5 replies to this topic

[DeadArashi]

So with the Obj 268 V4 on the horizon I thought I would compare the historical armor to the in-game armor... I regret doing that. See, Why unhistorically buff the Obj 268 V4 to force it into tier 10, but leave the Obj 263 with less then historical armor?

 

---

 

Obj 268 V4

Casement front: 180mm @ 40 deg = 280mm effective (326mm  in-game)

Casement Bevels: 160mm @ 70deg = 468mm effective from the front (646mm in-game), or @ 20deg = 170mm effective from the side (234mm in-game)

Sides: 90mm

UFP: 75mm @ 75deg = 290mm effective (386mm in-game)

Mid Frontal Plate: 180mm @ 30 deg = 208mm effective (335mm in-game)

LFP: 160mm @ 75deg = 378mm effective (386mm in-game)

Weight: 50t or less

Engine: 750

HP/T:  15

Spoiler

  

---

 

Obj 263

UFP: 300mm @ 55deg = 532mm effective

LFP: 150mm @ 33deg = 179mm effective 

Hull Side: 90mm (60mm in-game)

Casement Front: 250mm @ 43 deg = 342mm effective

Casement Sides: 70mm (80mm in-game)

Weight: 68t

Engine: 1,050

HP/T:  15.44

 

 

Edited by DeadArashi, 14 January 2018 - 01:10 PM.

[Kanna_The_Goldammo_Eater]

DeadArashi, on 14 January 2018 - 11:51 AM, said:

 

---

 

Obj 268 V4

Casement front: 180mm @ 40 deg = 280mm effective (326mm  in-game)

Casement Bevels: 160mm @ 70deg = 468mm effective from the front (646mm in-game), or @ 20deg = 170mm effective from the side (234mm in-game)

Sides: 90mm

UFP: 75mm @ 75deg = 290mm effective (386mm in-game)

Mid Frontal Plate: 180mm @ 30 deg = 208mm effective (335mm in-game)

LFP: 160mm @ 75deg = 378mm effective (386mm in-game)

Weight: 50t or less

Engine: 750

HP/T:  15

Spoiler

  

---

 

Obj 263

UFP: 300mm @ 55deg = 532mm effective

LFP: 150mm @ 33deg = 179mm effective 

Hull Side: 90mm (60mm in-game)

Casement Front: 250mm @ 43 deg = 342mm effective

Casement Sides: 70mm (80mm in-game)

Weight: 68t

Engine: 1,050

HP/T:  15.44

 

 

 

So, they nerfed tha tank that had decent quality to be tier 10 to be tier 9 and putting random shit with historically shitty armor, add steroids for it and called it "improvements" over dat shit?

 

man, dis feel likes Tortoise & Badger.

[DeadArashi]

It's funny how WG's mind works like that

[Kanna_The_Goldammo_Eater]

 

 

They (WG) said in this video that....

 

"It's (Object 263) a good vehicle, but not for Tier X."

 

So, a "good vehicle" for WG is random blueprint tanks that had biased unhistorical frontal armor with 600 - 750 alpha?

 

here's my respond to this 

 

Taken from my Youtube comment in this video (User : Kanna [censored]' Kamui)

You know why there's few Object 263 in the battle? That's because its predecessor suck [edited] and most of players gave up because they can't handle those crappy TDs. The Only way to boost this line's popularity is to reworking its predecessor. Just find something to replace SU-122-54 and putting it in tech tree, buff SU-101M and SU-101 to be more competitive in battles. Maybe putting that JE100's bootleg as alternate tier 10 choice like Chinese HT.

 

Damn WG, you know nothing.

Edited by Field_Marshal_Abe, 20 January 2018 - 05:25 PM.

[DeadArashi]

WG don't even understand the issue with the Obj 263 line, it's to be expected that they would [edited] up this badly

 

Edited by DeadArashi, 20 January 2018 - 05:33 PM.

[LeSigh]

The biggest indictment is that most think The 122-54 is a poor tank but the tier 9 263 is a worse by nearly every measure.

Way to completely stop a line being played.