Jump to content


Clanwars Season 5 rule violation reporting


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
72 replies to this topic

Mobius99 #61 Posted 08 May 2017 - 04:48 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9969 battles
  • 281
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Based on reports from several clans and server log, VAF and QT have been found rigging Clanwars battles/fixing match on Global Map, both clans were given 48 hours to provide valid explanation and replay files, but both clans failed to do so within given time.

 

Since this is the 2nd major offense of both clans, sanction has been escalated as follow:

 

  • Clan officers - 30 days game ban.
  • Clan members - 7 days game ban.
  • Weekly leaderboard stage 8 gold reward revoked.
  • -50% clan VP (both tier X and VIII)
  • -100% influence point.

 

Note: -QT- and VAF commander offered explanation today, unfortunately, it's not sufficient to justify their action in this case.

 

For the record, both clans will be under detention status in upcoming season/event/campaign, further clan violation in upcoming season/event/campaign may see the clan disqualified for the rest of season/event/campaign without warning.

 

In addition, tier X weekly leaderboard stage 8 runner-up changed as following:

 

Ranking Clan
1
[GVN-D] GVN-Dragon
2
[VAE] Vietnam's Army Elite
3
[CROWN] Keep Calm and Carry On
4
[PYRO] Pyromaniacs
5
[GOLD] Guardian Of Legend Destroyer

 

Reward/Compensation will send to each clan respectively.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



Boys_Supper #62 Posted 08 May 2017 - 05:39 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 25016 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    03-27-2014

View PostMobius99, on 08 May 2017 - 04:48 PM, said:

Based on reports from several clans and server log, VAF and QT have been found rigging Clanwars battles/fixing match on Global Map, both clans were given 48 hours to provide valid explanation and replay files, but both clans failed to do so within given time.

 

Since this is the 2nd major offense of both clans, sanction has been escalated as follow:

 

  • Clan officers - 30 days game ban.
  • Clan members - 7 days game ban.
  • Weekly leaderboard stage 8 gold reward revoked.
  • -50% clan VP (both tier X and VIII)
  • -100% influence point.

 

Note: -QT- and VAF commander offered explanation today, unfortunately, it's not sufficient to justify their action in this case.

 

For the record, both clans will be under detention status in upcoming season/event/campaign, further clan violation in upcoming season/event/campaign may see the clan disqualified for the rest of season/event/campaign without warning.

 

In addition, tier X weekly leaderboard stage 8 runner-up changed as following:

 

Ranking Clan
1
[GVN-D] GVN-Dragon
2
[VAE] Vietnam's Army Elite
3
[CROWN] Keep Calm and Carry On
4
[PYRO] Pyromaniacs
5
[GOLD] Guardian Of Legend Destroyer

 

Reward/Compensation will send to each clan respectively.

 

Regards,

Mobius99

 

can not understand!
Despite the evidence that we did not violate, but still accused us!
Clan vietnam repost is not resolved!  

Bash_sh #63 Posted 08 May 2017 - 05:59 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 25684 battles
  • 894
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    05-25-2013

i feel for VAF and -QT-, i mean everybody always picks on them. :trollface:
and me being a part of a peace loving clan
here some flowers to make you guys feel better

 

Spoiler

 

 

Off topic posting, user warned
~Flying_Elite

Edited by Flying_Elite, 08 May 2017 - 06:46 PM.
moved picture into spoiler for tidiness


JordyBro #64 Posted 08 May 2017 - 06:15 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 20181 battles
  • 978
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012

TKKC were hitting every possible province with them. Well done again

 

Off topic posting, user warned
~Flying_Elite


Edited by Flying_Elite, 08 May 2017 - 06:45 PM.

 


SphinX_AU #65 Posted 08 May 2017 - 06:22 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 18406 battles
  • 84
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    02-22-2013

View PostBoys_Supper, on 08 May 2017 - 07:39 PM, said:

 

can not understand!
Despite the evidence that we did not violate, but still accused us!
Clan vietnam repost is not resolved!  

 

The evidence was pretty clear, QT and VAF drew at least 3 battles in a row on our provinces, and then one of these clans showed up with a team almost completely composed of tier 9 tanks.

 

T9s in T10 CWs isn't unheard of, but 3 draws, in a row, come on, even we're not good enough to intentionally draw 3 in a row. We tried to draw once, and completely crushed the opponent...

 

Off topic posting, user warned
~Flying_Elite

 


Edited by Flying_Elite, 08 May 2017 - 06:41 PM.


Flying_Elite #66 Posted 08 May 2017 - 06:39 PM

    Always blame Hema!

  • Forum Moderator
  • 24093 battles
  • 1,548
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

Unless you are reporting or repealing a violation, do not respond to this thread, thank you.

~Flying_Elite


   

Spoiler

Facebook | Youtube | Flying_Elite Forum Thread | WotLabs Stats | Best Ambush Skills Asia

3 MoE: Crusader

2 MoE: AMX 1390, Skorp G, T-34-3, T-34, T67, M53/M55, WZ-131, STRV m/42-57

NICE MEME

 


Mobius99 #67 Posted 08 May 2017 - 07:12 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9969 battles
  • 281
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostBoys_Supper, on 08 May 2017 - 05:39 PM, said:

can not understand!

Despite the evidence that we did not violate, but still accused us!
Clan vietnam repost is not resolved!  

 

Clans don't have draw battles very often in Clanwars battles, especially when there's 5 draw games within a week and all to the same clan. 

Sorry no, I would not consider it's logical regardless what you have told me.


And your battle replay doesn't support your explanation as NO NORMAL clan would choose to lemming heavies through 9-0 line on Fjords, then stay under the hill at D-9 to "defend", while the other clan "happen" to have most of their heavies on the hill top at C-9, again, sorry this is too unusual so that I couldn't take it as a valid evidence to prove your innocent.

 

As I have replied in your PM, please DO NOT try to take any short cut in Clanwars or try to play in grey area, it will definitely backfire someday.

 

Respect rules and other players.

 

This case is closed, further dispute will not be accepted.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



SkimsAU #68 Posted 15 May 2017 - 01:44 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 42880 battles
  • 321
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    10-05-2013
14.05.17 battle EMP vs HYENA on Lleida province, tech defeat for both teams, I understand how EMP received it, they had another battle at same time, but can WG check another Korean clan HYENA? why did they attack if they didn't have team? Or they are subclan of EMP and just delayed battle for them?

Mobius99 #69 Posted 15 May 2017 - 02:00 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9969 battles
  • 281
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostSkimsAU, on 15 May 2017 - 01:44 PM, said:

14.05.17 battle EMP vs HYENA on Lleida province, tech defeat for both teams, I understand how EMP received it, they had another battle at same time, but can WG check another Korean clan HYENA? why did they attack if they didn't have team? Or they are subclan of EMP and just delayed battle for them?

 

If it's only one battle, then we will not take any action as it can be a mistake or misunderstanding about Clanwars mechanism, technical defeat/draw will be handled by auto system, we will not step in unless the situation is worst than auto system can handle.

 

Please note that other than EMP who stayed in Asia server, many Korean clans from KR server have not been able to participate Clanwars for more than a year, they may need more time to familiar with current system and rules.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



113114 #70 Posted 18 May 2017 - 09:04 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 25758 battles
  • 1
  • [P-F] P-F
  • Member since:
    12-07-2013

On the AirField map AGILA family players committed suicide, not let us get points.

replays: http://wotreplays.co...114-vk_100_01_p

 

Similarly, in Cliff maps, CSR_B clan players also have non-sporting behavior.

replays: http://wotreplays.co...114-vk_100_01_p



Mobius99 #71 Posted 19 May 2017 - 12:13 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9969 battles
  • 281
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View Post113114, on 18 May 2017 - 09:04 PM, said:

On the AirField map AGILA family players committed suicide, not let us get points.

replays: http://wotreplays.co...114-vk_100_01_p

 

Similarly, in Cliff maps, CSR_B clan players also have non-sporting behavior.

replays: http://wotreplays.co...114-vk_100_01_p

 

Both cases have been investigated.

 

Regards,

Mobius99



SummoN14 #72 Posted 19 May 2017 - 10:44 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta-Tester
  • 42126 battles
  • 31
  • [PVP] PVP
  • Member since:
    10-05-2012

View PostMobius99, on 19 May 2017 - 04:13 AM, said:

 

Both cases have been investigated.

 

Regards,

Mobius99

Sir Mobius99 that time Ph internet having difficulty u can check forum for the complain u recieving from Philippine region. 1 tank only check this 1 http://wotreplays.co...-tankullet-is-3 and we dont complain



 

Mobius99 #73 Posted 22 May 2017 - 02:01 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 9969 battles
  • 281
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

View PostSummoN14, on 19 May 2017 - 10:44 PM, said:

Sir Mobius99 that time Ph internet having difficulty u can check forum for the complain u recieving from Philippine region. 1 tank only check this 1 http://wotreplays.co...-tankullet-is-3 and we dont complain

 

Your information is not related to the above AGILA case, therefore no changes to previous decision.

 

Regards,

Mobius99






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users