Jump to content


Battle in APAC - FAQs


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
154 replies to this topic

Tanitha #141 Posted 05 December 2017 - 04:50 PM

    WOT Producer

  • Administrator
  • 4421 battles
  • 7,903
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    02-16-2012

View PostChieftain_NZ, on 05 December 2017 - 03:50 AM, said:

I got a Grosstracktor as well, but I was ANZ?

 

Hello.

As above, this tank was awarded for completing 20+ missions in all of the 4 weeks.
And not related to a country scoring.

 

Regards
Tan


 

Feel free to like my Wargaming Facebook Page WGTanitha

 

 


Pekcek #142 Posted 05 December 2017 - 04:52 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 8115 battles
  • 42
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012

Really I wasn't expecting anything but SEA to win based on the results.

Cheers ^^

Attached Files

  • Attached File   What.png   958.51K

Edited by Pekcek, 05 December 2017 - 04:53 PM.


Chieftain_NZ #143 Posted 05 December 2017 - 04:56 PM

    The Senate

  • Beta-Tester
  • 13969 battles
  • 1,524
  • Member since:
    09-29-2012

View PostTanitha, on 05 December 2017 - 08:50 PM, said:

 

Hello.

As above, this tank was awarded for completing 20+ missions in all of the 4 weeks.
And not related to a country scoring.

 

Regards
Tan

 

The confusion regarding the Grosstraktor comes from the original announcement.

Tankers on the winning team can also earn a  IIIg100_gtraktor_krupp_icon.svgGroßtraktor - Krupp  with at least 80 completed missions at 20 per week!

In which is specifically states that Tankers from the Winning team would get it, not everyone who completed 80 missions.


                                                                                                         AxcrVSP.jpg

                                                                                                         ​#ChieftainMk6.2018 ​#GetChiefaChieftain

             "We think that the Types don’t break the game, because they’re hard to play". - Actual Wargaming Dev's                                           

 


Tanitha #144 Posted 05 December 2017 - 05:19 PM

    WOT Producer

  • Administrator
  • 4421 battles
  • 7,903
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    02-16-2012

View PostChieftain_NZ, on 05 December 2017 - 04:56 PM, said:

 

The confusion regarding the Grosstraktor comes from the original announcement.

Tankers on the winning team can also earn a  IIIg100_gtraktor_krupp_icon.svgGroßtraktor - Krupp  with at least 80 completed missions at 20 per week!

In which is specifically states that Tankers from the Winning team would get it, not everyone who completed 80 missions.

 

Ahh makes sense, Thanks for the info.

 

Regards
Tan


 

Feel free to like my Wargaming Facebook Page WGTanitha

 

 


trekkatmunu #145 Posted 05 December 2017 - 05:58 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 14168 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    02-13-2016

View PostChieftain_NZ, on 05 December 2017 - 04:05 PM, said:

https://worldoftanks.asia/en/news/general-news/battleinapac-champions/

 

I must've been mere exp points off that Top 50. Icestorm1's highest exp is 100 more than my WZ-111 1-4 Battle, and there are 2 players below him.

 

Damn. 

 

Hold up. 1. Winhui_King

Account Created September 25th.

11,332 battles since then. No way. 

 

 

I got 1825 base xp and i still couldn't get it :( 
 


Edited by trekkatmunu, 05 December 2017 - 05:58 PM.


3HitKO #146 Posted 05 December 2017 - 07:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 4397 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostTanitha, on 05 December 2017 - 04:45 PM, said:

 

Weekly awards are based on that week only, overall are based on all 4 weeks combined.

So strong participation for all 4 weeks, is the key to winning the overall.. and players not participating in all 4 weeks would hider that overall score.

 

Regards
Tan

 

Erm sorry, I don't quite understand on this "overall score" part, since the winner for Week 1-4 were taken by SEA, so the average battles scores are supposed to be higher than JAPAN right? 

Please elaborate further on how WG declare the winner based on "overall score"

 

Thank you.



pokeranger24 #147 Posted 05 December 2017 - 08:00 PM

    Dark Meister of Tanks

  • Member
  • 8855 battles
  • 774
  • [SPIDA] SPIDA
  • Member since:
    11-04-2016

View Post3HitKO, on 05 December 2017 - 07:49 PM, said:

 

Erm sorry, I don't quite understand on this "overall score" part, since the winner for Week 1-4 were taken by SEA, so the average battles scores are supposed to be higher than JAPAN right? 

Please elaborate further on how WG declare the winner based on "overall score"

 

Thank you.

 

Probably has to do with win rate, highest experience earned by players, and highest damage dealt rather than number of token earned by the country by which SEA wins

 

its Quality over Quantity

 

if I am not wrong......


Edited by pokeranger24, 05 December 2017 - 09:57 PM.

The Great Overlords of Wargaming have bestowed me with the title of Dark Meister of Tanks, The controller of RNG and MM

 

You must shout my name if you want favorable RNG and MM


Pekcek #148 Posted 05 December 2017 - 08:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 8115 battles
  • 42
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012

Yup, so SEA win 4 weeks in a row but overall we lost? WG please do enlighten the folks on how you guys do actually compute the figures or use what as a basis?.

 



biggie3 #149 Posted 05 December 2017 - 09:02 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 4607 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    04-12-2017

View PostTanitha, on 05 December 2017 - 04:50 PM, said:

 

Hello.

As above, this tank was awarded for completing 20+ missions in all of the 4 weeks.
And not related to a country scoring.

 

Regards
Tan

 

i completed 20 ... but i didnt get it ... 

 

EIDT :

ahh just read it again ... completed 20 missions  EACH week ... and apparently i didnt register the first week ... so i lose out on the ac4 and also this grosstraktor ...  ok fair enough .

 


Edited by biggie3, 05 December 2017 - 09:32 PM.


NgvHo97 #150 Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:28 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 6442 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    07-19-2014
SEA didn't manage get top cuz there are some so called smart guys join in the APAC late or Miss a few weeks of APAC weekly missions. In terms of average weekly mission done we rank top cuz we did the most missions in each week by each player. However the overall average missions done (total of all 4weeks) SEA failed to get top. For example, Japan has 100 players joined tis mission, n all of them completed 25each week, so nailed them 100for average missions done per player in tis APAC. For SEA however, 200 joined the first week n all of them completed 30 missions each week but there are some dragers tat join in APAC in second week or third even fourth.ie, 200joined for third week n did all the missions until the fourth week but they already miss the first n second week of total 60missions.which the average missions done per player in the overall event is only 90. Over here we understand tat SEA players manage to complete 30 missions every week n be top but SEA still lost bcuz of the inconsistent participants. Remind again tat the statistic used above is for explaination only.

Tanitha #151 Posted 06 December 2017 - 12:50 AM

    WOT Producer

  • Administrator
  • 4421 battles
  • 7,903
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    02-16-2012

View PostPekcek, on 05 December 2017 - 08:54 PM, said:

Yup, so SEA win 4 weeks in a row but overall we lost? WG please do enlighten the folks on how you guys do actually compute the figures or use what as a basis?.

 

Yeah I understand, I said the same thing a week ago when the results were done. : )

The overall winners are based on the players scores over the 4 week period ...

The weekly scoring only looked at that week's players and that week's scores.

 

So for example.

If you had 10 SEA players score 100 in week 1.
And then in week 2, the week 1 players didn't play, and 10 different SEA players scored 100 in week 2.
Then they win week 1, and 2, with scores of 100 for week 1 (10 per W1 players) and week 2 (10 per W2 players)..

As weekly awards only look at that week.

 

However, for overall.

SEA had 20 players, and scored 200 , 10 a player..

 

OR..

 

If you had 10 Japan players score 90 in week 1.
And then in week 2, the week 1 players continued to play, and scored 90 in week 2.
Then they don't win week 1, or week 2.. As they only scored 9 per W1 player in week 1, and 9 per W2 player in week 2..
As weekly awards only look at that week.

 

However, for overall.

Japan had 10 players in the whole period, and scored 180 in the whole period , 18 a player..

So overall japan would win at 18 points a player over the whole event..

Even though they didn't win week 1, or week 2..

 

The overall winning country, favours players, playing well for 4 weeks.Which is why its an "overall"

Week awards, only looked and who was playing that week, and their scores for that week.

 

Regards
Tan


 

Feel free to like my Wargaming Facebook Page WGTanitha

 

 


Tanitha #152 Posted 06 December 2017 - 01:05 AM

    WOT Producer

  • Administrator
  • 4421 battles
  • 7,903
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    02-16-2012

View PostNgvHo97, on 05 December 2017 - 10:28 PM, said:

SEA didn't manage get top cuz there are some so called smart guys join in the APAC late or Miss a few weeks of APAC weekly missions. In terms of average weekly mission done we rank top cuz we did the most missions in each week by each player. However the overall average missions done (total of all 4weeks) SEA failed to get top. For example, Japan has 100 players joined tis mission, n all of them completed 25each week, so nailed them 100for average missions done per player in tis APAC. For SEA however, 200 joined the first week n all of them completed 30 missions each week but there are some dragers tat join in APAC in second week or third even fourth.ie, 200joined for third week n did all the missions until the fourth week but they already miss the first n second week of total 60missions.which the average missions done per player in the overall event is only 90. Over here we understand tat SEA players manage to complete 30 missions every week n be top but SEA still lost bcuz of the inconsistent participants. Remind again tat the statistic used above is for explaination only.

 

Yeah kinda the same as I wrote :)

Week just looks at the week, overall looks at all 4 weeks.

A player playing really well for just 1 week, helps win that week, but helps lose the overall since for 3 weeks they score 0.

But they don't affect the other "weeks" as they didn't participate in that "week"


And all in all, most prizes and the big prizes were individual..

The winning country, was mainly providing an extra bonus to the individual prizes and some national pride.

 

Regards
Tan


 

Feel free to like my Wargaming Facebook Page WGTanitha

 

 


Pekcek #153 Posted 06 December 2017 - 10:57 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 8115 battles
  • 42
  • Member since:
    08-05-2012

Right.. So having more players that participated in the event for 4 weeks Aka 1000 players on rotation for 4 weeks (250 each) is penalized compared to having 100 same players that played in the 4 weeks.

I can get this logic now but dont make sense to me.

The per player calculations was already included weekly to remove quantity bias, but then again to use the total players for the entirety of the event to further average out the totals seems weird?

 

Just trying to understand how the logic works for some of this events =P

 

 

Event was nice tho so please do keep it up.

Way to go!

Regards,

Pekcek

 

PS But really 11K battles in 4 weeks? more than the games i played in 5 months!



Tanitha #154 Posted 06 December 2017 - 01:19 PM

    WOT Producer

  • Administrator
  • 4421 battles
  • 7,903
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    02-16-2012

View PostPekcek, on 06 December 2017 - 10:57 AM, said:

Right.. So having more players that participated in the event for 4 weeks Aka 1000 players on rotation for 4 weeks (250 each) is penalized compared to having 100 same players that played in the 4 weeks.

I can get this logic now but dont make sense to me.

 

Probably better for you to look at it as .. if what you said happened in your example..Then the 1000 would have only played 1 of the 4 weeks, or 1/4 of the event.

Bit hard to be overall winners of an event, when not playing 3/4 of it.

The overall winners of the whole event, were encouraged with the structuring of the event ... to play the whole event.

IE The event encouraged participation in the event..

 

It was also structured to be fair, as in obviously it cant be the country that gets the most points, when the countries are vastly different sizes .. so needs to be on a per player basis.
With protection from exploitation also installed.

 

And.. With the majority of prizes (including the major prizes) like the Alpine Tiger, and the Gross, bring individual awards that needed to be earned by players.

And not related to simply what country players signed up for.

 

As for one alpine tiger winner having a large amount of games.
Please be reminded that the alpine tigers also needed to have the top base exp on the server over that month period.. IE played with highest skill levels on the server..

Not low exp botlike activity.

 

Regards
Tan

 


 

Feel free to like my Wargaming Facebook Page WGTanitha

 

 


JACKEL55 #155 Posted 06 December 2017 - 10:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 6803 battles
  • 19
  • [NSS] NSS
  • Member since:
    12-07-2016
Registration should have open for first week only.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users