Jump to content


Hong Kong Server Move Thread

Singapore Oceania Australia New Zealand Server Hong Kong Server

  • Please log in to reply
666 replies to this topic

Scrubba #401 Posted 11 July 2018 - 04:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 29916 battles
  • 167
  • Member since:
    08-06-2013
Tan, any chance of posting a list of the ISPs you're currently working with so people know whether to hassle WG support / their ISP? I'm one of the unlucky ones getting routed through Japan from Australia atm and enjoying 280-300 ping..


struth #402 Posted 11 July 2018 - 04:27 PM

    Crikey

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 43073 battles
  • 1,983
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    10-17-2013

View PostNapalmer, on 11 July 2018 - 04:59 PM, said:

My favourite part about this thread isn't that there's so many people whining when all they have to do is contact their ISP or send Tan their pingplotters.

 

It's the fact that in a week everything will be fixed, and all the players threatening 'drastic action' will have better ping than before.

 

:teethhappy:

 

Who would you suggest I contact at Optus?

Scrubba #403 Posted 11 July 2018 - 04:31 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 29916 battles
  • 167
  • Member since:
    08-06-2013

View Poststruth, on 11 July 2018 - 05:57 PM, said:

 

Who would you suggest I contact at Optus?

 

That original guy you spoke to at Optus seemed pretty good, surprised he didnt get it sorted for you :teethhappy:


Proloser_The_Atomistic #404 Posted 11 July 2018 - 04:48 PM

    Pls buff Arty!11

  • Member
  • 25641 battles
  • 4,611
  • Member since:
    07-13-2014

View PostScrubba, on 11 July 2018 - 04:23 PM, said:

Tan, any chance of posting a list of the ISPs you're currently working with so people know whether to hassle WG support / their ISP? I'm one of the unlucky ones getting routed through Japan from Australia atm and enjoying 280-300 ping..

 

Me too. 310ms from WA. 

Aoyama_Blue_Mountain #405 Posted 11 July 2018 - 05:00 PM

    Is the order a blue mountain?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 66578 battles
  • 7,138
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

Korean getting 150ms

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.asia/index.php?/topic/81252-축구하는데-핑이-150ms임-ㅋㅋㅋㅋ/

 

"Delivering better connections overall"


You silence those who speak the truth, and you wonder why everyone is talking rubbish

You reward those who win by cheating, and you wonder why you can't produce people who can win while playing fairly

You punish people who put in effort to play, and you wonder why all who remain are the unmotivated


E65P #406 Posted 11 July 2018 - 05:06 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta-Tester
  • 19455 battles
  • 18
  • [T-N-B] T-N-B
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012
2018/07/11 17:02:36.906 
---- 本文件由 AtkkPing.exe 创建 -----
Ping from 192.168.137.1 to 92.223.52.23
==============================================================================
07/11 17:02:36.919         Ping to 92.223.52.23 with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
07/11 17:02:37.113  超时   #1 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:37.384 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.00ms
07/11 17:02:37.613  超时   #3 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:38.113  超时   #4 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:38.396         #5 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.00ms
07/11 17:02:38.613  超时   #6 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:38.888         #7 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.00ms
07/11 17:02:39.113  超时   #8 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:39.386         #9 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.00ms
07/11 17:02:39.613  超时   #10 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:40.114  超时   #11 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:40.385         #12 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.00ms
07/11 17:02:40.614  超时   #13 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:40.884 PingMax #14 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=269ms TTL=51, ave=268.17ms
07/11 17:02:41.114  超时   #15 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:41.385 MaxAve. #16 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=269ms TTL=51, ave=268.29ms
07/11 17:02:41.613  超时   #17 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:41.883         #18 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.25ms
07/11 17:02:42.113  超时   #19 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:42.613  超时   #20 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:42.887         #21 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.22ms
07/11 17:02:43.113  超时   #22 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:43.384         #23 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.20ms
07/11 17:02:43.613  超时   #24 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:43.886         #25 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.18ms
07/11 17:02:44.113  超时   #26 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:44.388         #27 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=269ms TTL=51, ave=268.25ms
07/11 17:02:44.613  超时   #28 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:45.113  超时   #29 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:45.388         #30 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.23ms
07/11 17:02:45.613  超时   #31 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:45.885         #32 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.21ms
07/11 17:02:46.114  超时   #33 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:46.385         #34 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.20ms
07/11 17:02:46.613  超时   #35 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:46.889 PingMax #36 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=273ms TTL=51, ave=268.50ms
07/11 17:02:47.113  超时   #37 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:47.383         #38 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.47ms
07/11 17:02:47.613  超时   #39 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:47.883         #40 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.44ms
07/11 17:02:48.113  超时   #41 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:48.384         #42 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.42ms
07/11 17:02:48.613  超时   #43 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:48.885         #44 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=269ms TTL=51, ave=268.45ms
07/11 17:02:49.113  超时   #45 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:49.385         #46 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.43ms
07/11 17:02:49.613  超时   #47 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:49.884         #48 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.41ms
07/11 17:02:50.113  超时   #49 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:50.385         #50 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=269ms TTL=51, ave=268.43ms
07/11 17:02:50.613  超时   #51 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:50.883         #52 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.42ms
07/11 17:02:51.114  超时   #53 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:51.385         #54 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.40ms
07/11 17:02:51.613  超时   #55 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:51.885         #56 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=269ms TTL=51, ave=268.42ms
07/11 17:02:52.114  超时   #57 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:52.384         #58 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.41ms
07/11 17:02:52.613  超时   #59 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
07/11 17:02:52.884         #60 Reply 32 bytes from 92.223.52.23: time=268ms TTL=51, ave=268.39ms
07/11 17:02:52.885         === 60 有效发送,   28 接收,     53.33% 丢失, 268.39ms 平均值  ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间:  2018/07/11 17:02:36
经过时间:            000:00:15
结束时间:  2018/07/11 17:02:52
----------------
    60 总计发送  
    0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)                
----------------
    60 有效发送  
    28 有效接收      
    32 timed out (53.33% 丢失)

wasaabi #407 Posted 11 July 2018 - 05:21 PM

    This Dude Abides

  • Senior Moderator
  • 20781 battles
  • 6,281
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostE65P, on 11 July 2018 - 07:06 PM, said:

2018/07/11 17:02:36.906 
---- 本文件由 AtkkPing.exe 创建 -----
Ping from 192.168.137.1 to 92.223.52.23
==============================================================================
 

 

This is not useful.  You need to use the following command:

 

tracert wotasia2.login.wargaming.net

 

This will show the routing which is important.


The Dude abides.

 
Spoiler

 


Napalmer #408 Posted 11 July 2018 - 05:41 PM

    Objectionable Individual

  • Community Contributor
  • 40999 battles
  • 2,513
  • [CZARS] CZARS
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012

View Poststruth, on 11 July 2018 - 06:27 PM, said:

 

Who would you suggest I contact at Optus?

 

Anyone but the guy you tried before. :teethhappy:

3-Marked Tanks: Chaffee, T37, AMX 12T, Cromwell, Skoda T25, SU-100, WZ-131G FT, IS-3, T-54, T-10, T57 Heavy, IS-7

Signature 

The smell of Napalm...                           


JimmyJim #409 Posted 11 July 2018 - 05:56 PM

    Captain

  • Beta-Tester
  • 52622 battles
  • 1,439
  • [CZARS] CZARS
  • Member since:
    09-12-2012

View PostScrubba, on 11 July 2018 - 04:23 PM, said:

Tan, any chance of posting a list of the ISPs you're currently working with so people know whether to hassle WG support / their ISP? I'm one of the unlucky ones getting routed through Japan from Australia atm and enjoying 280-300 ping..

 

How can you notice the difference when you only play WoT in drunk mode? LOL

CHAKA24 #410 Posted 11 July 2018 - 06:26 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 9700 battles
  • 2,168
  • [KMMHS] KMMHS
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012
Guys, is this Temporary or Permament server to HK connection in Asia Region?

crazib #411 Posted 11 July 2018 - 06:27 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 53347 battles
  • 1,848
  • [CROWN] CROWN
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

View PostScrubba, on 11 July 2018 - 04:23 PM, said:

Tan, any chance of posting a list of the ISPs you're currently working with so people know whether to hassle WG support / their ISP? I'm one of the unlucky ones getting routed through Japan from Australia atm and enjoying 280-300 ping..

 

and do you think he is drunk now?

Come visit my stream: twitch.tv/crazib

my replays thread


LeSigh #412 Posted 11 July 2018 - 06:39 PM

    It's Incredibly Disappointing

  • Member
  • 38952 battles
  • 4,084
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013
There is a very good chance crazib, a very good chance.

Scrubba #413 Posted 11 July 2018 - 06:40 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 29916 battles
  • 167
  • Member since:
    08-06-2013

View PostLeSigh, on 11 July 2018 - 08:09 PM, said:

There is a very good chance crazib, a very good chance.

 

Nah not yet lol


Alastor_N #414 Posted 11 July 2018 - 07:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • In-Training Moderator
  • 10279 battles
  • 108
  • [HKUE] HKUE
  • Member since:
    08-13-2015

View PostAoyama_Blue_Mountain, on 11 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

 

Well WG seems to be rather selective of who to leak to.

 

Well, it's not a leak from WG at all, it is just some random news on another forum, and there have been discussions about this. 

Make no mistake, I did not get the info from WG, and I would not say that WG is selective on leaking information.


Hate the game, not the player


Alastor_N #415 Posted 11 July 2018 - 07:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • In-Training Moderator
  • 10279 battles
  • 108
  • [HKUE] HKUE
  • Member since:
    08-13-2015

View PostCHAKA24, on 11 July 2018 - 06:26 PM, said:

Guys, is this Temporary or Permament server to HK connection in Asia Region?

 

It should be a permanent move of the game server from SG to HK.

Hate the game, not the player


samibsal #416 Posted 11 July 2018 - 07:45 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 1883 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    07-06-2017
if hk server was there then why did you switched off SG server.you could have just turn on the HK server and by this you could have 3 asian servers.and there would'nt be any complains about ping and routing.

Edited by samibsal, 11 July 2018 - 07:46 PM.


struth #417 Posted 11 July 2018 - 07:46 PM

    Crikey

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 43073 battles
  • 1,983
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    10-17-2013

View PostScrubba, on 11 July 2018 - 06:31 PM, said:

 

That original guy you spoke to at Optus seemed pretty good, surprised he didnt get it sorted for you :teethhappy:

 

View PostNapalmer, on 11 July 2018 - 07:41 PM, said:

 

Anyone but the guy you tried before. :teethhappy:

 

See that is not helpful at all.

TE_maaw_ #418 Posted 11 July 2018 - 07:50 PM

    Major

  • Live Streamer
  • 42780 battles
  • 2,163
  • [DPS] DPS
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012

View Postsamibsal, on 11 July 2018 - 07:45 PM, said:

if hk server was there then why did you switched off SG server.you could have just turn on the HK server and by this you could have 3 asian servers.and there would'nt be any complains about ping and routing.

 

and then u'll have complains about long que time

Mother_Of_All_Rommel #419 Posted 11 July 2018 - 07:53 PM

    Destroyer of WoT

  • Member
  • 20192 battles
  • 2,605
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostAlastor_N, on 11 July 2018 - 07:05 PM, said:

 

Well, it's not a leak from WG at all, it is just some random news on another forum, and there have been discussions about this. 

Make no mistake, I did not get the info from WG, and I would not say that WG is selective on leaking information.

WG stavka must be searching for that snitch now. Come to think about it, this whole changes fit operation kursk maskirovka move to hit german nazi back then... or that operation bagration? 


Anyone know how to put meme on sig, plss PM me, tq.


Tanitha #420 Posted 11 July 2018 - 09:14 PM

    WOT Producer

  • Administrator
  • 4422 battles
  • 7,913
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    02-16-2012

View PostScrubba, on 11 July 2018 - 04:23 PM, said:

Tan, any chance of posting a list of the ISPs you're currently working with so people know whether to hassle WG support / their ISP? I'm one of the unlucky ones getting routed through Japan from Australia atm and enjoying 280-300 ping..

 

Um not really..
Its being done by global connectivity experts.. not WG staff.

And they are doing everything..

But tracert's help.
So feel free to provide if you wish.

 

Regards
Tan

 


 

Feel free to like my Wargaming Facebook Page WGTanitha

 

 





2 user(s) are reading this topic

2 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


    iguru, Sir_Direkin