Jump to content


larger the caliber faster the reload, what?


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

killedbynoob #1 Posted 18 May 2019 - 01:10 AM

    Official Noob

  • Member
  • 21416 battles
  • 196
  • [JOHOR] JOHOR
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012

reload on stock

T-103

130mm 10.74 seconds reload

 

Rhm. Skorpion

128mm 12.2 seconds reload

 

Kanonenjadgpanzer 105

105mm 11.51 seconds reload

 

SU-130PM

130mm 13.04 seconds reload

 

logic?


(●_●---------)<

I'm just a fish

What u expect?


Napalmer #2 Posted 18 May 2019 - 01:54 AM

    Objectionable Individual

  • Community Contributor
  • 47393 battles
  • 2,681
  • [YETI] YETI
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012
It also does 440 alpha, which is less than a 128mm, assuming you're talking about the T-103

3-Marked Tanks: Chaffee, Pz. T25 T37, Hellcat, WZ-131G FT, AMX 12T, Cromwell, Skoda T25, SU-100, WZ-131G FT, IS-3, T-54, T-10, T57 Heavy, Object 140, IS-7, E100, Maus, Centurion Action X, Super Conqueror,

AMX 50BSTB-1

Signature 

The smell of Napalm...                           


killedbynoob #3 Posted 18 May 2019 - 01:59 AM

    Official Noob

  • Member
  • 21416 battles
  • 196
  • [JOHOR] JOHOR
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012

View PostNapalmer, on 18 May 2019 - 01:54 AM, said:

It also does 440 alpha, which is less than a 128mm, assuming you're talking about the T-103

 

yea but no fair the 105mm load slower than 130mm, it's like 25mm different

(●_●---------)<

I'm just a fish

What u expect?


mttspiii #4 Posted 18 May 2019 - 05:05 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 31416 battles
  • 17,004
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View Postkilledbynoob, on 18 May 2019 - 01:59 AM, said:

 

yea but no fair the 105mm load slower than 130mm, it's like 25mm different

 

Kjp is cramped unlike T-103 or SU-130PM

I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 

 


BorisTheBlade888 #5 Posted 18 May 2019 - 07:09 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 35194 battles
  • 573
  • [BLAZE] BLAZE
  • Member since:
    04-15-2013

View Postkilledbynoob, on 17 May 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

reload on stock

T-103

130mm 10.74 seconds reload

 

Rhm. Skorpion

128mm 12.2 seconds reload

 

Kanonenjadgpanzer 105

105mm 11.51 seconds reload

 

SU-130PM

130mm 13.04 seconds reload

 

logic?

 

After having played 20000+ battles in this game I would have assumed that you knew there is nothing about it based on logic? If you are looking for a simulator go elsewhere - otherwise please realise decisions in this game are made by Wargaming based on keeping the $$$ coming in to keep SerB in his moonbase. Look at the size of an E25 - and how cramped it would be for the crew. Tell me how the loader in my E25 is able to constantly reload a 75MM shell in 2.3 secs? 

Edited by BorisTheBlade888, 18 May 2019 - 07:11 AM.


mttspiii #6 Posted 18 May 2019 - 07:35 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 31416 battles
  • 17,004
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View PostBorisTheBlade888, on 18 May 2019 - 07:09 AM, said:

 

After having played 20000+ battles in this game I would have assumed that you knew there is nothing about it based on logic? If you are looking for a simulator go elsewhere - otherwise please realise decisions in this game are made by Wargaming based on keeping the $$$ coming in to keep SerB in his moonbase. Look at the size of an E25 - and how cramped it would be for the crew. Tell me how the loader in my E25 is able to constantly reload a 75MM shell in 2.3 secs? 

 

Had it not been a premium tank WG would've made it the correct size, the way they did with the FV304.

 

And the playerbase will whinge for it.


I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 

 


MagicalFlyingFox #7 Posted 18 May 2019 - 08:11 AM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 32231 battles
  • 13,552
  • [YETI] YETI
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012
What was it that Serb used to say?

Wan't realism? Join the army. 

http://www.theuselessweb.com/

 A. Guy on 02 June 2018 - 12:40 AM, said:

Destroyer of Tier 6 CW... says it all about you.


TheBudgiesmuggler #8 Posted 18 May 2019 - 08:56 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Member
  • 28358 battles
  • 315
  • [PXR] PXR
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostBorisTheBlade888, on 18 May 2019 - 09:09 AM, said:

 

After having played 20000+ battles in this game I would have assumed that you knew there is nothing about it based on logic? If you are looking for a simulator go elsewhere - otherwise please realise decisions in this game are made by Wargaming based on keeping the $$$ coming in to keep SerB in his moonbase. Look at the size of an E25 - and how cramped it would be for the crew. Tell me how the loader in my E25 is able to constantly reload a 75MM shell in 2.3 secs? 

 

Because Peter Dinklage is the loader...lol

chook_on_a_stick #9 Posted 18 May 2019 - 01:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 12373 battles
  • 33
  • [SABRE] SABRE
  • Member since:
    08-11-2018

View Postkilledbynoob, on 18 May 2019 - 02:40 AM, said:

reload on stock

T-103

130mm 10.74 seconds reload

 

Rhm. Skorpion

128mm 12.2 seconds reload

 

Kanonenjadgpanzer 105

105mm 11.51 seconds reload

 

SU-130PM

130mm 13.04 seconds reload

 

logic?

 

presumably there is a rough standard for DPM for each class of vehicle at each tier that WG roughly adheres to to keep things somewhat balanced.

 

So I suspect reload speed is adjusted to keep the DPM in the range WG wants.

 

If you’re looking for a real life/historical justification on these largely imaginary vehicles, you can go down the ergonomics and equipment justification.

 



anonym_dFJfwi30yvzd #10 Posted 18 May 2019 - 01:29 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 2,625
  • Member since:
    08-20-2019
155mm is about 50kg irl. [edited] hell my arms still hurt.

killedbynoob #11 Posted 18 May 2019 - 03:39 PM

    Official Noob

  • Member
  • 21416 battles
  • 196
  • [JOHOR] JOHOR
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012

View Postmttspiii, on 18 May 2019 - 05:05 AM, said:

 

Kjp is cramped unlike T-103 or SU-130PM

 

yea then how about skorp being open top?

(●_●---------)<

I'm just a fish

What u expect?


killedbynoob #12 Posted 18 May 2019 - 03:40 PM

    Official Noob

  • Member
  • 21416 battles
  • 196
  • [JOHOR] JOHOR
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012

View Postchook_on_a_stick, on 18 May 2019 - 01:05 PM, said:

 

presumably there is a rough standard for DPM for each class of vehicle at each tier that WG roughly adheres to to keep things somewhat balanced.

 

So I suspect reload speed is adjusted to keep the DPM in the range WG wants.

 

If you’re looking for a real life/historical justification on these largely imaginary vehicles, you can go down the ergonomics and equipment justification.

 

 

"balance"

(●_●---------)<

I'm just a fish

What u expect?


mttspiii #13 Posted 19 May 2019 - 02:45 AM

    Major

  • Beta-Tester
  • 31416 battles
  • 17,004
  • [CALM] CALM
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View Postkilledbynoob, on 18 May 2019 - 03:39 PM, said:

 

yea then how about skorp being open top?

 

Turret ring size.


I'm fierce and I'm feeling mighty,

I'm a golden girl, I'm an Aphrodite

 

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users