Ezz, on 16 September 2019 - 05:45 PM, said:
In all honesty most of us are rather amused. We haven't had a fresh SBMM nutter in a while.
15 posts to
Edited by STEALTHandGUILE, 16 September 2019 - 04:40 PM.
STEALTHandGUILE, on 16 September 2019 - 06:37 PM, said:
Just hang in there, I'll get to it shortly.
STEALTHandGUILE, on 16 September 2019 - 05:11 PM, said:
so far quite aware but not sure how it has been received.
it certainly hasn't been received as the definitive example of how WN8 predicts winning. Because it clearly shows bugger all correlation.
If you can where is the error and convince us that WN8 is a good measure? Come on tell us all and amaze us. Or amaze us with your backflips and backdowns. Or lies if you like. Typical tin foil hatter who can never support their point.
Its always hard being misunderstood!
Edited by Puggsley, 16 September 2019 - 05:33 PM.
Puggsley, on 16 September 2019 - 03:03 PM, said:
it certainly hasn't been received as the definitive example of how WN8 predicts winning. Because it clearly shows bugger all correlation.
If you can where is the error and convince us that WN8 is a good measure? Come on tell us all and amaze us. Or amaze us with your backflips and backdowns. Or lies if you like. Typical tin foil hatter who can never support their point.
Its always hard being misunderstood!
winning to me ,means having a rate of 55% and above win rate and anything over 1800 is a good WN8. Bugger all correlation cannot be explained so I will refrain from doing so."typical tin foil hatter " ooooh Muggsy using fancy terminology. Forget the terminology ,Muggsy and you probably wouldn't have to post about "Its always hard being misunderstood!" . By the way who is "us" , I noticed the same "us" in other posts, is it the muggsy trio or are there more of you lurking in the woodwork.
Edited by STEALTHandGUILE, 16 September 2019 - 11:01 PM.
Edited by STEALTHandGUILE, 17 September 2019 - 11:20 AM.
STEALTHandGUILE, on 17 September 2019 - 01:34 AM, said:
45% are quite rare actually. The most commom folks in the server are the 44%, 46% and 48%, maybe odd numbers are rarer than even numbers of wr percentile?? All i know is that your math doesnt add much to your own point.
Having META problems?
#Hashtag break the META
(HAHAGHa i must have drank somethin)
https://worldoftanks.asia/en/hall-of-fame/vehicles/A100_T49/#wot&w_ts=overall&w_nb=500
Currently Hall of Fame T49's number 1 in WTR!!! (parameters are *battles +500* and *since 2014's* ranking)
Having META problems?
#Hashtag break the META
(HAHAGHa i must have drank somethin)
https://worldoftanks.asia/en/hall-of-fame/vehicles/A100_T49/#wot&w_ts=overall&w_nb=500
Currently Hall of Fame T49's number 1 in WTR!!! (parameters are *battles +500* and *since 2014's* ranking)
Having META problems?
#Hashtag break the META
(HAHAGHa i must have drank somethin)
https://worldoftanks.asia/en/hall-of-fame/vehicles/A100_T49/#wot&w_ts=overall&w_nb=500
Currently Hall of Fame T49's number 1 in WTR!!! (parameters are *battles +500* and *since 2014's* ranking)
NameWasStolenStresslevel, on 16 September 2019 - 10:56 PM, said:
Why ?, the site has everything in 311 pages , serial number ,name of player, battles played, win rate , WN8, average damage, max kills ,max damage,etc. It can be arranged in any order and as per our criteria. you just have to then go to the relevant page to see ,for example ,number of players in 45% win rate. Suggest you go to the site, better than my explaining.
Edited by STEALTHandGUILE, 17 September 2019 - 02:29 AM.
Edited by STEALTHandGUILE, 17 September 2019 - 02:49 AM.
STEALTHandGUILE, on 16 September 2019 - 05:56 PM, said:
Why ?, the site has everything in 311 pages , serial number ,name of player, battles played, win rate , WN8, average damage, max kills ,max damage,etc. It can be arranged in any order and as per our criteria. you just have to then go to the relevant page to see ,for example ,number of players in 45% win rate. Suggest you go to the site, better than my explaining.
Stealth I believe your ability to detect sarcasm = zero.
BorisTheBlade888, on 17 September 2019 - 02:48 AM, said:
Stealth I believe your ability to detect sarcasm = zero.
"thanks" and as I said earlier " when I am sarcastic you will know it". subtility can be misunderstood and generally is, so I say dont bother.
Edited by STEALTHandGUILE, 17 September 2019 - 09:57 AM.
NameWasStolenStresslevel, on 17 September 2019 - 03:31 AM, said:
I've always said there are 3 kinds of people in this world - those that can count and those that can't.
STEALTHandGUILE, on 16 September 2019 - 08:54 PM, said:
winning to me ,means having a rate of 55% and above win rate and anything over 1800 is a good WN8. Bugger all correlation cannot be explained so I will refrain from doing so."typical tin foil hatter " ooooh Muggsy using fancy terminology. Forget the terminology ,Muggsy and you probably wouldn't have to post about "Its always hard being misunderstood!" . By the way who is "us" , I noticed the same "us" in other posts, is it the muggsy trio or are there more of you lurking in the woodwork.
So you have backflipped again?
Calling people names is the best you have eh?
Edited by Puggsley, 17 September 2019 - 10:02 AM.
Stealth - you realize you don't have to behave in the manner indicated by your clan name right?
Edited by BorisTheBlade888, 17 September 2019 - 10:27 AM.
Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "
>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, Balance TM and the Cartoon Connection
R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users