Jump to content


Patch 0.9.19.1.2


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

Papa_Wiskey #1 Posted 11 August 2017 - 11:59 AM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 34798 battles
  • 57
  • [O_G] O_G
  • Member since:
    06-05-2015

On August 16, a new micropatch will come out 0.9.19.1.2. Meanwhile the SEA has not even implemented 0.9.19.1.1 that was released on other servers on July 20th. Why hasn't 0.9.19.1.1 been implemented on SEA, what makes SEA so special that it runs so far behind other servers? If I am not mistaken 0.9.19 was implemented three weeks after it was released in NA.

 

Is it because:

 

1. Technical issues specific to SEA? If so why? (Fugly anime tanks?)

2. WG SEA can't be bothered to implement technical fixes to the game covered by this patch?

3. Nobody told WG SEA there is a patch?

4. Other reasons?



Profanisaurus #2 Posted 11 August 2017 - 01:08 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 2010 battles
  • 3,089
  • [PBFG] PBFG
  • Member since:
    02-19-2013
5. It triggers DETOX players so Tan delayed it for comedy value.
Salt glorious salt : They can not do what they want with unclearly way.

0__lol__0 #3 Posted 11 August 2017 - 01:13 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 10888 battles
  • 566
  • Member since:
    05-07-2014

Maybe because we haven't exhausted complaining about the last patch? Juicing the frustration of each patch takes a little longer here maybe...

 

 


Gold Brother, glorious gold.

Puggsley #4 Posted 11 August 2017 - 02:05 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 54522 battles
  • 591
  • [T-C] T-C
  • Member since:
    04-03-2014
7. There were so many issues that they recognised when it was released on the other servers they decided to give us all a break and avoid it completely.

MagicalFlyingFox #5 Posted 11 August 2017 - 02:29 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24961 battles
  • 11,372
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012
6 ran away just like the gift tank for this anniversary. 

jessica_raven #6 Posted 11 August 2017 - 03:39 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 17251 battles
  • 1,537
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 11 August 2017 - 02:29 PM, said:

6 ran away just like the gift tank for this anniversary. 

7. then came back ingame as 100$ bundle tank


Wot.. Wot never change..

Otakubouzu #7 Posted 11 August 2017 - 04:39 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 14542 battles
  • 9,870
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

mmmmaybe because all 9.19.1.1 change is mashed together into 9.19.1 update in ASIA Server?

 

I mean, Micropatch 19.1.1 is released in 19/20th July, and ASIA 19.1 comes around same day?

 

 



Papa_Wiskey #8 Posted 11 August 2017 - 05:22 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 34798 battles
  • 57
  • [O_G] O_G
  • Member since:
    06-05-2015

View PostOtakubouzu, on 11 August 2017 - 08:39 AM, said:

mmmmaybe because all 9.19.1.1 change is mashed together into 9.19.1 update in ASIA Server?

 

I mean, Micropatch 19.1.1 is released in 19/20th July, and ASIA 19.1 comes around same day?

 

 

 

Maybe, but if so shouldn't we be informed?

Napalmer #9 Posted 11 August 2017 - 05:37 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 35578 battles
  • 2,044
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012
It's a micropatch... does it really matter?

3-Marked Tanks: Chaffee, T37, AMX 12T, Cromwell, IS-3, T-54

Signature

The smell of Napalm...


stewiejp #10 Posted 11 August 2017 - 06:04 PM

    Captain

  • Community Contributor
  • 36341 battles
  • 1,345
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    06-30-2013

View PostOtakubouzu, on 11 August 2017 - 06:39 PM, said:

mmmmaybe because all 9.19.1.1 change is mashed together into 9.19.1 update in ASIA Server?

 

Yep, This

 

View PostPapa_Wiskey, on 11 August 2017 - 07:22 PM, said:

 

Maybe, but if so shouldn't we be informed?

 

Consider yourself informed.


                                                                                                                         stewiejp on youtube #getonboard

afoxq #11 Posted 11 August 2017 - 06:26 PM

    Ultimate LUCK Killstealer

  • Member
  • 32053 battles
  • 1,526
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    10-08-2012

View PostPapa_Wiskey, on 11 August 2017 - 05:22 PM, said:

 

Maybe, but if so shouldn't we be informed?

 

https://worldoftanks.asia/en/news/announcements/announcement-server-maintenance-27-july-2017/

 



Hmmmm ?


Survived the Bread & Butter Rektage of 2015/16

Survived the DPS Bus Apocalypse of 2014

Winning was is LUCK™


iDd_Sloth #12 Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:54 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 24041 battles
  • 788
  • [ANKOU] ANKOU
  • Member since:
    12-26-2014
It will get here when it gets here.

When an enemy Arty "one shots" 2 of your teams' heavies and you're in a heavy tank, you know you're screwed.

A heavy tank should have armor and a big gun, if you don't have either then you're not.


Papa_Wiskey #13 Posted 12 August 2017 - 02:07 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 34798 battles
  • 57
  • [O_G] O_G
  • Member since:
    06-05-2015

View Poststewiejp, on 11 August 2017 - 10:04 AM, said:

 

Consider yourself informed.

 

Thanks but why hasn't WG informed us, why not call the patch 0.19.1.1? That would make things crystal clear for everyone.

 

View PostNapalmer, on 11 August 2017 - 09:37 AM, said:

It's a micropatch... does it really matter?

 

Napa, are you saying that improving the game removing issues and bugs that exist doesn't matter?

wasaabi #14 Posted 12 August 2017 - 02:45 PM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 19689 battles
  • 5,510
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostPapa_Wiskey, on 12 August 2017 - 04:07 PM, said:

 

Thanks but why hasn't WG informed us

 

The link in the post above from afoxq was from the Asia server, how is that not informing players?


The Dude abides.

 
Spoiler

 


wasaabi #15 Posted 12 August 2017 - 02:46 PM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 19689 battles
  • 5,510
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

Moved to the appropriate forum.

 

~Wasaabi


The Dude abides.

 
Spoiler

 


MagicalFlyingFox #16 Posted 12 August 2017 - 06:32 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24961 battles
  • 11,372
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View PostPapa_Wiskey, on 12 August 2017 - 04:07 PM, said:

 

Thanks but why hasn't WG informed us, why not call the patch 0.19.1.1? That would make things crystal clear for everyone.

 

Wait what? 0.19.1.1? 

 

That just muddies the water. Some weird naming convention..



Papa_Wiskey #17 Posted 12 August 2017 - 10:40 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 34798 battles
  • 57
  • [O_G] O_G
  • Member since:
    06-05-2015

View Postwasaabi, on 12 August 2017 - 06:45 AM, said:

 

The link in the post above from afoxq was from the Asia server, how is that not informing players?

 

In what part of the post by afoxq or the link to WG did it say 9.19.1.1?

MagicalFlyingFox #18 Posted 13 August 2017 - 10:15 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 24961 battles
  • 11,372
  • [PYRO] PYRO
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

:facepalm:



Papa_Wiskey #19 Posted 13 August 2017 - 02:38 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 34798 battles
  • 57
  • [O_G] O_G
  • Member since:
    06-05-2015

For those of you just joining this thread the current patch of the game is what the rest of the world calls 0.9.19.1.1. WG SEA makes us feel special by using its own unique naming system of calling our patch 0.9.19.1 although WG have failed to confirm this stewiejp says it is, so it must be so. Meanwhile MagicalFlyingFox points out that WG informs us we had a patch called 0.9.19.1_2 that doesn't conform to any naming convention nor is the exe file named as this.

 

To sum up thank you WG for not making things clear, and for those of you in game who like to use xvm if you install the current version and rename the folders in mods and resmods from 0.9.19.1.1 to 0.9.19.1 you can use the current versions of this mod as well as other mods. I can confirm this works.



kl19442 #20 Posted 13 August 2017 - 03:04 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 4117 battles
  • 87
  • [BAMF] BAMF
  • Member since:
    11-25-2013

View Postjessica_raven, on 11 August 2017 - 05:39 PM, said:

7. then came back ingame as 100$ bundle tank

 

8. Then WG said they wouldn't sell it anymore after a week of the tank being in the premium shop. Then suddenly, it reappears as a black edition for $100 more :)

 

(Rare coloured video of stronk T-34 retreating despite of Stalin's "Not One Step Back" order) 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users