Jump to content


TD1 Blog: World of Tanks Perspective


  • Please log in to reply
94 replies to this topic

CardinalMite #81 Posted 17 February 2018 - 08:42 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 26514 battles
  • 874
  • Member since:
    04-18-2014

View Postjessica_raven, on 14 February 2018 - 03:13 PM, said:

Well, beating the shit out off other team are part of the game, and its just soft p2w, not total p2w. Since it wont make baddies a uni.

 

​No.. but the problem is it dumbs down the game and makes it more RNG dependent and less player skill dependent. RNG because the influence MM has on the outcome is heightened when it comes down to a roll of the dice whether the tier 8s (or insert tier you care about of choice) on your team versus the tier 8s on their team are the broken ones regardless of player skill.

 

Not completely of course but it is a further erosion of player skill being the major determination of who wins the match, along with 25% RNG on pen & damage and RNG on aim etc. etc.

 


“Holiday ops is balanced for Asia because a good player opening 11 boxes will get just as many decorations as a noob opening 75..”—.Murazor new head of global festive events.

Mother_Of_All_Rommel #82 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:17 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 19785 battles
  • 2,466
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostCardinalMite, on 17 February 2018 - 08:42 AM, said:

 

If you look at plyr base in general, most of them need luck over skill to perform well. So increasing luck influence ingame actually benefit plyrbase the most than increasing skill value.


''Ring around a rosie, a pocket full of posies, ashes, ashes, we all fall down..''

 

An Ultimate solution for gold and arty problem, hold your tears, and click here, salvation is near---

 


CardinalMite #83 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:25 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 26514 battles
  • 874
  • Member since:
    04-18-2014

View Postjessica_raven, on 17 February 2018 - 07:17 AM, said:

If you look at plyr base in general, most of them need luck over skill to perform well. So increasing luck influence ingame actually benefit plyrbase the most than increasing skill value.

That would only be true for any individual player if the increase in influence of RNG was always positive. Instead it just makes it harder for a player to get positive feedback from the game by increased win rate from doing good and improving tactical & strategic decisions. It will actually make it harder to improve as a player. 


“Holiday ops is balanced for Asia because a good player opening 11 boxes will get just as many decorations as a noob opening 75..”—.Murazor new head of global festive events.

Mother_Of_All_Rommel #84 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:52 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 19785 battles
  • 2,466
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostCardinalMite, on 17 February 2018 - 03:25 PM, said:

That would only be true for any individual player if the increase in influence of RNG was always positive. Instead it just makes it harder for a player to get positive feedback from the game by increased win rate from doing good and improving tactical & strategic decisions. It will actually make it harder to improve as a player. 

Thats true for plyr going up above 55%, luck tend to drag them down. But below that, especially 46-48, luck drag them up, winning more game for them. If we look at bigger pic, its a good thing overall, since its benefit lots of plyr.


''Ring around a rosie, a pocket full of posies, ashes, ashes, we all fall down..''

 

An Ultimate solution for gold and arty problem, hold your tears, and click here, salvation is near---

 


Ezz #85 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:59 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 60599 battles
  • 34,492
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
It benefits the masses at the expense of the competitive crowd. Depends what sort of game they are trying to make.

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

Currently moderating your English speaking community : AALGMadibaCenturion_NZ, Elite911, Moonbase Patrol Copter 7

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


Puggsley #86 Posted 19 February 2018 - 07:11 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 59617 battles
  • 1,126
  • [LEFT] LEFT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2014

I'm not so sure luck really helps bad players that much.

 

The main reasons why they are bad are things which are not at all luck dependent;

 

  • looking at minimap and understanding how to react
  • I'm in tank x - i have to go here
  • knowing when to exploit an opportunity
  • what tanks do the other side have and how do I respond to that.
  • map knowledge
  • weakpoint knowledge
  • spotting and camo mechanics


CardinalMite #87 Posted 19 February 2018 - 09:29 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 26514 battles
  • 874
  • Member since:
    04-18-2014

View Postjessica_raven, on 17 February 2018 - 07:52 AM, said:

Thats true for plyr going up above 55%, luck tend to drag them down. But below that, especially 46-48, luck drag them up, winning more game for them. If we look at bigger pic, its a good thing overall, since its benefit lots of plyr.

Not really, you might have a point with regards to RNG on what teams you get versus opposition on a macro level. But the RNG on individual actions won’t. It doesn’t matter if a noob occasionally gets  a lucky shot where they would high roll alpha or pen if they don’t know how to lead a shot. Or it does not matter if their shot goes dead centre on an inaccurate gun if they aren’t aiming at a weak spot. End of the day the odd damaging shot they get that they otherwise would not through luck is still just as prone to be adversely affected by bad luck pen/alpha/aim rolls. 

 

Either way I don’t see how this (increasing RNG) materially benefits the player base and I think it harms the game long term. 


“Holiday ops is balanced for Asia because a good player opening 11 boxes will get just as many decorations as a noob opening 75..”—.Murazor new head of global festive events.

TD1 #88 Posted 20 February 2018 - 05:14 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8706 battles
  • 570
  • Member since:
    10-05-2012

View PostTD1, on 14 February 2018 - 06:29 PM, said:

In my opinion, the main gripe with WG's games is that no matter how well you do, WG will spit on you by making you get very low scores if your team loses. Gaijin, as dangerous as bringing it up in a WG forum may be, is at least nice enough to give us a decent score if we did well even if the team loses a WT match.

 

@Ezz: If you guys think facing a T8 "broken" premium with a T8-T10 tank is difficult enough, you haven't seen T8-max games where the T8 machines that were nuisances become absolute nightmares especially head-on.

 

Just going to repeat this, but I think there would be less griping about RNG screwing up wins if WG at least made an effort to acknowledge that you did well in spite of your team's loss. Instead, due to the actions of a few bad decisions, the whole team has to suffer from the loss. I can understand them for not counting the extra EXP per day win on a loss, but really? Dragging down people's scores?

TD1 #89 Posted 31 March 2018 - 07:28 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8706 battles
  • 570
  • Member since:
    10-05-2012

Long time no post, because I'm back to playing World of Tanks, however tentatively.

 

I've seen the M6A2E1 on sale, and the standard package is quite well within my reach (it's only a few thousand Rp more expensive than the cost at which I bought the SP). Should I get it?



TD1 #90 Posted 04 April 2018 - 04:50 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8706 battles
  • 570
  • Member since:
    10-05-2012

I decided to go ahead and buy the Mutant 6, however my games in it have been quite difficult.

 

I've suffered at least 8 defeats in 10 battles in it, including one where an ELC EVEN 90 just stood there and did nothing to reset the cap while we were slaughtering all of the enemy team on the castle on Himmelsdorf. So far, I've pinpointed terrible camouflage as a primary weakness: The moment you get spotted in this thing, everyone proceeds to get crazy and slaughter you. Including, much to my wry amusement, artillery. 198 pen for a heavy tank is also quite anemic, and unlike the Foch Special Chrysler K, it does not have total frontal invulnerability unless you hulldown and show the bobble-head turret. Other shenanigans include getting killed by a T-54 due to bumrushing him, and a battle I lost but managed to complete the HT-15 mission on the StuG IV by absorbing damage alone. Srsly guys, stop trying to ding one of these things in the turret!

 

This month, my budget goes to PC Building Simulator and Ashes of the Singularity (the complete edition with DLCs and all that bells and whistles).



TD1 #91 Posted 09 May 2018 - 02:21 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8706 battles
  • 570
  • Member since:
    10-05-2012

Wow, the level of salt in this community can get disturbingly high. 

 

And I suspect most of it comes from the "serious business" people who hate things that allow a newbie to produce similar results to them (like arty and so-called low-skill-floor tanks). Like what happened in that other thread that mentioned SirFoch complaining about a tank with 57% WR that WG still calls balanced. Dunno if it's just me but I never want to throw a backdraft at WG everytime they do something, and like I mentioned in the other blog in WoWS, I don't buy into the OP accusations. Look, if you got owned by a tank, it more than not is likely your own fault and it would be best if you blamed it on yourself rather than anything/anyone else (if you do that, Storm told me, you'll never improve).



Sir_Direkin #92 Posted 09 May 2018 - 02:44 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 8889 battles
  • 1,093
  • Member since:
    12-16-2016

View PostTD1, on 09 May 2018 - 02:21 PM, said:

Wow, the level of salt in this community can get disturbingly high. 

 

And I suspect most of it comes from the "serious business" people who hate things that allow a newbie to produce similar results to them (like arty and so-called low-skill-floor tanks). Like what happened in that other thread that mentioned SirFoch complaining about a tank with 57% WR that WG still calls balanced. Dunno if it's just me but I never want to throw a backdraft at WG everytime they do something, and like I mentioned in the other blog in WoWS, I don't buy into the OP accusations. Look, if you got owned by a tank, it more than not is likely your own fault and it would be best if you blamed it on yourself rather than anything/anyone else (if you do that, Storm told me, you'll never improve).

 

I take it you've not had to fight one of these things yet.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumyqpRUeOPCy1RcKXl96VA

2nd MoE: AMX 12t, KV-85, M24 Chaffee, T-50


FramFramson #93 Posted 09 May 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 34688 battles
  • 3,128
  • Member since:
    02-22-2015

View PostTD1, on 09 May 2018 - 02:21 PM, said:

Wow, the level of salt in this community can get disturbingly high. 

 

And I suspect most of it comes from the "serious business" people who hate things that allow a newbie to produce similar results to them (like arty and so-called low-skill-floor tanks). Like what happened in that other thread that mentioned SirFoch complaining about a tank with 57% WR that WG still calls balanced. Dunno if it's just me but I never want to throw a backdraft at WG everytime they do something, and like I mentioned in the other blog in WoWS, I don't buy into the OP accusations. Look, if you got owned by a tank, it more than not is likely your own fault and it would be best if you blamed it on yourself rather than anything/anyone else (if you do that, Storm told me, you'll never improve).

 

While this is true most of the time, it's no excuse to be blind to things which are blatantly inequal or manipulative.

LT-playing masochist. It's too much fun to be a mosquito.


TD1 #94 Posted 09 May 2018 - 06:13 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8706 battles
  • 570
  • Member since:
    10-05-2012

View PostSir_Direkin, on 09 May 2018 - 06:44 AM, said:

 

I take it you've not had to fight one of these things yet.

I always try to find errors in my driving doctrine first rather than blame anything else, so there's that. I accept that if I die in battle, it's my own fault.

 

Then again I do not play any tier higher than 8 so maybe there's that. That and due to a disastrous streak in the past I'm down to 46.9% again.

 

@Fram: Its probably me trying to maintain a neutral perspective. To point, I personally think that while WG was wrong to react to the Foch scandal in such a way, if Foch had worded his criticism less harshly I can find it a lot easier to be on his side. As events dictate however, I refuse to take sides.



TD1 #95 Posted 16 May 2018 - 05:38 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 8706 battles
  • 570
  • Member since:
    10-05-2012

Just found this in the Graf Zeppelin thread (yeah I know WOWS, yada yada yada but they're stil WG games so it's relevan). Lert's post nicely sums up my stance on the Foch-gate scandal (involving SirFoch, WG EU, the Chrysler K and lots of profanity).

https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/134780-premium-ship-review-graf-zeppelin/?do=findComment&comment=3245566

 

Like I said once, it's okay to not like a company's product and take out harsh criticism on it, but make sure to:

1) Word it well. Don't make misunderstandings. The last thing needed from harsh criticism is misunderstandings.

2) PRESENT IT IN A CIVILIZED MANNER. Perhaps my main point. Had Foch kept all that raging in check it probably wouldn't be a scandal. He was like that before they made him CC? I call that a weak excuse. Just because you were born blunt and scathing (like I am in real life) doesn't mean you can't learn to keep it in check, especially in formal situations where it reflects badly. Doesn't help that his video includes "F*** WG" (iirc, correct me on this if I'm wrong), but really, that to me is just asking for trouble.

 

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users