Jump to content


10 Seconds Maximum Under Water?

underwater maximum duration

  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

LetsCamp_1 #1 Posted 09 October 2018 - 06:29 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 33943 battles
  • 81
  • [KTKID] KTKID
  • Member since:
    04-01-2017
For open topped tanks like Object 261, it's logical to last only 10 seconds underwater, maximum, but, for regular, enclosed tanks like cromwell, it's more realistic to give them like... 30 or 40 seconds underwater right? and increase the camo rating by like... 400% while submerging. I believe that will improve the general gameplay dynamics. What do you think?
1 clean hit to an enemy tank is enough to make my day in battle.

Zynth #2 Posted 09 October 2018 - 06:37 PM

    Aufklärungspanzer Panther

  • Member
  • 25820 battles
  • 2,974
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-01-2013
No.

 

RIP Aufklärungspanzer Panther 16th July 2015. You will be missed, friend.

But not for long. For "Heroes never die."

This account is proudly sponsored by Wargaming.


Ezz #3 Posted 09 October 2018 - 06:44 PM

    How many flipping posts do I need to get past Major?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 68077 battles
  • 36,084
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
Bazza always was ahead of his time. 

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

Currently moderating your English speaking community : AALGMadibaCenturion_NZ, Elite911, Moonbase Patrol Copter 7

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


pokeranger24 #4 Posted 09 October 2018 - 07:20 PM

    Dark Meister of Tanks

  • Member
  • 10309 battles
  • 998
  • [SPIDA] SPIDA
  • Member since:
    11-04-2016

View PostLetsCamp_1, on 09 October 2018 - 06:29 PM, said:

enclosed tanks like cromwell

 

Just becasue they are enclosed doesn't mean that they are water proof, Tanks like Cromwell were riveted so it had questionable waterproofing and Tanks with oscillating turrent had problems with leakage making them impossible to have NBC protection

 

Well there is also the problem of engine stalling underwater


The Great Overlords of Wargaming have bestowed me with the Title of Dark Meister of Tanks, The controller of RNG and MM

 

Thou must shout my name if you want favorable RNG and MM


Aoyama_Blue_Mountain #5 Posted 09 October 2018 - 07:24 PM

    Blue Mountain Aoyama

  • Beta-Tester
  • 74870 battles
  • 7,475
  • [DADDY] DADDY
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

Erm

 

How long would you try to drive your car underwater?


Noobs don't snipe because they are good at snipe; noobs snipe because they can't do anything else / People don't lose because they lemming; people lemming because they are losers

Do not confuse team strength with individual strength; a single enemy killed in a 1v3 is worth more than two enemies killed in a 4v2 / Lanchester's Square Law predicts in a 2v1, the side with 2 will end with 1.5 tanks remaining, so if you won with less than that remaining, you're actually noob, not pro

When you are not losing because you outnumber the enemy, your other flank is losing because they are outnumbered; it's just math

Law of mirror: When you are holding a 1v6 against the enemy, you own team is also getting 6v1 held by the enemy

Noob self-balancing theory: When you release a good tank, enough noobs will flood to play it, until the server stats become average again


Hype_ #6 Posted 09 October 2018 - 09:14 PM

    I mean, it could be worse

  • Member
  • 8677 battles
  • 1,074
  • [EYRIE] EYRIE
  • Member since:
    09-21-2013
Surely this is a whoosh to all replies

 


ZULUL_Warrior #7 Posted 09 October 2018 - 09:30 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 58589 battles
  • 1,928
  • [YETI] YETI
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012
then introduce diving equipment for tanks? sounds great

Come visit my stream: twitch.tv/crazib

my replays thread


Sir_Direkin #8 Posted 09 October 2018 - 09:39 PM

    Purveyor of Salt

  • Member
  • 12127 battles
  • 1,316
  • [VERTX] VERTX
  • Member since:
    12-16-2016
I'm all for increasing the submerged time for arty only. No increase in camo though.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumyqpRUeOPCy1RcKXl96VA

2nd MoE: A15 Crusader, AMX 12t, KV-85, M6 Heavy, M10 Wolverine, M24 Chaffee, SU-85, T-34, T-50, T1 Heavy, VK 16.02 Leopard


MadHouse10101 #9 Posted 09 October 2018 - 09:47 PM

    Legit T-22 btw

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 21568 battles
  • 886
  • [YETI] YETI
  • Member since:
    01-08-2014

          

                       

                                                                                                                                                                                    


MessyMix #10 Posted 10 October 2018 - 12:14 AM

    Guardian of Expired Meta

  • Beta-Tester
  • 7767 battles
  • 1,822
  • Member since:
    08-22-2012

View PostSir_Direkin, on 09 October 2018 - 09:39 PM, said:

I'm all for increasing the submerged time for arty only. No increase in camo though.

 

So those s-bags can shoot me from the sky and the water? No thanks. /s


ohai

Mother_Of_All_Rommel #11 Posted 10 October 2018 - 12:23 AM

    Ambassador of silly strat

  • Member
  • 21248 battles
  • 2,774
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostMessyMix, on 10 October 2018 - 12:14 AM, said:

 

So those s-bags can shoot me from the sky and the water? No thanks. /s

Im so gonna do this now :D


1940- In 2018, we will have flying cars.

2018- Tonk=lyfe, proven by scientist


_KayGeraint_ #12 Posted 10 October 2018 - 02:42 AM

    Rushes mid every game :^)

  • Member
  • 61919 battles
  • 4,753
  • [N_P_C] N_P_C
  • Member since:
    12-20-2012
i wonder if implementing this would prevent players from drowning by accident.. Possibly.

Obj 260 Get! 298/300 done with honors!  75/75 obj 260 missions done,73 with honours! :^)

3 mark: 1390 leo pta is-7 e5 t26a 2 mark: m46,obj 907, 50100, e100, batchat 25t,  t57 heavy, grille 15, obj 140, is-6, is-3, vkd, pzivh, mutz, spic, CAX, 113

Helljumper, Helljumper, where you been? Feet first into hell and back again! When I die please bury me deep! Place an MA5 down by my feet! Don't cry for me, don't shed no tear!
Just pack my box with PT gear! Cuz one early morning 'bout zero-five! The ground will rumble, there'll be lightning in the sky!
Don't you worry, don't come undone! It's just my ghost on a PT run!

http://cdn-frm-sg.wa...-1407289026.gif


FramFramson #13 Posted 10 October 2018 - 03:44 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 43461 battles
  • 3,546
  • [AVAST] AVAST
  • Member since:
    02-22-2015

View PostHype_, on 09 October 2018 - 08:14 AM, said:

Surely this is a whoosh to all replies

 

^

LT-playing masochist. It's too much fun to be a mosquito.


AKASHA178 #14 Posted 10 October 2018 - 05:19 AM

    Smurfette

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 36730 battles
  • 5,626
  • [-ONE-] -ONE-
  • Member since:
    10-22-2012

View PostLetsCamp_1, on 09 October 2018 - 06:29 PM, said:

For open topped tanks like Object 261, it's logical to last only 10 seconds underwater, maximum, but, for regular, enclosed tanks like cromwell, it's more realistic to give them like... 30 or 40 seconds underwater right? and increase the camo rating by like... 400% while submerging. I believe that will improve the general gameplay dynamics. What do you think?

 

its not a submarine game its tank game :teethhappy:

In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him.

more than 400 new vehicles are still planned for World of Tanks

 

 


Ezz #15 Posted 10 October 2018 - 06:06 AM

    How many flipping posts do I need to get past Major?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 68077 battles
  • 36,084
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
To add to the realism they'd need to double the repair bill for drowners as everything would need to be dried out as well. 

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

Currently moderating your English speaking community : AALGMadibaCenturion_NZ, Elite911, Moonbase Patrol Copter 7

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


Puggsley #16 Posted 10 October 2018 - 07:50 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 68014 battles
  • 1,669
  • [-1AR-] -1AR-
  • Member since:
    04-03-2014

And they would have to add some fish.

 

Like the pumpkins and bee hives.



NameWasStolenStresslevel #17 Posted 10 October 2018 - 09:25 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 40935 battles
  • 1,074
  • Member since:
    01-19-2015

View PostLetsCamp_1, on 09 October 2018 - 07:29 PM, said:

For open topped tanks like Object 261, it's logical to last only 10 seconds underwater, maximum, but, for regular, enclosed tanks like cromwell, it's more realistic to give them like... 30 or 40 seconds underwater right? and increase the camo rating by like... 400% while submerging. I believe that will improve the general gameplay dynamics. What do you think?

 

u mean that FV304 or somethng like that will get even more overpowered? or tanks like 55 58 or somrthing like that auto loader shitG will be able to remain invisble? plz remove spg from that suggestion and i would be okay except about that 400% camo rating bonus fake news. A tank under water makes bubbles go up and this is not world of warships to begin with. Too much fake news for my ears.

 

but your username fits well this suggestion.


Edited by NameWasStolenStresslevel, 10 October 2018 - 09:26 AM.

Having META problems?

 #Hashtag break the META

     (HAHAGHa i must have drank somethin)

             https://worldoftanks.asia/en/hall-of-fame/vehicles/A100_T49/#wot&w_ts=overall&w_nb=500

         Currently Hall of Fame T49's number 1 in WTR!!! (parameters are *battles +500* and *since 2014's* ranking)


Chappells #18 Posted 10 October 2018 - 10:32 AM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 82620 battles
  • 114
  • [-RGB-] -RGB-
  • Member since:
    08-14-2013

View PostSir_Direkin, on 09 October 2018 - 11:39 PM, said:

I'm all for increasing the submerged time for arty only. No increase in camo though.

 

 

Arty cannot shoot under water, intent of this post (If I understand correctly) is give you more time to kill Arty if they are trying to suicide.



Ezz #19 Posted 10 October 2018 - 10:37 AM

    How many flipping posts do I need to get past Major?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 68077 battles
  • 36,084
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012

View PostChappells, on 10 October 2018 - 12:32 PM, said:

 

 

Arty cannot shoot under water, intent of this post (If I understand correctly) is give you more time to kill Arty if they are trying to suicide.

Except for the camo bit. This dude might actually be posting this seriously. 


Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

Currently moderating your English speaking community : AALGMadibaCenturion_NZ, Elite911, Moonbase Patrol Copter 7

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


FramFramson #20 Posted 10 October 2018 - 11:14 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 43461 battles
  • 3,546
  • [AVAST] AVAST
  • Member since:
    02-22-2015

View PostChappells, on 09 October 2018 - 09:32 PM, said:

 

 

Arty cannot shoot under water, intent of this post (If I understand correctly) is give you more time to kill Arty if they are trying to suicide.

 

Most arty are open-topped tho.

 

Also, it's amazing how many players still don't realize you can't fire your gun when drowning. Force-drowning other tanks is just 100% pure

 


LT-playing masochist. It's too much fun to be a mosquito.






Also tagged with underwater, maximum, duration

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users