Jump to content


M36 Jackson vs M18 Hellcat. Which is better? (2017)

Slugger Jackson Hellcat Death Kitty

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

tuk0 #1 Posted 17 May 2017 - 03:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 995 battles
  • 21
  • Member since:
    09-03-2012

Which is better among the two?

 

I have the Wolverine and i just moved on to the Jackson. But I started this because i am having second thoughts.

 

Many players say the Hellcat is better because its faster and has better camo but I checked it out on paper and the gun handling is worse and the armor is so completely crap that my T7 Car can destroy it.

 

The Jackson is literally a turtle with a big boom stick. Slow, frontally well armored and has better gun handling. But camo is somewhat worse (by a hair) and the grind to the 90 is pretty hard. But it is really bouncy indeed armor-wise.

 

So, do I change my purchase?

Or do i keep the Jackson?

 

Debate below. 



MagicalFlyingFox #2 Posted 17 May 2017 - 03:17 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24590 battles
  • 10,258
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

Jackson hasn't been nerfed besides camo after firing. Hellcat got hit by the nerf-hammer multiple times. 

 

Jackson is probably better now.



JimmyJim #3 Posted 17 May 2017 - 03:19 PM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 47620 battles
  • 1,375
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    09-12-2012

Just keep tanks you like, different people have different impression of tanks we drive, if you like the tank just keep it. If you don't like just sell it.

 

Asking in the forum about tanks you like/dislike is like........... waste of time. I can spend a day telling you how bad a tank is, but end of the day it is you the person playing it that decide to keep the tank or not.


Edited by JimmyJim, 17 May 2017 - 03:19 PM.


Jarms #4 Posted 17 May 2017 - 03:25 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 13007 battles
  • 480
  • [-KO-] -KO-
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014
I wish they split the 90mm Hellcat from the historical Hellcat. They could have kept the old Hellcat mobility, removed the top gun and turret, then buffed the M1A1 76mm. They could have then added the 90mm Hellcat as a premium TD, which the US needs more of. 

LeSigh #5 Posted 17 May 2017 - 03:28 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 29158 battles
  • 4,051
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013
tbh the overall TD nerf was enough to reduce the Hellcat's ability back to tier 6 heavy and medium levels without the mobility nerfs which have made it almost unplayable.

TxTheBest #6 Posted 17 May 2017 - 04:42 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 17377 battles
  • 1,026
  • [HODOR] HODOR
  • Member since:
    10-24-2013
Jackson is much better.

signature.png 

 

"Hope is being able to see Light despite all the Darkness."

3 MOE Tanks(1) : M4 Sherman

2 MOE Tanks(9) : Cromwell, T-34-85, Panther 8.8, Churchill III, T-43, T37, KV-85, Pz. IV H, T32(Newest)


Inglorious_Aussie_Tanker #7 Posted 18 May 2017 - 08:19 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 9508 battles
  • 3,335
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

I remember when the Hellcat used to be like the T67, Fast, agile DEADLY......

Now it's just :arta:

 

The Jackson is BETTER, but then again thats not saying much in Comparision.


Vote NOW, to Wall up the Lakeville Valley Pass.

So Many Idiots.

So little Shells.


WarpZone #8 Posted 20 May 2017 - 12:18 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 6986 battles
  • 195
  • [RATZ] RATZ
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
after all the nerfs that the HC received, jackson is better now, 
although it's still up to you.

 


tuk0 #9 Posted 22 May 2017 - 06:24 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 995 battles
  • 21
  • Member since:
    09-03-2012

Jackson is so much fun! Those "miracle bounces" arent miracles to me, they are the norm. and it can pen those fearsome [Japanese] superheavies almost consistently.

 

Altho it IS slow.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users