Jump to content


Revolution?


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

xRainbowAssassinx #1 Posted 12 July 2017 - 09:20 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 30490 battles
  • 1,819
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2017/07/11/open-letter-from-ru-clan-representatives-to-the-world-of-tanks-administration/#more-52408

 

https://thedailybounce.net/2017/07/11/interview-with-contras-movement/

To put it short, there really needs to be massive improvements to the clan war map and an increase in feedback response. I think many others will think the same.

 

Thoughts?

 


Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS4, IS7, T57, Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Obj 140            

 


AKASHA178 #2 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:35 AM

    Smurfette

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 32511 battles
  • 5,555
  • [CRAZY] CRAZY
  • Member since:
    10-22-2012

View PostxRainbowAssassinx, on 12 July 2017 - 05:20 PM, said:

https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2017/07/11/open-letter-from-ru-clan-representatives-to-the-world-of-tanks-administration/#more-52408

 

https://thedailybounce.net/2017/07/11/interview-with-contras-movement/

To put it short, there really needs to be massive improvements to the clan war map and an increase in feedback response. I think many others will think the same.

 

Thoughts?

 

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.asia/index.php?/topic/28338-more-than-400-new-vehicles-are-still-planned-for-wot/page__st__320__p__1653759#entry1653759

:P


In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him.

more than 400 new vehicles are still planned for World of Tanks

 


JOC469 #3 Posted 13 July 2017 - 05:24 AM

    Carried by [KELLY]

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 65755 battles
  • 5,406
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    06-03-2012

What feedback haven't you gotten a response on?

 

CoAF said we don't want tier6 CW - WG ASIA delivers!


 

View PostSir_British, on 11 February 2016 - 11:24 PM, said:

joc469, the great purporter of  'name-changer' and 'clan-leaver' all hail the JOC469!


JOC469 #4 Posted 13 July 2017 - 05:24 AM

    Carried by [KELLY]

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 65755 battles
  • 5,406
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    06-03-2012
But feel free to use this as an excuse not to play tierX CW when the global map reopens.

 

View PostSir_British, on 11 February 2016 - 11:24 PM, said:

joc469, the great purporter of  'name-changer' and 'clan-leaver' all hail the JOC469!


xRainbowAssassinx #5 Posted 13 July 2017 - 09:47 AM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 30490 battles
  • 1,819
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostJOC469, on 13 July 2017 - 05:24 AM, said:

But feel free to use this as an excuse not to play tierX CW when the global map reopens.

 

I just wanted to see if anyone had opinions on what was happening.

 

An excuse, why would I need an excuse. If we want to do tier 10, then we will, if we don't, then we don't. :rolleyes:


Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS4, IS7, T57, Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Obj 140            

 


xRainbowAssassinx #6 Posted 17 July 2017 - 04:23 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 30490 battles
  • 1,819
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

https://lunawolfgami...world-of-tanks/

How will Asia react?


Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS4, IS7, T57, Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Obj 140            

 


tekno #7 Posted 17 July 2017 - 07:52 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 20785 battles
  • 551
  • [NZAD] NZAD
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012
I dunno how other clans/clan leaders feel, but here on the ASIA server we have direct access to a specialized CW manager(and other WG ASIA staff) via skype&forums, a custom CW rule set/map specifically tweaked for our needs/situation. So basically none of the gripes mentioned in the EU/RU rant are valid on our server. The map size/guld issue has been discussed to death..
Short version on that....we all need to figure a way/rule set that encourages/generates more participation then WG will throw more guld&provs at us.

I would like to see campaigns return rather than RB  fill the void.
Other than that.... CW has wayyy less issues than general balance/maps problems.


xRainbowAssassinx #8 Posted 17 July 2017 - 08:28 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 30490 battles
  • 1,819
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

Did you see the gold that EU could earn? One province was like 10x Asias. Their gold pots were MASSIVE. Thats just one thing I noticed.

 

The map rotation we had was shit, the amount of space was shit, the layout was quite shit. The uniqueness was terrible, bringing nothing new to the table each season, thats whats trying to be addressed. If the clan population and amount of clans on the map is dying at such a FAST rate then there is something wrong, it isn't just luckTM


Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS4, IS7, T57, Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Obj 140            

 


tekno #9 Posted 17 July 2017 - 09:00 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 20785 battles
  • 551
  • [NZAD] NZAD
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012
Since weve had a cw manager for 1 season and it was a substatial improvement over the truly awful previous season. Im waiting until the map/rule set for this season is released before I get the pitchforks out. Although they arent far off TBH.
After the gold selling/farming debacle we were always going to be hammered hard for that one.
Plus I think we could muster what 30 tierX cw clans compared to RUs 300 in their protest group....hence our poor map.
Id like it to be better too, lets see what Max has come up with, try it, and work with him to improve it for the future.
CW is WHY we are all still playing the game but yes WG had better lift their game sharpish or risk losing their long term investors/customers. "Premium wars" is not how to generate long term income/players.

stewiejp #10 Posted 17 July 2017 - 09:05 PM

    #GetOnBoard

  • Community Contributor
  • 39229 battles
  • 1,440
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    06-30-2013

View PostxRainbowAssassinx, on 17 July 2017 - 10:28 PM, said:

Did you see the gold that EU could earn? One province was like 10x Asias. Their gold pots were MASSIVE. Thats just one thing I noticed.

 

Gold value is all based on participation as far as I know, even though if the gold payouts were raised one would imagine that would encourage participation - it simply doesn't work that way - need more clans to play before the amounts go up


                                                                                                                         stewiejp on youtube #getonboard

xRainbowAssassinx #11 Posted 17 July 2017 - 09:20 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 30490 battles
  • 1,819
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View Poststewiejp, on 17 July 2017 - 09:05 PM, said:

 

Gold value is all based on participation as far as I know, even though if the gold payouts were raised one would imagine that would encourage participation - it simply doesn't work that way - need more clans to play before the amounts go up

 

You can't get more clans to play, the way the current maps and clan wars are going though. It is not your job or mine to make people play this game. That is why WG needs to be encouraged in the right direction.

Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS4, IS7, T57, Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Obj 140            

 


Slydersneak #12 Posted 21 July 2017 - 03:56 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 53257 battles
  • 40
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012

View PostxRainbowAssassinx, on 12 July 2017 - 01:20 PM, said:

https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2017/07/11/open-letter-from-ru-clan-representatives-to-the-world-of-tanks-administration/#more-52408

 

https://thedailybounce.net/2017/07/11/interview-with-contras-movement/

To put it short, there really needs to be massive improvements to the clan war map and an increase in feedback response. I think many others will think the same.

 

Thoughts?

 

 

I actually agree with you there! frightening

 



xRainbowAssassinx #13 Posted 21 July 2017 - 04:04 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 30490 battles
  • 1,819
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostSlydersneak, on 21 July 2017 - 03:56 PM, said:

 

I actually agree with you there! frightening

 

 

:)

Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS4, IS7, T57, Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Obj 140            

 


JOC469 #14 Posted 22 July 2017 - 06:46 AM

    Carried by [KELLY]

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 65755 battles
  • 5,406
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    06-03-2012

WG will no doubt be doing their sums, looking at the revenue earned from CW active players/clans, and those that play for fun. I fear that we will find that the play for fun crowd are what pays for the game, and so a bunch of players getting salty about not enjoying CW will not get the outcome hey are hoping for.

What will happen is that a bunch of lesser clans/players will be given a chance to earn some gold on the map which they would have struggled to do previously. The stronger clans will then just become the gatekeepers of the map and control who can earn gold and who can't. Which is what we fought against on the ASIA server a few seasons ago.


 

View PostSir_British, on 11 February 2016 - 11:24 PM, said:

joc469, the great purporter of  'name-changer' and 'clan-leaver' all hail the JOC469!


tekno #15 Posted 22 July 2017 - 11:13 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 20785 battles
  • 551
  • [NZAD] NZAD
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012

CW players vs PFF player expenditure....that would be interesting to know...not that we ever will...

But I feel that CW is NEEDED....without CW there is no real incentive to progress up the tech trees...less need for prem tanks/account/free exp.

I enjoy CW...period...its what pretty much keeps me playing the game.


 

"What will happen is that a bunch of lesser clans/players will be given a chance to earn some gold on the map which they would have struggled to do previously"......the key word is CHANCE...if average joe percieves NO CHANCE...then we will always struggle for CW activity and only experience a reduction in GM income/provs.


 

" The stronger clans will then just become the gatekeepers of the map and control who can earn gold and who can't." which is exactly what CONTRAS is trying to organise(albeit as a temporary protest)......pass, been there fought against it.


 


 


 



Flying_Elite #16 Posted 23 July 2017 - 07:07 AM

    Always blame Hema!

  • Forum Moderator
  • 26056 battles
  • 1,734
  • [YETI] YETI
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

View PostxRainbowAssassinx, on 12 July 2017 - 11:20 PM, said:

https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2017/07/11/open-letter-from-ru-clan-representatives-to-the-world-of-tanks-administration/#more-52408

 

https://thedailybounce.net/2017/07/11/interview-with-contras-movement/

To put it short, there really needs to be massive improvements to the clan war map and an increase in feedback response. I think many others will think the same.

 

Thoughts?

 

 

You know there was discussion on this in the CoAF skype group, though your clan chose to leave it. There are improvements to the map as far as I am aware in the coming map, so we'll see just how much

   

  Flying_Elite Forum Thread | WotLabs 

Spoiler

 


xRainbowAssassinx #17 Posted 23 July 2017 - 09:19 AM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 30490 battles
  • 1,819
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostFlying_Elite, on 23 July 2017 - 07:07 AM, said:

 

 There are improvements to the map as far as I am aware in the coming map, so we'll see just how much

Yeah, i know there are improvements, but like you said "how much". Will it be enough? Because it seems to me, if this map isn't good enough, it would be the last season many clans ever play. If they haven't already left...


Edited by xRainbowAssassinx, 23 July 2017 - 09:19 AM.

Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS4, IS7, T57, Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Obj 140            

 


Flying_Elite #18 Posted 23 July 2017 - 10:00 AM

    Always blame Hema!

  • Forum Moderator
  • 26056 battles
  • 1,734
  • [YETI] YETI
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

View PostxRainbowAssassinx, on 23 July 2017 - 11:19 AM, said:

Yeah, i know there are improvements, but like you said "how much". Will it be enough? Because it seems to me, if this map isn't good enough, it would be the last season many clans ever play. If they haven't already left...

 

Well as far as I am aware if it isn't enough there are some clans joining together for the CONTRAS Asia section to lock down the map at all tiers in order to force the devs hands. 

 

 

 

   

  Flying_Elite Forum Thread | WotLabs 

Spoiler

 


struth #19 Posted 30 December 2017 - 12:01 PM

    Crikey

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 41329 battles
  • 1,917
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    10-17-2013

So did these "some clans" ever lock down the map to push their agendas?

 

Talk about listening to the minority






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users