Jump to content


1.0 Graphics settings vs FPS in game


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

wasaabi #1 Posted 28 March 2018 - 09:27 AM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 22141 battles
  • 6,675
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

You may have already seen the video guide to Graphics settings in 1.0 at the following link:

 

In addition some advice from WG on FPS issues: https://worldoftanks.asia/en/news/general-news/update-1-0-performance/

 

What I created this thread for however was for players to post their rig details and their settings, and what results they are achieving, particularly those users with mid spec or lower GPUs.  The next post is my settings and results.

 


The Dude abides.

 
Spoiler

 


wasaabi #2 Posted 28 March 2018 - 09:42 AM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 22141 battles
  • 6,675
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

System details from DxDiag:

 

        Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (10.0, Build 16299) (16299.rs3_release.170928-1534)
        Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-4690K CPU @ 3.50GHz (4 CPUs), ~3.5GHz
        Memory: 16384MB RAM
        DirectX Version: DirectX 12

        Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
        Display Memory: 10147 MB
        Dedicated Memory: 2017 MB
        Shared Memory: 8129 MB

 

Graphics settings

Spoiler

 

Results:  Approx 110 average fps, lowest seen 60 on Ruinberg (see image below) but only when most detail is being passed by.

Spoiler

 

As you can see it is a mid range card with 2GB dedicated memory, but it is using 8GB of system memory as well, so having 16GB on board helps.  It is not running at max or ultimate levels with most things but does achieve a satisfactory result.


The Dude abides.

 
Spoiler

 


Lee_Shawran #3 Posted 28 March 2018 - 10:55 AM

    The marshal of missions

  • Member
  • 53464 battles
  • 683
  • [GVN-D] GVN-D
  • Member since:
    04-01-2013

My computer:

CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G with Vega 8

Mainboard: Gigabyte AB350M Gaming 3

RAM: 8GB DDR4 Team Vulcan

SSD: WD Green 120GB

HDD: WD Blue 1TB 7200rpm

VGA: Colorful iCafe Nvidia GTX 1050Ti 4GB

 

I could play at maximum settings or at least ultra settings but it look like the graphics isn't optimized. The pre-rendering at the beginning of the map is still slow. There is also a stress time (in one second) then everything is normal. 

Finally, I set to medium and config some parameters, but I suggest turning off Motion Blur Effect, Enhanced Destruction Physics and lowering special extra effects.


"I'm a simple man, when I see a free premium tank, I grind, I take it"

 


Wolvenworks #4 Posted 29 March 2018 - 12:41 PM

    Member of the No Gold Shell Party.

  • Beta-Tester
  • 13296 battles
  • 1,379
  • [DONUT] DONUT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012
IIRC Ultra is 4k stuff right?


Sir_Direkin #5 Posted 30 March 2018 - 02:32 AM

    Purveyor of Salt

  • Member
  • 11942 battles
  • 1,303
  • [VERTX] VERTX
  • Member since:
    12-16-2016

View PostWolvenworks, on 29 March 2018 - 12:41 PM, said:

IIRC Ultra is 4k stuff right?

 

Nope, just all of the bells and whistles.

 

Have the game on Ultra, everything set to max except for grass in sniper mode. Playing at 1920x1080, and get an average of 165 fps.

 

System specs:

CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K 4GHz Quad core /hyper thread

GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX 1080 w/ 8 GB GDDR5

RAM: 32 GB DDR4

OS: Losedows 7 Ultimate (I only have it for gaming)

Primary drive: Samsung 950 Pro M.2 NVMe 512 GB

Secondary drive: Samsung 850 EVO SATA III 512 GB


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumyqpRUeOPCy1RcKXl96VA

2nd MoE: A15 Crusader, AMX 12t, KV-85, M6 Heavy, M10 Wolverine, M24 Chaffee, SU-85, T-34, T-50, T1 Heavy, VK 16.02 Leopard


Wolvenworks #6 Posted 30 March 2018 - 12:54 PM

    Member of the No Gold Shell Party.

  • Beta-Tester
  • 13296 battles
  • 1,379
  • [DONUT] DONUT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostSir_Direkin, on 30 March 2018 - 01:32 AM, said:

 

Nope, just all of the bells and whistles.

 

Have the game on Ultra, everything set to max except for grass in sniper mode. Playing at 1920x1080, and get an average of 165 fps.

 

System specs:

CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K 4GHz Quad core /hyper thread

GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX 1080 w/ 8 GB GDDR5

RAM: 32 GB DDR4

OS: Losedows 7 Ultimate (I only have it for gaming)

Primary drive: Samsung 950 Pro M.2 NVMe 512 GB

Secondary drive: Samsung 850 EVO SATA III 512 GB

 

pre-1.0, did notice that ultra textures massacred my frames from 120 to 60 tops, so i'd say it definetly is too heavy for my 1070. speaking of which, the indo subforum is getting a bit lively since a bunch of people are grumbling about their rigs getting frame drops when compared to pre-core.


_Hustler_One_ #7 Posted 08 July 2018 - 02:45 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 11490 battles
  • 13
  • Member since:
    09-28-2016

I played WoT on a weak laptop for gaming with AMD A10 CPU / RADEON R7 GPU / 6Gb RAM before.. It can run WoT on SD client with only low setting and 45 avg FPS. Since i gave my laptop to my wife for working, because her laptop is dead, so I built a new PC and just finished it yesterday, with following spec:

 

CPU : Intel i7 8700K

Mainboard : MSI Z370 PC Pro

GPU : MSI 1060 Gaming X 6Gb

RAM : Corsair Vengence LPX DDR4 2x8Gb 2666

SSD : Samsung 860 Evo SATA M.2 250Gb

PSU : Corsair TX-650M

Monitor : ASUS VG248QE 144Hz

OS : Windows 10 Pro 64

No overclocking! Just plug and play.

 

 

I was not so optimistic when i decided to go with GTX 1060 6Gb to run at least 80-90 FPS on HD client with full HD (1080p) Ultra setting. But, once i run the PC and move my WoT game files from the laptop to my new PC, run HD client, set to full HD resolution and all setting pushed to Ultra, aaaaand....BOOM! It run the game waaaaay beyond my expectation, it can reach 160 FPS maximum, and 96 FPS minimum, and solid in around 120 FPS consistently.

 

Sorry I cant upload a screenshot, because im too lazy to use other website only to upload a picture.. but Im not liying with my result, and i dont mean to brag my system, because im not a rich guy, I buy every parts 1-by-1 every month since Dec 2017, and finished yesterday.

 

This proved to me strong that WoT is true a CPU intensive rather than GPU intensive game! I think my FPS is boosted by i7 8700K rather than GTX 1060


Edited by _Hustler_One_, 08 July 2018 - 03:05 AM.


Jun_The_Antibureaucratic #8 Posted 27 July 2018 - 06:13 PM

    weewoo

  • Beta-Tester
  • 21960 battles
  • 35
  • [TEAL] TEAL
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

has an 8700K, Z370 motherboard, doesn't overclock, WoT is a CPU intensive game.

vBDs0kA.png


i do the spicEd mems


jwalm11 #9 Posted 17 April 2019 - 03:52 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 3746 battles
  • 1
  • [T_G_] T_G_
  • Member since:
    01-24-2013
For a free Steam gift go to http://steambonus.com 154332 people already got their gift cards!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users