Jump to content


Clanwars Season 5 rule violation reporting


  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

Napalmer #21 Posted 20 February 2017 - 06:04 PM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 34283 battles
  • 1,737
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012

Just had a game against F1_VP on the 9PM (GMT+11) landing for Arctic Region (Rheine) - F1_VP again didn't turn up.

 

Would like to have the investigation re-opened again. It's clear that this clan is not attempting to play Clan Wars.


Signature

The smell of Napalm...


xRainbowAssassinx #22 Posted 20 February 2017 - 06:07 PM

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 25100 battles
  • 1,204
  • [TIM] TIM
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostNapalmer, on 20 February 2017 - 06:04 PM, said:

Just had a game against F1_VP on the 9PM (GMT+11) landing for Arctic Region (Rheine) - F1_VP again didn't turn up.

 

Would like to have the investigation re-opened again. It's clear that this clan is not attempting to play Clan Wars.

 

There have been clans in the past such as SIAM1 that most of the time could not show up, but they kept trying to get numbers. This clan could legitimately be trying to get numbers but fails last minute. I know for a fact today we fought EMPYR with 8 people and we have more members than F1_VP, the only violation is forfeiting and they get a strike for that, so its basically already dealt with.

                

Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn                           

 


Mobius99 #23 Posted 21 February 2017 - 12:56 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostNapalmer, on 20 February 2017 - 06:04 PM, said:

Just had a game against F1_VP on the 9PM (GMT+11) landing for Arctic Region (Rheine) - F1_VP again didn't turn up.

 

Would like to have the investigation re-opened again. It's clear that this clan is not attempting to play Clan Wars.

 

If they are simply no show or can't make the numbers, then auto system will handle it, they will eventually locked by system if continue to do so.

If they are offsetting for specific clan, which I mean keep attacking specific owner provinces and no show, or deliberately win/lose to specific clans, then it's worth taking a deeper look.

 

So far there's nothing much they did other than tech lost to QT few days ago, so we will see if there's any other action/connection between those clans in the future.

 

 



IlDungNDlI #24 Posted 21 February 2017 - 10:43 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 19704 battles
  • 3
  • [VAF] VAF
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

A member of clan EOBRT use T22 med. This tank has been banned in WOT. This action is a violation of the charter of the game.Please review. Thanks!

 

Off-topic posting. Warning issued.

 

This thread is for reporting rule violations during Campaign 5

 

>Centurion_IRL


Edited by Centurion_IRL, 22 February 2017 - 02:33 AM.


JordyBro #25 Posted 26 February 2017 - 05:32 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 19414 battles
  • 860
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012

Battle vs VAF for Mont-De-Marsan province 

 

Two arty suiciding through drowning and shooting a wall. We are trying to achieve victory points. Them doing this are denying us points.

 

http://wotreplays.co...sonofnun-t110e4



Mobius99 #26 Posted 01 March 2017 - 03:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostJordyBro, on 26 February 2017 - 05:32 PM, said:

Battle vs VAF for Mont-De-Marsan province 

 

Two arty suiciding through drowning and shooting a wall. We are trying to achieve victory points. Them doing this are denying us points.

 

http://wotreplays.co...sonofnun-t110e4

 

The two players have been sanctioned as follow:

 

Clan VAF

 

Players in violation - 3 days game ban

 

BR,

Mobius99



Mobius99 #27 Posted 01 March 2017 - 06:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

VAF and -QT- were reported for suspicious action on Global Map, and both were requested to provide battle replays for further investigation on Feb 24th, unfortunately, both clans failed to provide requested info nor reply to explain for the suspicious action within given time.

 

Based on server logs, and the fact that both clans did not comply with official investigation requests, we have concluded both clans were in violation of Clanwars rules.

 

Considering there's multiple battles in question without proper explanation from both clan, members in both clans will receive sanction (including additional clan sanction) as follow:

 

All clan officers 14 days game ban/clan ban (perma-ed until game ban expire)

All members 3 days game ban

Both clans -20% overall VP

Rewards involving suspicious battles will be removed. (including leaderbaord award)

 

Dispute of this case can send via Support ticket or send to me directly ONLY.

 

Regards,

Mobius99


Edited by Mobius99, 06 March 2017 - 01:06 PM.
Updated Mar 6th


Atom_AriesArsenal #28 Posted 01 March 2017 - 08:22 PM

    Private

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 4473 battles
  • 7
  • [VAE] VAE
  • Member since:
    09-08-2016

View PostRun_Away_Brave_sir_Robin, on 19 February 2017 - 12:56 PM, said:

Can second a request into looking into this clan. Alot of the members are ex QT/VNF/VAF and alot from another clan of an almost identical name that is disbanded.(memory serves me correct the clan was disbanded for exactly this, alt offsetting)

 

I can't see any ex VN-F member in that clan. Most of them come from QT/VAF and NCS :(

 

This thread is ONLY for Clanwars rule violation reporting

 

Please stick to the main topic

 

>Centurion_IRL


Edited by Centurion_IRL, 02 March 2017 - 02:27 AM.


Mobius99 #29 Posted 06 March 2017 - 01:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Due to VAF and -QT-'s violation, TierX Week 3 Leaderboard ranking adjusted as follow:

 

Clan
Victory Points
Award
[GOLD] Guardian Of Legend Destroyer
61400 20000
 
   
[CROWN] Keep Calm and Carry On
47400 15000
 
   
[PYRO] Pyromaniacs 40655 10000
     
[-1AR-] 1st Armoured Regiment - Special Operations Division 37715 7500
     
[EOBRT] Extermination Of The Boundaries Retention Team 37680 5000

 

Clans will receive additional gold corresponding with this change.



Mobius99 #30 Posted 13 March 2017 - 06:15 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Following clan/player were sanctioned for unsportsmanlike conduct - Self-kill in clanwars battle:

 

Clan TL-VN

 

Player in violation - 3 days game ban

 

Regards,
Mobius99



Austins543 #31 Posted 18 March 2017 - 06:38 PM

    Private

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 14025 battles
  • 5
  • [TAM] TAM
  • Member since:
    05-31-2015

During Landing For land on Chernivtsi (Airfield) 2200 + 15 UTC + 13 Tier 6. Player Ibic Clan SUPER in M44, Last tank alive goes and drowns. Replay attached, Right at the end as he was last tank alive0.

 

Replay at http://wotreplays.co...9a346daa58b3fd3

 



Hilly #32 Posted 20 March 2017 - 04:26 PM

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 10933 battles
  • 1,885
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

Here we go again.  Sub Clan SGF used to make sure VAF or QT didn't have a battle in the first TZ of Clan Wars.  Blatantly used for offsetting. Chipped it with 10 secs to go, then couldn't turn up. 

 

 

The clan has 38 members, 15 active players, one person in Command. Commander came from VAF 16 days ago during the ban for rigging for VAF


Edited by Hilly, 20 March 2017 - 05:26 PM.

 

 

 

 



Pyromaniacs [PYRO] is recruiting now. Please email/pm me if you are interested.


Mobius99 #33 Posted 20 March 2017 - 06:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostHilly, on 20 March 2017 - 04:26 PM, said:

Here we go again.  Sub Clan SGF used to make sure VAF or QT didn't have a battle in the first TZ of Clan Wars.  Blatantly used for offsetting. Chipped it with 10 secs to go, then couldn't turn up. 

 

The clan has 38 members, 15 active players, one person in Command. Commander came from VAF 16 days ago during the ban for rigging for VAF

 

Nothing really doggy at the moment.

Will leave them as they are for now.

 

BR,

Mobius99



Mobius99 #34 Posted 22 March 2017 - 03:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostAustins543, on 18 March 2017 - 06:38 PM, said:

During Landing For land on Chernivtsi (Airfield) 2200 + 15 UTC + 13 Tier 6. Player Ibic Clan SUPER in M44, Last tank alive goes and drowns. Replay attached, Right at the end as he was last tank alive0.

 

Replay at http://wotreplays.co...9a346daa58b3fd3

 

 

After reviewed battle replays from both side, this case is considered as an accident.

No further action will be taken.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



Mobius99 #35 Posted 24 March 2017 - 07:09 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Following clan/player were sanctioned for unsportsmanlike conduct - Self-kill in clanwars battle:

 

Clan TL-VN

 

Player in violation - 7 days game ban (2nd offense)

 

Regards,

Mobius99



Dan_Quayle #36 Posted 02 April 2017 - 12:48 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 31251 battles
  • 16
  • [CROWN] CROWN
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

Yesterday [VN54] send 2 chips to our same prime time LZ, but they didn't come both battle. I don't know what they wanted to do, and I'm not sure it is constituted a rule violation. But anyway, I report about this.



Mobius99 #37 Posted 05 April 2017 - 08:21 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9898 battles
  • 191
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostDan_Quayle, on 02 April 2017 - 12:48 PM, said:

Yesterday [VN54] send 2 chips to our same prime time LZ, but they didn't come both battle. I don't know what they wanted to do, and I'm not sure it is constituted a rule violation. But anyway, I report about this.

Hi,

 

Case has been investigated.

 

Following clan/players were sanctioned for chip spamming on Global map:

 

Clan VN54

 

Clan officers - 7 days game ban.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



Hilly #38 Posted 09 April 2017 - 06:47 PM

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 10933 battles
  • 1,885
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

Like to report blatant offset or rigging. QT applied for a LZ against VAF (Land Owner) with 1AR.  They played 1AR a beat them.  See below.

 

 

Then QT have to play VAF 15 mins later.  Oh but VAF have another battle, so need two teams now. They won't be able turn up to the other battle, so just get QT to not turn up either.

 

 

In my opinion, VAF and QT are same players and then have in reality 3 battles, so just tech defeated the Mont Dr Marsan Battle. Please investigate.

 

 


Edited by Hilly, 09 April 2017 - 06:48 PM.

 

 

 

 



Pyromaniacs [PYRO] is recruiting now. Please email/pm me if you are interested.


D0DucHuy #39 Posted 10 April 2017 - 03:18 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 17234 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    06-23-2014

View PostHilly, on 09 April 2017 - 06:47 PM, said:

Like to report blatant offset or rigging. QT applied for a LZ against VAF (Land Owner) with 1AR.  They played 1AR a beat them.  See below.

 

 

Then QT have to play VAF 15 mins later.  Oh but VAF have another battle, so need two teams now. They won't be able turn up to the other battle, so just get QT to not turn up either.

 

 

In my opinion, VAF and QT are same players and then have in reality 3 battles, so just tech defeated the Mont Dr Marsan Battle. Please investigate.

 

 

 

Okay VAF player here. I speak on behalf of the clan (Mobius can confirmed on this due to prior engagements)

QT and VAF after the prior sanction against us have move separate ways. Our clan leader was at fault for not withdrawing the battle chip in time. And if there was any rigging, why did 1AR and QT draw so we did not get to loot Pyro gold?

 

And I'm just going to leave this here for good measure.

 

[Image redacted]

 

Before you post images from another players account please make sure you have their permission as it is against the EULA

 

Off-topic post. User warned

 

>Centurion_IRL


Edited by Centurion_IRL, 10 April 2017 - 12:10 PM.


Weebl #40 Posted 10 April 2017 - 04:36 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 14280 battles
  • 1,315
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    12-21-2012

View PostD0DucHuy, on 10 April 2017 - 07:18 AM, said:

 

Okay VAF player here. I speak on behalf of the clan (Mobius can confirmed on this due to prior engagements)

QT and VAF after the prior sanction against us have move separate ways. Our clan leader was at fault for not withdrawing the battle chip in time. And if there was any rigging, why did 1AR and QT draw so we did not get to loot Pyro gold?

Isn't this like the 5th time we have heard the 'yes we did do it before but we have learnt our lesson now and this one was completely different honest *bats eyelashes*' excuse?

 

Off-topic posting. User warned

 

>Centurion_IRL

 

 


Edited by Centurion_IRL, 10 April 2017 - 12:12 PM.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users