24 replies to this topic

[MagicalFlyingFox]

-and make the LTs pay for it

 

 

http://www.vbaddict.net/statistics.php?tier=8&tanktype=0&nation=0&premium=0&modeid=0&team=0&battles=1000&groupby=0&fieldname=won_lost_ratio&server=

http://www.vbaddict.net/statistics.php?tier=9&tanktype=0&nation=0&premium=0&modeid=0&team=0&battles=1000&groupby=0&fieldname=won_lost_ratio&server=

http://www.vbaddict.net/statistics.php?tier=10&tanktype=0&nation=0&premium=0&modeid=0&team=0&battles=1000&groupby=0&fieldname=won_lost_ratio&server=

 

Oh its damn great alright. 

So lets make another

http://tanks.gg/tank/chrysler-gf/model

 

Actually. I give up. Welcome to 2017.

Edited by MagicalFlyingFox, 19 May 2017 - 05:07 PM.

[Ezz]

Weak spots are for games where skill matters. The 2 key is for games where the catering matters. Only freshly milked for the ZonE.

[DeadArashi]

All hail our Soviet overlords! May their lives be prosperous in their moon base! 

 

WG only cares about positive or neutral opinions... if you have a negative opinion about anything they produce...

 

 

 

Edited by DeadArashi, 19 May 2017 - 07:43 PM.

[Ezz]

Ever heard the joke about the snot rag and the map designer? I did but forgot the punch line and can't find where I saw it anywhere.

[mttspiii]

Won't it just be easier to roll back all penetration values by 10% and sprem penetration values by 30%?

[conquisador21]

Come to think of, QB made a review on Chrysler K. I didn't notice that he didn't mention the two machine gun ports that (in this tank is not a weakness, it's not even on the collision model), in the most of American HTs and TDs are its weakness. I wonder why? Maybe just maybe *puts tinfoil hat* he's p_ _ _ ? or he forgot it (probably he did on *purpose*).

Edited by conquisador21, 20 May 2017 - 01:28 AM.

[DeadArashi]

mttspiii, on 19 May 2017 - 11:33 PM, said:

Won't it just be easier to roll back all penetration values by 10% and sprem penetration values by 30%?

 

Honestly they need to do more then just nerf penetration, they need to do a full adjustment of their damage value based on the round type on top of the round penetration. Adjustments to the weapon handling would also be made and then maybe tank armor will be nerfed for tanks to their historical values because those historical values would be effective...

 

#DreamsAreCheapButWontFundAMoonBase

 

conquisador21, on 20 May 2017 - 03:10 AM, said:

Come to think of, QB made a review on Chrysler K. I didn't notice that he didn't mention the two machine gun ports that (in this tank is not a weakness, it's not even on the collision model), in the most of American HTs and TDs are its weakness. I wonder why? Maybe just maybe *puts tinfoil hat* he's p_ _ _ ? or he forgot it (probably he did on *purpose*).

 

I hate QB reviews on anything because he is either on the fence or in favor of it while never expressing any real major negativity. He just comes across as really biased in regards to all WG products. But in this case he does end up saying not to invest in buying the Chrysler K... which is nice

 

 

Edited by DeadArashi, 20 May 2017 - 05:13 AM.

[Politx_killer]

Dumbing down the game to cater to the masses was never so easy!

 

Balancing Tanks is all Luck™

[Roby1Kanobie]

Well at least there are no t10 p2w tanks yet.

 

[MagicalFlyingFox]

Its ok. We have these instead... 

 

[Gani_GANz]

Roby1Kanobie, on 20 May 2017 - 07:22 AM, said:

Well at least there are no t10 p2w tanks yet.

 

how if there will?

lol... gonna quit?

[Proloser_The_Atomistic]

Roby1Kanobie, on 20 May 2017 - 08:22 AM, said:

Well at least there are no t10 p2w tanks yet.

 

 

Agreed, the only thing keeping me playing WoT is the 9's and 10's. Anything else is simply not worth playing with all these [edited] p2w tanks.

Edited by Proloser, 20 May 2017 - 02:26 PM.

[Mother_Of_All_Rommel]

G_A_N_I, on 20 May 2017 - 02:22 PM, said:

how if there will?

lol... gonna quit?

Out of 10 who say that, only 1 will actually do it. So there's no real problem in putting T10 prem.

[DeadArashi]

at this point I'm sort of waiting for them to do what was done for WoWs. Tier 9 premium available for free exp only

[MrRez]

Ezz, on 19 May 2017 - 11:58 AM, said:

Ever heard the joke about the snot rag and the map designer? I did but forgot the punch line and can't find where I saw it anywhere.

 

Bless you! 

[WarpZone]

DeadArashi, on 20 May 2017 - 06:30 PM, said:

at this point I'm sort of waiting for them to do what was done for WoWs. Tier 9 premium available for free exp only

This I want to see 

[BabyGroot]

conquisador21, on 20 May 2017 - 01:10 AM, said:

Come to think of, QB made a review on Chrysler K. I didn't notice that he didn't mention the two machine gun ports that (in this tank is not a weakness, it's not even on the collision model), in the most of American HTs and TDs are its weakness. I wonder why? Maybe just maybe *puts tinfoil hat* he's p_ _ _ ? or he forgot it (probably he did on *purpose*).

DeadArashi, on 20 May 2017 - 05:12 AM, said:

I hate QB reviews on anything because he is either on the fence or in favor of it while never expressing any real major negativity. He just comes across as really biased in regards to all WG products. But in this case he does end up saying not to invest in buying the Chrysler K... which is nice

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugkhC-KCUKA

 

I haven't seen the chrystler review nor am i interested but maybe this QB vid will shed some light on where he stands.

[JimmyJim]

conquisador21, on 20 May 2017 - 01:10 AM, said:

Come to think of, QB made a review on Chrysler K. I didn't notice that he didn't mention the two machine gun ports that (in this tank is not a weakness, it's not even on the collision model), in the most of American HTs and TDs are its weakness. I wonder why? Maybe just maybe *puts tinfoil hat* he's p_ _ _ ? or he forgot it (probably he did on *purpose*).

 

I think QB did his review properly, he never mention the weakspot because it was never model by WG, so can you blame the person who review the tank and not model it for that?

 

He just did his review, show you the tank model, how it compares to the other similar prem tank and also some game play to show you how that tank perform, I think he did a pretty good and well thought review.

At the end of the review, his impression is neutral and said he thinks the Defender or Patriot is better than Chrysler if you watch the review till the end.

 

As QB said "Hater just gonna hate" and "Salt can be farm from whatever he said sometimes" so nobody cares anyway.

[Ezz]

Maybe because comparing to the defender or patriot simply perpetuates the problem rather than addresses it.

[MagicalFlyingFox]

JimmyJim, on 25 May 2017 - 02:25 AM, said:

 

I think QB did his review properly, he never mention the weakspot because it was never model by WG, so can you blame the person who review the tank and not model it for that?

 

He just did his review, show you the tank model, how it compares to the other similar prem tank and also some game play to show you how that tank perform, I think he did a pretty good and well thought review.

At the end of the review, his impression is neutral and said he thinks the Defender or Patriot is better than Chrysler if you watch the review till the end.

 

As QB said "Hater just gonna hate" and "Salt can be farm from whatever he said sometimes" so nobody cares anyway.

 

QB also was completely unprofessional in his video addressing Foch-gate, spending half his video acting like a [edited]-witt. 

QB also doesn't seem to realise what a NO WEAKSPOT tank frontally is capable of in the hands of a bad player (LOOK AT THE MAUS, LOOK AT THE VK100.01P). Quite simply, OP. Also flat out BETTER than the tech-tree counterpart which is a HUGE issue. 

 

But QB simply can't get that through his skull.  At least Jingle's understands and he barely plays the game.