Jump to content


test server 2684 still looks crazy


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

abigaiI #1 Posted 15 May 2018 - 02:12 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 21720 battles
  • 22
  • [EL_CN] EL_CN
  • Member since:
    03-15-2017

lowerlower plate armor nerf will not effect...mostly

 

cause lowerlower plate bounce most shells with how its angled not armor effectiveness

 

and hp/t ratio will be 18 which still nonsense for its armor

 

if they not gonna fix lowermid plate armor to 270~280 this tank shouldn't go full speed

 

or buff apcr/heat premammo to 350 like few clan war tanks


Edited by abigaiI, 15 May 2018 - 02:13 PM.


Proloser_The_Atomistic #2 Posted 15 May 2018 - 02:46 PM

    Pls buff Arty!11

  • Member
  • 25333 battles
  • 4,579
  • Member since:
    07-13-2014
Yeah its still OP.

ksthegreat91 #3 Posted 15 May 2018 - 02:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 8133 battles
  • 22
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

It's a bit suspicious that they brought out the "nerf" 2 days after Foch's rant spreading.

 

Probably fearing Foch 2.0?



Muds_Revenge #4 Posted 15 May 2018 - 03:35 PM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 31415 battles
  • 1,014
  • [NZAD] NZAD
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012
bring back wtfe-100 to fight it.

 



 


CelestiaLudenberg #5 Posted 15 May 2018 - 05:28 PM

    All The Red Pens

  • Member
  • 15224 battles
  • 536
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016

View PostMuds_Revenge, on 15 May 2018 - 07:35 PM, said:

bring back wtfe-100 to fight it.

 

Nah they need something that was actually built/tested. 

 

I personally recommend the Versuchsträger 1-2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VT_tank#Design

2, 6-round 120mm guns, that'd balance the damn thing out, and since it also has a 1480hp (2367 with the overdrive) and a top speed of 70km/h, the stupid 268 V4 couldn't run away from it either.


3 M.O.E Tanks: E-100, Leopard 1,  E-75, Leopard PT A, Type 61, Tiger II, Indien Panzer, STA-1, Jagdpanther, StuG III G.

2 M.O.E Tanks: Panzer VII, 113, E-50M, STB-1,  Mäuschen, VK 45.02 B, WZ-111 1-4, E-50, VK 100.01 P, VK 45.02 A, 110, Alpine Tiger, Schwarzpanzer 58, Type 59, Rheinmetall-Borsig Waffenträger, Rheinmetall Skorpion G, Tiger (P), VK 45.03, Panther, Chi-Ri, T-34-1, Steyr Waffenträger, Tiger 131, VK 36.01 H, VK 30.01 P, VK 30.01 D, VK 30.02 M, Chi-To, Type 58, Jagdpanzer IV, VK 28.01, Panzer IV H, Panzer III/IV.


kookookichoo #6 Posted 15 May 2018 - 05:34 PM

    the ginchiest

  • Member
  • 17169 battles
  • 296
  • [-2AR-] -2AR-
  • Member since:
    07-10-2016

how about an ontos to play with?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M50_Ontos



CelestiaLudenberg #7 Posted 15 May 2018 - 07:01 PM

    All The Red Pens

  • Member
  • 15224 battles
  • 536
  • [LIFE] LIFE
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016

View Postkookookichoo, on 15 May 2018 - 09:34 PM, said:

how about an ontos to play with?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M50_Ontos

 

Eh.

 

The M40 recoilless rifle only had 300mm of pen with HEAT, so it wouldn't pen the 268 V4 except weakspots.


3 M.O.E Tanks: E-100, Leopard 1,  E-75, Leopard PT A, Type 61, Tiger II, Indien Panzer, STA-1, Jagdpanther, StuG III G.

2 M.O.E Tanks: Panzer VII, 113, E-50M, STB-1,  Mäuschen, VK 45.02 B, WZ-111 1-4, E-50, VK 100.01 P, VK 45.02 A, 110, Alpine Tiger, Schwarzpanzer 58, Type 59, Rheinmetall-Borsig Waffenträger, Rheinmetall Skorpion G, Tiger (P), VK 45.03, Panther, Chi-Ri, T-34-1, Steyr Waffenträger, Tiger 131, VK 36.01 H, VK 30.01 P, VK 30.01 D, VK 30.02 M, Chi-To, Type 58, Jagdpanzer IV, VK 28.01, Panzer IV H, Panzer III/IV.


kookookichoo #8 Posted 15 May 2018 - 08:35 PM

    the ginchiest

  • Member
  • 17169 battles
  • 296
  • [-2AR-] -2AR-
  • Member since:
    07-10-2016

View PostDefendingTheFatherland, on 15 May 2018 - 09:01 PM, said:

 

Eh.

 

The M40 recoilless rifle only had 300mm of pen with HEAT, so it wouldn't pen the 268 V4 except weakspots.

 

:(

mttspiii #9 Posted 16 May 2018 - 02:25 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 28483 battles
  • 16,386
  • [PVP] PVP
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View Postksthegreat91, on 15 May 2018 - 02:54 PM, said:

It's a bit suspicious that they brought out the "nerf" 2 days after Foch's rant spreading.

 

Probably fearing Foch 2.0?

 

Speaking of which, did the Foch 155 had this much mobility before?

I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 

 


MagicalFlyingFox #10 Posted 16 May 2018 - 01:39 PM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 27965 battles
  • 12,736
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

View Postmttspiii, on 16 May 2018 - 04:25 AM, said:

 

Speaking of which, did the Foch 155 had this much mobility before?

 

Foch 155 was slower but could turn a bit more. Also didn't have 225mm weakspots, it had actually pennable weakspots. 

It also however killed you in about 6 seconds. 


http://www.theuselessweb.com/

Free Gold

Whack-A-Defender Brigade 2018


TheBudgiesmuggler #11 Posted 16 May 2018 - 02:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 22505 battles
  • 151
  • [DOGS-] DOGS-
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

There's tanks out there that are so OP its a joke.....compare the lower plate on the heavy hitter JPZ e100 236 mm as opposed to the 268v4's formidable 319 mm lower plate, its plainly obvious (no tin foil hat required) Wargaming bias to all other flags...

 



Mother_Of_All_Rommel #12 Posted 16 May 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 19785 battles
  • 2,466
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014
Wait till the new rusky HT above T-10 arrive. It will make 5A looks like a 3 legged cat :P

''Ring around a rosie, a pocket full of posies, ashes, ashes, we all fall down..''

 

An Ultimate solution for gold and arty problem, hold your tears, and click here, salvation is near---

 


ksthegreat91 #13 Posted 16 May 2018 - 05:35 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 8133 battles
  • 22
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View PostMother_Of_All_Rommel, on 16 May 2018 - 06:53 AM, said:

Wait till the new rusky HT above T-10 arrive. It will make 5A looks like a 3 legged cat :P

 

You see comrade the 5A is "historically" a copy of our glorious Objekt 277. So logically it is not blessed by Stalin himself.

Edited by ksthegreat91, 16 May 2018 - 06:34 PM.


M1_1Abrams #14 Posted 16 May 2018 - 07:38 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 5573 battles
  • 56
  • [INA] INA
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017
I think the cupola should be nerfed to 220 mm of effective armour. I do pen the lower lower plate in Ridgelines with my t44 with standard rounds at the moment but..all nerfs are welcome. BTW pls don't over nerf it, keep it a bit op for the sake of its role in combat.

Puggsley #15 Posted 17 May 2018 - 10:57 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 59617 battles
  • 1,126
  • [LEFT] LEFT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2014
Its Russian, the overnerf bat will stay in the bag for sure.

Quasinerdo #16 Posted 18 May 2018 - 11:41 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta-Tester
  • 16695 battles
  • 796
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    09-17-2012

Hint at a nerf being considered, provide a little nerf and allow rumours to encourage players to rush in and free xp their OP tank before further nerfs arrive. 

 

WG won't do jack $hit until this hurts their wallet.



 

 KraftLawrence - "Don’t be that guy camping and doing nothing while your team dies on another flank – then farm 3k damage and complain your team sucks. That guy is the worst."





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users