Jump to content


Wargamimg please remove SPG from the game

spg arty artillery Arty Artillery Remove remove spg arty hacks

  • Please log in to reply
211 replies to this topic

Poll: Should SPG be in this game.? (97 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 20 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should SPG be in this game.?

  1. Yes (54 votes [55.67%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 55.67%

  2. No (43 votes [44.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 44.33%

Vote Hide poll

RITZ_GodSpeed #1 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:26 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

SPG nowadays are so irritating for any other class, not also that all other class needs skills and for SPG all it takes is just a click on a red tank, and every time there are 2 or 3 SPG in every match, also most of the time all SPG players prefer to focus single tank. so I wonder does WG wants all players to camp base.? all I want to say is if this SPG class will stay in this game for long they gonna lose so many player base from the game.

 

I am going to leave this game just because of the SPG, And those who agree with me please show your support in the comments

 

NO SPG or NO GAME


Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


Cronk #2 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:45 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 23899 battles
  • 2,273
  • Member since:
    07-02-2012

Block Quote

WG will just do whatever is needed to keep us on the gerbil wheel. Logic is just the beef they put on the pill to make the dog swallow it.

 

 


RITZ_GodSpeed #3 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015
thanks for the vote.. please share..

Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


pokeranger24 #4 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:56 PM

    Dark Meister of Tanks

  • Member
  • 9184 battles
  • 819
  • [SPIDA] SPIDA
  • Member since:
    11-04-2016

So a new thread for WoT 1.0 ?

 

As much as I hate SPG I also understand its usefulness so I think it shouldn't be removed


The Great Overlords of Wargaming have bestowed me with the Title of Dark Meister of Tanks, The controller of RNG and MM

 

Thou must shout my name if you want favorable RNG and MM


RITZ_GodSpeed #5 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:57 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

View Postpokeranger24, on 28 March 2018 - 01:26 PM, said:

So a new thread for WoT 1.0 ?

 

As much as I hate SPG I also understand its usefulness so I think it shouldn't be removed

 

useful for?

Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


Mystblade #6 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Corporal

  • Community Contributor
  • 10877 battles
  • 98
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

Don’t be so salty. SPGs are ok. Though maybe they could nerf tge splash / stun radius a bit. 

 

But are great for affecting hull down or hard to remove tanks from spots that would otherwise no OP and cause even more of a camp fest. 

 

I have no no love for arty  but you can mitigate their effect on you by where you play and how you play. 



RITZ_GodSpeed #7 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015
ok there is a debate that without arty HTs will push like boss but no there are TDs with good pen to counter them and also both teams will have hvy. so please.. don't event think about it...

Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


Nightlords #8 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:08 PM

    Space Batman

  • Member
  • 36950 battles
  • 161
  • [CHE] CHE
  • Member since:
    12-15-2012

Just freaking reduce splash and stun duration. Oh art missed by 5 meters, have 20 secs stun duration.

 

On the other hand please do not remove because I finally decided to do the Arty missions.



Mother_Of_All_Rommel #9 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:15 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 20172 battles
  • 2,602
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014
Those who dont prefer indirect fire unit in WoT pc could always turn to blitz. I got shot alot by spg, and had my fair share of using it. Not that i can avoid it or anything, but it dont really bother me much. Its a combat game, you get shot by indirect fire in tons of other combat game, this no different. Even the most active arty haters in forum still playing after years, so its not really a big problem thay could lead to plyrs leaving at considerable scale. Tbh, more plyr leave when arty no longer able to plat for a moment.

Anyone know how to put meme on sig, plss PM me, tq.


U12D13 #10 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:46 PM

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 34257 battles
  • 1,733
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    12-11-2013
Make stun time scale according to the shell flight travel time.

The longer it takes for the shell to hit the target, the longer the stun time/damage. (Historical note: Time-dependent multiple stage fuzes.)

In simple terms, arty is less effective up close and most effective against tanks furthest away from arty (aka campers)

#ProblemSolvedUCanThankMeLater.

I'm not good at this game, its just that the rest of the server sucks~

Casual Gaming: Apply for [ANKOU] today! Simple requirements: English speaking, Wn8 = 1000+ (nego-able), new players welcome!

Competitive Gaming: Come join in the [CALM/CROWN] family! Weekly Strongholds and CW~


MagicalFlyingFox #11 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:49 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 28360 battles
  • 13,052
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View PostU12D13, on 28 March 2018 - 07:46 PM, said:

Make stun time scale according to the shell flight travel time.

The longer it takes for the shell to hit the target, the longer the stun time/damage. (Historical note: Time-dependent multiple stage fuzes.)

In simple terms, arty is less effective up close and most effective against tanks furthest away from arty (aka campers)

#ProblemSolvedUCanThankMeLater.

 

Or we could just remove_arty_from_game

http://www.theuselessweb.com/

 A. Guy on 02 June 2018 - 12:40 AM, said:

Destroyer of Tier 6 CW... says it all about you.


U12D13 #12 Posted 28 March 2018 - 05:01 PM

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 34257 battles
  • 1,733
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    12-11-2013

View PostMagicalFlyingFox, on 28 March 2018 - 04:49 PM, said:

 

Or we could just remove_arty_from_game

 

The chairman of the buff arty society would not allow it to happen. We all know that.

(looks at Conan) 


I'm not good at this game, its just that the rest of the server sucks~

Casual Gaming: Apply for [ANKOU] today! Simple requirements: English speaking, Wn8 = 1000+ (nego-able), new players welcome!

Competitive Gaming: Come join in the [CALM/CROWN] family! Weekly Strongholds and CW~


RITZ_GodSpeed #13 Posted 28 March 2018 - 06:19 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

View PostMother_Of_All_Rommel, on 28 March 2018 - 01:45 PM, said:

Those who dont prefer indirect fire unit in WoT pc could always turn to blitz. I got shot alot by spg, and had my fair share of using it. Not that i can avoid it or anything, but it dont really bother me much. Its a combat game, you get shot by indirect fire in tons of other combat game, this no different. Even the most active arty haters in forum still playing after years, so its not really a big problem thay could lead to plyrs leaving at considerable scale. Tbh, more plyr leave when arty no longer able to plat for a moment.

 

but here we are not talking about blitz or other games mate..  its arty in WOT... that stun, that 3 arty focus, that splash, we are talking about these things.. 

Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


Mother_Of_All_Rommel #14 Posted 28 March 2018 - 06:51 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 20172 battles
  • 2,602
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostRITZ_GodSpeed, on 28 March 2018 - 06:19 PM, said:

 

but here we are not talking about blitz or other games mate..  its arty in WOT... that stun, that 3 arty focus, that splash, we are talking about these things.. 

My point on blitz is the option we have. As player, we can choose right? The arty, the stun, 3 arty focus, theres an option available to avoid it, no need to purge a whole class due to minority jaded plyrs who refuse to move on. Arty will stay in WoT pc, its valid to have indirect fire in combat game, nothing wrong with it. Focus fire are also normal in combat game.


Anyone know how to put meme on sig, plss PM me, tq.


RITZ_GodSpeed #15 Posted 28 March 2018 - 07:09 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

View PostMother_Of_All_Rommel, on 28 March 2018 - 04:21 PM, said:

My point on blitz is the option we have. As player, we can choose right? The arty, the stun, 3 arty focus, theres an option available to avoid it, no need to purge a whole class due to minority jaded plyrs who refuse to move on. Arty will stay in WoT pc, its valid to have indirect fire in combat game, nothing wrong with it. Focus fire are also normal in combat game.

 

"focus fire is normal in combat game" thats why we should not have arty.. atleast not as it is now...


Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


RITZ_GodSpeed #16 Posted 28 March 2018 - 07:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

View PostMother_Of_All_Rommel, on 28 March 2018 - 04:21 PM, said:

My point on blitz is the option we have. As player, we can choose right? The arty, the stun, 3 arty focus, theres an option available to avoid it, no need to purge a whole class due to minority jaded plyrs who refuse to move on. Arty will stay in WoT pc, its valid to have indirect fire in combat game, nothing wrong with it. Focus fire are also normal in combat game.

 

tell me the options you are talking about to avoid 3 arty focus

Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


Mother_Of_All_Rommel #17 Posted 28 March 2018 - 07:31 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 20172 battles
  • 2,602
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostRITZ_GodSpeed, on 28 March 2018 - 07:11 PM, said:

 

tell me the options you are talking about to avoid 3 arty focus

Play blitz. Its close to WoT, but no arty.


Anyone know how to put meme on sig, plss PM me, tq.


RITZ_GodSpeed #18 Posted 28 March 2018 - 07:35 PM

    Corporal

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 1772 battles
  • 39
  • [VEER] VEER
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

View PostMother_Of_All_Rommel, on 28 March 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:

Play blitz. Its close to WoT, but no arty.

 

good answer. now I am aware what an intelligent person I am talking with. #respect

Thanks and Regards,

RITZ_GodSpeed

Commander [VEER]


Mother_Of_All_Rommel #19 Posted 28 March 2018 - 07:43 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 20172 battles
  • 2,602
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostRITZ_GodSpeed, on 28 March 2018 - 07:35 PM, said:

 

good answer. now I am aware what an intelligent person I am talking with. #respect

Thats the only realistic option you have if you wanna WoT without arty, dont hate me, I have no say in WG boat. Sorry if you feels like im trying to smart arse my way here, im not.


Anyone know how to put meme on sig, plss PM me, tq.


Chewmatca #20 Posted 29 March 2018 - 05:47 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 13492 battles
  • 298
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012
3 arty is stupid, too easy to focus someone down top tier 30-40 second reload means 6 shots or more if theres an autoloading(!) frenchie there in a 40 second time frame - that is what is wrong with arty. Too much. Wargamings balance is so broken this is least of their issues. Crayon eaters rings so true, any one of the top players can tell you whats wrong with this game in 3 sentences, engage the community WG.





Also tagged with spg, arty, artillery, Arty, Artillery, Remove, remove, spg, arty, hacks

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users