Jump to content


Rise of Uk tech tree


  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

MagicalFlyingFox #21 Posted 25 January 2018 - 05:16 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 36066 battles
  • 13,961
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012
You don't get it. That doesn't matter in CW.

http://www.theuselessweb.com/

This account is proudly sponsored by Wargaming. 


EXterminateX #22 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:39 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostGani_GANz, on 21 January 2018 - 11:45 PM, said:

tanks you use for comparison have different characteristics and playstyle. so, the comparison is not valid.

 

considering your previous threads, it seems like you're not getting tired struggling for something which is obviously pointless.

 

what do you expect?

 

play a HT but its gameplay is MT. the only difference is that you have a hard turret but with trash front hull armor,poor mobility,big tank,lower DPM than any other MT.

Centurion AX is better than S conqueror.



EXterminateX #23 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:42 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostPuggsley, on 22 January 2018 - 10:14 AM, said:

A degraded 113?

 

IS7 perfect?

 

Arty is the only support tank in the game?

 

Amazing what conclusions can be reached when you have a tremendously solid understanding of the game..... 

 

How do you play S. conq? Ht or MT? 

that tank is no good. it had fake classification.



EXterminateX #24 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:42 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostPuggsley, on 22 January 2018 - 10:14 AM, said:

A degraded 113?

 

IS7 perfect?

 

Arty is the only support tank in the game?

 

Amazing what conclusions can be reached when you have a tremendously solid understanding of the game..... 

 

obviously you doesnt care about the game.

EXterminateX #25 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 22 January 2018 - 10:48 AM, said:

 

huehuehueheuhueheuheuheuehheuehueheheue 

 

 

 

 

This my friends is why you should actually get a super conq, 113 and IS-7 before you open your loud mouth.

 

 

Almost there. To one. :medal:

 

you should play conqueror and realize that even a tier 7 stock gun tank can pen in you in the front. anyway you dont care cause you are not using one. you are just using that loud mouth that you have. you hate my suggestions then leave.=D you are as loud and toxic as a derp gun.

EXterminateX #26 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:52 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostField_Marshal_Abe, on 22 January 2018 - 09:34 PM, said:

 

Paper stat padders, Explain THIS.

Spoiler
Spoiler

 

 

 

when its angled beside that is too low for HT. it can be still easily penned by other HT when you hulled down. 250 upper 110.



EXterminateX #27 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:53 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postpokeranger24, on 23 January 2018 - 04:20 AM, said:

 

Cant the mods stop him from creating new threads or merge all of his threads together ? there is no difference either way...... It will be easier for us......

 

I am getting tired of him .......

 

Seriously man.... the only UK tank that needs a buff is the Crusader, and it needs a sight buff on its pen since it got transformed from a LT to MT. Although I dont know how did I manage it ....... Crusader solely remains as the first ( and probably last ) tank that I got 2 MoE on and while its not too bad but it feels under-powered compared to the rest of tier 5 MTs 

 

hate my suggestions leave.would you?

EXterminateX #28 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:00 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostPuggsley, on 23 January 2018 - 09:05 AM, said:

If you look at tanks gg and show the 113 at the same angle as you show the S Conq the 113 has less hull armour.......

 

they got almost the same upper plate armor but look at that side armor of 113 its a beast.

 

113 can play on almost all maps because almost all WOT tanks got buildings while conq and S conq cant fight on those part. go hulldown somewhere? arty and TD will kill you if not die by being flank by autoloader or not Mt and Lt you are very slow on mobility even turret rotation



EXterminateX #29 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:13 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postmttspiii, on 24 January 2018 - 03:22 AM, said:

New French HT's still got nothing on SConq, Conq, and Caern.

 

Too early to tell how good the 705 line would be against the PzVII or the 215B though.

 

The pressure of facing the new French HT tier 9 and 10 is terrifying when you saw a conqueror and s conq its just 'meh'. either be useless in the town maps cause it cant sidescrape or be killed by arty,td,lt and mt on a hulldown position.

i already faced a Type 4 and 5 heavy while im on a hulldown. and he just thrown HE on my tank while he is angling and his HT teamates can pen my upper plate 4/5 shots using gold bullets.

 

new french HT got thick armor and fast mobility and good specific power it is not to be underestimate.

 



MagicalFlyingFox #30 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:18 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 36066 battles
  • 13,961
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View PostEXterminateX, on 24 February 2018 - 11:39 PM, said:

 

play a HT but its gameplay is MT. the only difference is that you have a hard turret but with trash front hull armor,poor mobility,big tank,lower DPM than any other MT.

Centurion AX is better than S conqueror.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

 

is this bloke serious?

View PostEXterminateX, on 24 February 2018 - 11:45 PM, said:

 

you should play conqueror and realize that even a tier 7 stock gun tank can pen in you in the front. anyway you dont care cause you are not using one. you are just using that loud mouth that you have. you hate my suggestions then leave.=D you are as loud and toxic as a derp gun.

Maybe you should play all the other tanks you've been saying is 'better than the conquerer'?

 


http://www.theuselessweb.com/

This account is proudly sponsored by Wargaming. 


EXterminateX #31 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 24 February 2018 - 09:18 PM, said:

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

 

is this bloke serious?

Maybe you should play all the other tanks you've been saying is 'better than the conquerer'?

 

 

already tried those tanks with the tanks of my brothers and cousins.

just leave this convo. =D better



MagicalFlyingFox #32 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:28 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 36066 battles
  • 13,961
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View PostEXterminateX, on 25 February 2018 - 12:26 AM, said:

 

already tried those tanks with the tanks of my brothers and cousins.

just leave this convo. =D better

 

And you are saying that like I haven't played the conq and sconq as well? 

 

You have literally no idea how to play those tanks and are complaining about how bad they are. 


http://www.theuselessweb.com/

This account is proudly sponsored by Wargaming. 


EXterminateX #33 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 24 February 2018 - 09:18 PM, said:

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

 

is this bloke serious?

Maybe you should play all the other tanks you've been saying is 'better than the conquerer'?

 

i think you should go play them 500 times straight games without stopping


Edited by EXterminateX, 24 February 2018 - 09:29 PM.


MagicalFlyingFox #34 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:29 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 36066 battles
  • 13,961
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View PostEXterminateX, on 25 February 2018 - 12:28 AM, said:

i think you should go play them 500 times

 

You have less than 4000 battles.

 

You have no right to be talking about that nonsense. 

 

 

haha so salty you commented on my profile.


Edited by MagicalFlyingFox, 24 February 2018 - 09:30 PM.

http://www.theuselessweb.com/

This account is proudly sponsored by Wargaming. 


OutCom #35 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:31 PM

    Own all the accounts

  • Member
  • 22961 battles
  • 506
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    11-17-2012

View PostEXterminateX, on 24 February 2018 - 11:28 PM, said:

i think you should go play them 500 times

 

You don't need to play a tank 500 times to realise how to play it. In fact, you should realise it after the first hundred or so games. If you still can't play it, why not watch how others play it? Because the conq and sconq are way easier to play than a lot of tier 10s

My accounts: er.... half of kac?

2MoE tanks: idfk, ask the others in kac who probably have a better idea than me

3MoE tanks: I'm a poor boi and 3 marking is actual soul destroying

Anti-stat padding is better than stat padding because at least then artillery won't go for you


MagicalFlyingFox #36 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:32 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 36066 battles
  • 13,961
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View PostOutCom, on 25 February 2018 - 12:31 AM, said:

 

You don't need to play a tank 500 times to realise how to play it. In fact, you should realise it after the first hundred or so games. If you still can't play it, why not watch how others play it? Because the conq and sconq are way easier to play than a lot of tier 10s

 

tbh it should really take around 10. 

http://www.theuselessweb.com/

This account is proudly sponsored by Wargaming. 


OutCom #37 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:34 PM

    Own all the accounts

  • Member
  • 22961 battles
  • 506
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    11-17-2012

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 24 February 2018 - 11:32 PM, said:

 

tbh it should really take around 10. 

 

 

Shhhh you gotta include those who may not be so fluent in playing tanks


My accounts: er.... half of kac?

2MoE tanks: idfk, ask the others in kac who probably have a better idea than me

3MoE tanks: I'm a poor boi and 3 marking is actual soul destroying

Anti-stat padding is better than stat padding because at least then artillery won't go for you


EXterminateX #38 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:39 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 24 February 2018 - 09:28 PM, said:

 

And you are saying that like I haven't played the conq and sconq as well? 

 

You have literally no idea how to play those tanks and are complaining about how bad they are. 

 

how bad they are create a training room go find a friend with a BDR G1 B let him hit your conqueror on the lower plate and realize that a tier V can pen it then all Tier VII can.

how bad they are create a training room go find a friend with a T-150 and let him hit your S.conqueror lower plate and realize that a tier 6 can pen it then all tier VIII can.

 

While Other Ht got a decent lower armor that is hardly penetrated by lower tiers -2 or -1.



MagicalFlyingFox #39 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:41 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 36066 battles
  • 13,961
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View PostEXterminateX, on 25 February 2018 - 12:39 AM, said:

 

how bad they are create a training room go find a friend with a BDR G1 B let him hit your conqueror on the lower plate and realize that a tier V can pen it then all Tier VII can.

how bad they are create a training room go find a friend with a T-150 and let him hit your S.conqueror lower plate and realize that a tier 6 can pen it then all tier VIII can.

 

While Other Ht got a decent lower armor that is hardly penetrated by lower tiers -2 or -1.

 

Then dont show your lower plate? Its a weakspot so play around it. 50mm or 100mm, doesnt matter at all since every other tank is going to pen it at that tier anyway.

 

 

Plus a BDR has a tier 7 gun anyway.

 

 

You're a 46%er complaining that a tank sucks because it has a weakspot and you're too stupid to realise you can actually park behind something so to hide it so they can't hit it...

Try penning a conq or a super conq in the turret with those tanks. 


Edited by MagicalFlyingFox, 24 February 2018 - 09:42 PM.

http://www.theuselessweb.com/

This account is proudly sponsored by Wargaming. 


EXterminateX #40 Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:46 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5635 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 24 February 2018 - 09:41 PM, said:

 

Then dont show your lower plate? Its a weakspot so play around it. 50mm or 100mm, doesnt matter at all since every other tank is going to pen it at that tier anyway.

 

 

Plus a BDR has a tier 7 gun anyway.

 

 

You're a 46%er complaining that a tank sucks because it has a weakspot and you're too stupid to realise you can actually park behind something so to hide it so they can't hit it...

Try penning a conq or a super conq in the turret with those tanks. 

 

talking about winrate again hahhahahaha this is my first and original account unlike yours.

talking about winrate if you got bad temper and poor gameplay you still sucks loud mouth MR.15% damage

relying on clanmates hahaha


Edited by EXterminateX, 24 February 2018 - 09:46 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users