Jump to content


Ranked Battles Season 2 Feedback


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

YOLO_____ #21 Posted 18 August 2018 - 11:02 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Live Streamer
  • 38861 battles
  • 995
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013
Any chance of making the next season 7v7? Quicker queues (especially on anz) and alot more skill based and less relying on bots. There's a reason pro leagues are 7v7. Even if it was just for the APAC region because of population

 

Twitch | YouTube | Q&A

 

MoE |


Angmar_ #22 Posted 18 August 2018 - 12:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 20618 battles
  • 83
  • Member since:
    12-28-2014
I'd probably be interested in playing ranked if it was 7v7 as it'd actually be something different.

Napalmer #23 Posted 18 August 2018 - 01:57 PM

    Objectionable Individual

  • Community Contributor
  • 52546 battles
  • 2,868
  • [LEM0N] LEM0N
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012
7v7 would be a nice change from the very campy meta of Ranked at the moment.

3-Marked Tanks: Chaffee, Pz. T25, KV-220-2, KV-1, T-34S, Chi-Nu-Kai, Hellcat, T37, T78, WZ-131G FT, AMX 12T, Cromwell, Skoda T25, SU-100, King Tiger ©, T71 DA, IS-3, Super Pershing, T-54, E 50, T-10, T57 Heavy, Object 140, IS-7, E100, Maus, Centurion Action X, Badger, Super Conqueror, AMX 50B, STB-1, Strv 103B

Twitch.tv/TheNapalmer

Interested in ANZ Frontlines? Join the discord HERE and join the nightly games!


Ezz #24 Posted 18 August 2018 - 02:06 PM

    How many flipping posts do I need to get past Major?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 76108 battles
  • 36,986
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
You'd guess that with more open maps the meta might change too.

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, Balance TM and the Cartoon Connection

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


tidyO #25 Posted 18 August 2018 - 03:33 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta-Tester
  • 53264 battles
  • 47
  • [SABRE] SABRE
  • Member since:
    09-19-2012

View PostValheru_, on 18 August 2018 - 01:02 PM, said:

Any chance of making the next season 7v7? Quicker queues (especially on anz) and alot more skill based and less relying on bots. There's a reason pro leagues are 7v7. Even if it was just for the APAC region because of population

 

that is a good idea! please do this
 
 
for disappointment https://tanks.gg/asia/tidyO
 
 

DanLBob #26 Posted 18 August 2018 - 07:09 PM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 27809 battles
  • 3,221
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

7 v 7 works well with skilled players in competitions etc but with the general rabble how will you avoid the opposites sides lemming trains/cap rush scenario? Split the difference maybe and go with 10 v 10 or 12 v 12 so we get some differentiation between various modes but still have enough vehicles for trip wires. Also What are you going to do with arty in a more open setting. Yes they are already restricted to 2 per side in Ranked battles but with smaller teams and more open play even two would be too many. Unfortunately that in itself is probably enough for WG to not make the teams smaller.

 

Dan



DanLBob #27 Posted 19 August 2018 - 10:14 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 27809 battles
  • 3,221
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

View PostValheru_, on 18 August 2018 - 11:02 AM, said:

Any chance of making the next season 7v7? Quicker queues (especially on anz) and alot more skill based and less relying on bots. There's a reason pro leagues are 7v7. Even if it was just for the APAC region because of population

 

Could it be because most/all the players are Pro?

 

Dan



FramFramson #28 Posted 20 August 2018 - 02:37 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 51346 battles
  • 3,706
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    02-22-2015

As I mentioned in another thread, the rank you have to reach to get any end-of-season rewards makes this mode hopeless for greater than 50% of players. Given that it is more expensive and time-consuming to play versus other forms of TX and you only receive the tepid rewards once up on reaching each rank for the first time, this mode is simply not worth it for most people, let alone the timeout issues.

 

All I want is for bonds to be issued in Ranked battles on the same basis that they are in regular TX battles  - everyone on the winning team gets a few - so that I'm not being actively PENALIZED for playing ranked, and to incentivize actually playing for the win.


LT-playing masochist. It's too much fun to be a mosquito.


_Maui #29 Posted 20 August 2018 - 06:28 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 28588 battles
  • 553
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2015

For the ANZ server it would have to be 1 v 1, would not even get a game at 7 v 7.

Also would be better if run when clan wars was not on, the player base is not large enough to support more then one mode of play at any time (not including pubbie).


Edited by Thadeous, 20 August 2018 - 06:29 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users