated by Clanwars management staff:

  • Clan violation: battle rigging, clan action to gain unfair advantage on CW global map/in battles, clan chip spamming(mass bidding without participation in battles).
  • Unsportsmanlike conduct in CW battle: playing with food, self-kill or other action considered inappropriate in a fair competition.
  • Other actions which may affect the fairness of Clanwars results.

 

The following behavior/action will NOT be investigated by Clanwars management staff, please send a ticket to Support center - Rule Violation section to report:

  • Use of prohibited mods.
  • Abusive in-game chat/PM 
  • Other actions which not directly related with Clanwars.

 

Please make sure to provide complete information so that the reported case can be thoroughly investigated.

Information include (but not limit to) the following:

  • Screenshots
  • Replays
  • Province details
  • Date + Time

 

Regards,

Mobius99



Mobius99 #2 Posted 06 February 2017 - 02:09 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Following clan/players were sanctioned for CW battle rigging/massive AFK in battle:

 

Clan EMP

 

Commander - 7 days game ban

All other officers - 3 days game ban

Players participated in rigged battle - 3 days game ban (7 days game ban on TKer)

-10% Clan overall VP

 

Further violation will result in more severe sanction and may see the clan disqualified from Season 5.

 

Regards,
Mobius99

 



Mobius99 #3 Posted 06 February 2017 - 03:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostXBONX, on 06 February 2017 - 02:38 PM, said:

EMP 클랜에 사령관을 맡고 있는 본이라는 유저요

 

자랑스런 한글로 쓸터이니 니가 알아서 번역기 돌려서 번역을하던가 워게이 코리아에 맡겨서 번역을 하던가 그건 알아서 하시고 

 

오늘 우리 클랜에 운영진 및 클랜원들에게 3일간 정지를 선물로 주셨더라고  무었때문에 정지 사유가 되는지에 대해서 짐작은 하나 니네 이번 클전 시스템을 보면 인원 없는 클랜은 

클전 하지말라는 의미의 정지겠지? 클전판 뭣같이 만들어놓고 클전 했더니 정지를 쳐먹여? 니네가 생각하는 새끼들이라면 이런 짓 안해놧겠지

불법모드 쓰는  새끼들은 버젓이 겜하고 다니는데 ㅇ잠수탱크들 세워둿다고 정지를 쳐먹이면 이 겜이 하고 싶겠냐!

 

이겜 아니면 할게 읍냐 더러워서 겜하기 싫어진다! 불법 모드 쓰는 새끼들이나 잡어 엄한 사람들 잡지말고 일은 그렇게 하는거야

 

 

First of all, please post in English as this is an English forum.

 

Second, your clan is not in violation because of "illegal modification", but misbehavior / TK / AFK in a CW battle.

 

Please be careful in the future, and do not repeat the same violation again.

 

In short:

1. DO NOT bring AFK players into CW battle (or any other battle mode).
2. DO NOT intentional team kill teammates in CW battle (or any other battle mode).
3. If you cannot organize enough players to join CW battle, just leave it and plan better next time.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



XBONX #4 Posted 06 February 2017 - 03:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 18611 battles
  • 12
  • [EMP] EMP
  • Member since:
    06-07-2015
Non-constructive posting. User sanctioned

 

>Bas_Dearg


Edited by Bas_Dearg, 06 February 2017 - 03:58 PM.


naic7 #5 Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:06 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 18683 battles
  • 8
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    11-30-2013

Hi, 

 

I was just wondering if it is possible for [-NP-] and [-NPA-]'s CW activity to be confirmed as not being battle rigging etc. 

-NPA- appears to be a feeder/ second clan under -NP- and they have joined the same provinces on a number of occasions and 'fought' each other at T6.

 

instances were:

  • Veszprem Province 26_01_2017  (2000 UTC +8)
  • Graz Province 5_02_2017 (2115 UTC +8)
  • Graz Province 6_02_2017 (2115 UTC +8)


please find the evidence images attached in this dropbox link 

https://www.dropbox....258BJ1pxwa?dl=0

 

Thanks 



Mobius99 #6 Posted 07 February 2017 - 11:47 AM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View Postnaic7, on 06 February 2017 - 10:06 PM, said:

Hi, 

 

I was just wondering if it is possible for [-NP-] and [-NPA-]'s CW activity to be confirmed as not being battle rigging etc. 

-NPA- appears to be a feeder/ second clan under -NP- and they have joined the same provinces on a number of occasions and 'fought' each other at T6.

 

instances were:

  • Veszprem Province 26_01_2017  (2000 UTC +8)
  • Graz Province 5_02_2017 (2115 UTC +8)
  • Graz Province 6_02_2017 (2115 UTC +8)


please find the evidence images attached in this dropbox link 

https://www.dropbox....258BJ1pxwa?dl=0

 

Thanks 

 

Hi,

 

Allied/sub clans working together is allowed, as long as they take part in battles within rules.


After investigation, both clans participated in battles normally without major signs of battle rigging, therefore no further action will be taken in this case.

 

Thank you for your concern, and if you find anything unusual again, please do share with us.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



moyzie #7 Posted 12 February 2017 - 09:14 PM

    Tinfoil Theorist

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 9451 battles
  • 201
  • [AAS] AAS
  • Member since:
    11-19-2014

we struck this battle tonight 

a possible AFK 

http://wotreplays.co...-moyzie-t-34-85



Mobius99 #8 Posted 13 February 2017 - 08:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View Postmoyzie, on 12 February 2017 - 09:14 PM, said:

we struck this battle tonight 

a possible AFK 

http://wotreplays.co...-moyzie-t-34-85

 

The player is maybe just camping for last stand, no further action will be taken in this case.

 

Regards,
Mobius99



Austins543 #9 Posted 16 February 2017 - 04:59 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 14120 battles
  • 5
  • [-MSQ-] -MSQ-
  • Member since:
    05-31-2015

Hi There, 
Just had a clan war on Provence Kamianets-Podilskyi (Abbey 2100 +15 UTC +13) 
Had 1 member left on there team. M44. Who was last one left and proceeded to go and drown himself. 

 

Attached is the evidence:  http://wotreplays.co...9a346daa58b3fd3

 

Thanks, 
Austins543

 


 



Mobius99 #10 Posted 16 February 2017 - 05:24 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostAustins543, on 16 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Hi There, 
Just had a clan war on Provence Kamianets-Podilskyi (Abbey 2100 +15 UTC +13) 
Had 1 member left on there team. M44. Who was last one left and proceeded to go and drown himself. 

 

Attached is the evidence:  http://wotreplays.co...9a346daa58b3fd3

 

Thanks, 
Austins543

 

Hi,

 

For this case, unfortunately, from the replay we cannot confirm if the player drowned intentionally or by accident.

If you have more info for this case, feel free to send it to me anytime.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



Austins543 #11 Posted 17 February 2017 - 06:07 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 14120 battles
  • 5
  • [-MSQ-] -MSQ-
  • Member since:
    05-31-2015

View PostMobius99, on 16 February 2017 - 09:24 PM, said:

 

Hi,

 

For this case, unfortunately, from the replay we cannot confirm if the player drowned intentionally or by accident.

If you have more info for this case, feel free to send it to me anytime.

 

Regards,

Mobius99

 

Cool, I have sent you a message on Skype regarding what i have found since posting this, and willing to help to find a way around this problem. Thanks for your fast response as well mobius 

 

Thanks



stewiejp #12 Posted 17 February 2017 - 12:10 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 35454 battles
  • 1,302
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    06-30-2013

Free cam on replays is a wonderful thing... I would find it very unlikely drowning in this position would be an accident.... just saying, as an impartial viewer

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image


                                                                                                                                                  stewiejp on youtube #getonboard

xRainbowAssassinx #13 Posted 17 February 2017 - 12:29 PM

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 26713 battles
  • 1,395
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View Poststewiejp, on 17 February 2017 - 12:10 PM, said:

Free cam on replays is a wonderful thing... I would find it very unlikely drowning in this position would be an accident.... just saying, as an impartial viewer

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image

 

100% he could have gotten out. if you see the way he is facing, he wasn't trying to get out. He was going deeper in.

Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn                           

 


Mobius99 #14 Posted 17 February 2017 - 07:24 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View Poststewiejp, on 17 February 2017 - 12:10 PM, said:

Free cam on replays is a wonderful thing... I would find it very unlikely drowning in this position would be an accident.... just saying, as an impartial viewer

 

View PostxRainbowAssassinx, on 17 February 2017 - 12:29 PM, said:

 

100% he could have gotten out. if you see the way he is facing, he wasn't trying to get out. He was going deeper in.

 

Thanks guys, the screen shots are good enough to make a case.

 



Mobius99 #15 Posted 17 February 2017 - 07:27 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Following clan/player were sanctioned for unsportsmanlike conduct - Self-kill in clanwars battle:

 

Clan BAMF

 

Player in violation - 3 days game ban

 

Regards,
Mobius99



Ballisticx #16 Posted 17 February 2017 - 07:38 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 40830 battles
  • 48
  • [BAMF] BAMF
  • Member since:
    12-29-2013

Not sure how this became an issue when I talked to the THINK lads after battle. Multiple battles at same time needed to be elsewhere.

 

Well done! No common sense here.


Edited by Ballisticx, 17 February 2017 - 07:40 PM.


neokai #17 Posted 17 February 2017 - 08:00 PM

    SealClub Number 9

  • Forum Moderator
  • 33686 battles
  • 7,105
  • [CROWN] CROWN
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View PostBallisticx, on 17 February 2017 - 07:38 PM, said:

Not sure how this became an issue when I talked to the THINK lads after battle. Multiple battles at same time needed to be elsewhere.

 

Well done! No common sense here.

 

In that situation, charge the enemy. Drowning denies the opponent exp/fame and goes against the spirit of the game.

 

On a separate note, I'm leaving your text here because it was a material response to the accusation, but this thread is ONLY for the reporting of violations and the proofs both for/against it. Going further off-topic is strongly discouraged.

 

~neokai


Spoiler

Hilly #18 Posted 19 February 2017 - 12:29 PM

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 11025 battles
  • 1,912
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

I would like to report QT for deliberately offsetting a LZ with a sub clan.  The sub clan in question is [F1_VP] F1_Vietnam_ Pirates

 

https://asia.wargaming.net/clans/wot/2000008747/players/#players&offset=0&limit=25&order=-role&timeframe=all&battle_type=default

 

This was done so QT didn't have 2 battles at the same time.  The result for QT: The clan defeated the [F1_VP]  F1_Vietnam_ Pirates clan in a landing tournament for the Agen province.

 

Surprise surprise F1_VP didn't turn up and it was a tech win for QT. Look forward to some IP checking, nuking and banning, as not sure how many times QT have had bans for offsetting, cheating now.

 


Edited by Hilly, 19 February 2017 - 03:15 PM.

 

 

 

 



Pyromaniacs [PYRO] is recruiting now. Please email/pm me if you are interested.


Run_Away_Brave_sir_Robin #19 Posted 19 February 2017 - 01:56 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 21115 battles
  • 744
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    10-15-2014

View PostHilly, on 19 February 2017 - 04:29 PM, said:

I would like to report QT for deliberately offsetting a LZ with a sub clan.  The sub clan in question is [F1_VP] F1_Vietnam_ Pirates

 

https://asia.wargaming.net/clans/wot/2000008747/players/#players&offset=0&limit=25&order=-role&timeframe=all&battle_type=default

 

This was done so QT didn't have 2 battles at the same time.  The result for QT: The clan defeated the [F1_VP]  F1_Vietnam_ Pirates clan in a landing tournament for the Agen province.

 

Surprise surprise F1_VP didn't turn up and it was a tech win for QT. Look forward to some IP checking, nuking and banning.

 

Can second a request into looking into this clan. Alot of the members are ex QT/VNF/VAF and alot from another clan of an almost identical name that is disbanded.(memory serves me correct the clan was disbanded for exactly this, alt offsetting)


Edited by Run_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, 19 February 2017 - 01:57 PM.

3Moe Tanks: VK28.01 (1st and most proud of), IS6

2Moe Tanks: Batchat 25T AP, T54light, 416, IS3, ScorpionRHM, RHM(15cm), WZ-132, T21, PZ IV H, M4, KV1s, 

Spoiler

 


Mobius99 #20 Posted 20 February 2017 - 02:58 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9962 battles
  • 241
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostHilly, on 19 February 2017 - 12:29 PM, said:

I would like to report QT for deliberately offsetting a LZ with a sub clan.  The sub clan in question is [F1_VP] F1_Vietnam_ Pirates

 

https://asia.wargaming.net/clans/wot/2000008747/players/#players&offset=0&limit=25&order=-role&timeframe=all&battle_type=default

 

This was done so QT didn't have 2 battles at the same time.  The result for QT: The clan defeated the [F1_VP]  F1_Vietnam_ Pirates clan in a landing tournament for the Agen province.

 

Surprise surprise F1_VP didn't turn up and it was a tech win for QT. Look forward to some IP checking, nuking and banning, as not sure how many times QT have had bans for offsetting, cheating now.

 

 

From server log, the clan only had 3 battles, 1 of which was tech lost to -QT while the other 2 ended normally.

Therefore it's considered as a common violation, will leave for auto system to handle for now.

 

View PostRun_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, on 19 February 2017 - 01:56 PM, said:

Can second a request into looking into this clan. Alot of the members are ex QT/VNF/VAF and alot from another clan of an almost identical name that is disbanded.(memory serves me correct the clan was disbanded for exactly this, alt offsetting)

 

Yes there are some players from other VN clans with a history, however no other direct link between these clans were found at the moment. 

 

We will keep an eye on the clan.

 

In addition, if F1_VP is caught in a similar incident again, sanction will be escalated and considered as 2nd offense.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users