Jump to content


Please Ban 279(e) in clan war match


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

HarIIest #1 Posted 26 October 2019 - 01:23 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 53321 battles
  • 30
  • [DTNVL] DTNVL
  • Member since:
    11-28-2013
Not fair , where justice
 


AKASHA178 #2 Posted 26 October 2019 - 03:50 AM

    Smurfette

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 44520 battles
  • 5,734
  • [ESLMN] ESLMN
  • Member since:
    10-22-2012

View PostHarIIest, on 25 October 2019 - 08:53 PM, said:

Not fair , where justice
 

the good players earned it, and they have all the rights to use it


In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him.

 

more than 400 new vehicles are still planned for World of Tanks


 

 


Aoyama_Blue_Mountain #3 Posted 26 October 2019 - 10:03 AM

    Blue Mountain Aoyama

  • Beta-Tester
  • 81910 battles
  • 7,793
  • [FIDDY] FIDDY
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostAKASHA178, on 26 October 2019 - 03:50 AM, said:

the good players earned it, and they have all the rights to use it

 

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAH


"oNlY tOxIc PlAyErS bLaMe ThE tEaM fOr LoSiNg"

 

Still waiting for techtree-based CW


HoPeY_ #4 Posted 26 October 2019 - 10:47 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 104491 battles
  • 3,793
  • [DETOX] DETOX
  • Member since:
    01-20-2013
Most seemed to have bought it or rigged battles to get it on the AU server early in the morning.

Napalmer #5 Posted 26 October 2019 - 10:53 AM

    Objectionable Individual

  • Community Contributor
  • 51768 battles
  • 2,862
  • [LEM0N] LEM0N
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012

Proud owner of a non-rigged 279 here.

 

It's honestly not that effective in CW on a lot of maps. Way too slow to get to the fight, and way too slow to rotate.

 

Sure, it might be difficult to deal with in lower level play, but most high-tier clans work around them pretty easily.


Edited by Napalmer, 26 October 2019 - 11:00 AM.

3-Marked Tanks: Chaffee, Pz. T25, KV-220-2, KV-1, T-34S, Chi-Nu-Kai, Hellcat, T37, T78, WZ-131G FT, AMX 12T, Cromwell, Skoda T25, SU-100, King Tiger ©, T71 DA, IS-3, Super Pershing, T-54, E 50, T-10, T57 Heavy, Object 140, IS-7, E100, Maus, Centurion Action X, Badger, Super Conqueror, AMX 50B, STB-1, Strv 103B

Twitch.tv/TheNapalmer

Interested in ANZ Frontlines? Join the discord HERE and join the nightly games!


Twit_ #6 Posted 26 October 2019 - 01:01 PM

    69 Recognized

  • Member
  • 19671 battles
  • 290
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    11-28-2017

View PostNapalmer, on 26 October 2019 - 10:53 AM, said:

Proud owner of a non-rigged 279 here.

 

It's honestly not that effective in CW on a lot of maps. Way too slow to get to the fight, and way too slow to rotate.

 

Sure, it might be difficult to deal with in lower level play, but most high-tier clans work around them pretty easily.

 

279 is the meta on a lot of maps and can replace a maus to hold a flank

 

Lakeville is spam 279

tundra is spam 279

himmels you can spam 279

ensk you can spam 279

fishermans bay you can spam 279 on the middle ridge

 

and it is effective in cw, it has better dpm than the chieftain and can't be countered when angled upwards :dribble:

 

I would prefer restricting the amount of reward tanks in cw or removing them from global map games, the meta is so depressing these days, literally spam chieftain 279 and 907

 


The mindset you need to improve

 

 

WHY DO THEY CALL IT OVEN WHEN YOU OF IN THE COLD FOOD OF OUT HOT EAT THE FOOD 


AKASHA178 #7 Posted 26 October 2019 - 03:39 PM

    Smurfette

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 44520 battles
  • 5,734
  • [ESLMN] ESLMN
  • Member since:
    10-22-2012

View PostAoyama_Blue_Mountain, on 26 October 2019 - 05:33 AM, said:

 

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAH

not those who paid others to grind it for them (some players owns it but when u platoon with them they play like 2k pr )


In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him.

 

more than 400 new vehicles are still planned for World of Tanks


 

 


Vindictus_Maximus #8 Posted 26 October 2019 - 03:50 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 9404 battles
  • 163
  • [BAMF] BAMF
  • Member since:
    12-16-2017

I saw a video where a tier 8 TS-5 worked over a 279e by just facehugging it and pounding into it's upper plate, while the 279e was forced to try to hit the TS-5s cupola. If I was playing clanwars, I would consider facehugging one with an IS7.

 

The gun depression of the IS7 would be an autopen, while having an a autobounce upper plate, maybe it could easily kill an 279e outright without getting a scratch. I would consider testing in a training room.

 

I remember killiing a full health Maus outright in a C/W battle with an IS7 by sidehugging it, it could not pen me, every tank has weakness and a counter.

 

 


Edited by Vindictus_Maximus, 26 October 2019 - 03:53 PM.


IMC_Jezza #9 Posted 26 October 2019 - 04:35 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 41858 battles
  • 680
  • [FIDDY] FIDDY
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013

View PostVindictus_Maximus, on 26 October 2019 - 05:20 PM, said:

I saw a video where a tier 8 TS-5 worked over a 279e by just facehugging it and pounding into it's upper plate, while the 279e was forced to try to hit the TS-5s cupola. If I was playing clanwars, I would consider facehugging one with an IS7.

 

The gun depression of the IS7 would be an autopen, while having an a autobounce upper plate, maybe it could easily kill an 279e outright without getting a scratch. I would consider testing in a training room.

 

I remember killiing a full health Maus outright in a C/W battle with an IS7 by sidehugging it, it could not pen me, every tank has weakness and a counter.

 

 

 

 

Yeah but in CW's where there's 1, there's more..........


Snowflake?

Princess?

"Personally I use my anonymizer to hide my shame at being unable to kill every clan I join despite my best attempts."


Saffelicious #10 Posted 26 October 2019 - 08:38 PM

    Master flipper !

  • Live Streamer
  • 37884 battles
  • 3,720
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    12-18-2013

I approve of OPs post.

Stupid [edited] tank that should never have been in the game. 

Add all the riggers into the mix that definitely should not have had the tank and you have a classic WG clown fiesta on your hands. 


Edited by Saffelicious, 26 October 2019 - 08:39 PM.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
 
 
Pubbie 1
"You guys run around in t10 tanks with, prem consumables, prem rounds, prem crews and even prem modules and that is not fair on the newbies in t8, how do you expect the server to survive if this is what they get from your clan. Some of us want this server to survive."
Pubbie 2
"What's pathetic and un Australian is you and the other [edited] complaining about those here behind their backs on the other forum. What's pathetic is thinking you are better than others on forums and in the game and big noting yourself when blind Feddy can see your sudden improvement on purchasing vpack"

HarIIest #11 Posted 26 October 2019 - 10:16 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 53321 battles
  • 30
  • [DTNVL] DTNVL
  • Member since:
    11-28-2013
How about Wargaming can gift me one 279(e)  

CelestiaLudenberg #12 Posted 27 October 2019 - 06:32 AM

    On Conan's Naughty List

  • Member
  • 24436 battles
  • 1,072
  • [ATLUS] ATLUS
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016

What would be a better fix is if they undid the stupid buffs they gave it pre-release.

 

Buffing an already broken tank not once, but twice before it was even released because some morons on the RU server said it wasn't OP enough.

 

Then to make it worse, they changed its name from Obj. 726 (Real name) to 279 Early so they could attempt to justify changing its armour far past the actual design specs.


When you show her all 96kw from your mighty 20E


U12D13 #13 Posted 27 October 2019 - 11:15 AM

    IRL Garbage Collector

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 44603 battles
  • 2,038
  • [TRAPS] TRAPS
  • Member since:
    12-11-2013
Nah, CWs should not have reward tanks of any sort in its lineup to begin with.

So you can have an equal playing field (especially for first-time CW players). Make the cw about skill & tactics, and less of the exclusivity of the machine thats better than the tech tree counterpart in determining games.

It will completely solve the issue of meta-OP tanks that wont be balanced anytime soon such as 907/T95Chf/279e.

I'm not good at this game, its just that the rest of the server sucks~

Casual Gaming: Apply for [ANKOU] today! Simple requirements: English speaking, new players welcome!

Competitive Gaming: Come join in the [TRAPS] family! Weekly Advances and CWs~ Now recruiting!


Aoyama_Blue_Mountain #14 Posted 27 October 2019 - 11:44 AM

    Blue Mountain Aoyama

  • Beta-Tester
  • 81910 battles
  • 7,793
  • [FIDDY] FIDDY
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

CW is about skill & tactics?

 

I have stopped and will continue to stop taking CW seriously until they disable mods.


Edited by Aoyama_Blue_Mountain, 27 October 2019 - 11:44 AM.

"oNlY tOxIc PlAyErS bLaMe ThE tEaM fOr LoSiNg"

 

Still waiting for techtree-based CW


basil_liddell_hart #15 Posted 27 October 2019 - 12:18 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 40642 battles
  • 98
  • [LANCR] LANCR
  • Member since:
    03-31-2014

Whilst I would prefer to not see half a team of 279(e)'s  it doesn't worry me that much. 

 

What I was thinking was why not change tier of CW battles around a bit.  If the next round of Cw was tier 9 it would make it a bit different and perhaps more interesting whilst also giving tier 9 some justification. 



Napalmer #16 Posted 27 October 2019 - 01:42 PM

    Objectionable Individual

  • Community Contributor
  • 51768 battles
  • 2,862
  • [LEM0N] LEM0N
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012

View PostAoyama_Blue_Mountain, on 27 October 2019 - 01:44 PM, said:

CW is about skill & tactics?

 

I have stopped and will continue to stop taking CW seriously until they disable mods.

Hate to disappoint you, but you're about 7 years too late. Illegal mods aren't that common nowadays.

 

View Postbasil_liddell_hart, on 27 October 2019 - 02:18 PM, said:

Whilst I would prefer to not see half a team of 279(e)'s  it doesn't worry me that much. 

 

What I was thinking was why not change tier of CW battles around a bit.  If the next round of Cw was tier 9 it would make it a bit different and perhaps more interesting whilst also giving tier 9 some justification. 

The problem with this though is that we would need to rebuy a lot of different vehicles, and sort out crews. Most people don't keep tier 9s.


3-Marked Tanks: Chaffee, Pz. T25, KV-220-2, KV-1, T-34S, Chi-Nu-Kai, Hellcat, T37, T78, WZ-131G FT, AMX 12T, Cromwell, Skoda T25, SU-100, King Tiger ©, T71 DA, IS-3, Super Pershing, T-54, E 50, T-10, T57 Heavy, Object 140, IS-7, E100, Maus, Centurion Action X, Badger, Super Conqueror, AMX 50B, STB-1, Strv 103B

Twitch.tv/TheNapalmer

Interested in ANZ Frontlines? Join the discord HERE and join the nightly games!


Aoyama_Blue_Mountain #17 Posted 27 October 2019 - 01:50 PM

    Blue Mountain Aoyama

  • Beta-Tester
  • 81910 battles
  • 7,793
  • [FIDDY] FIDDY
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostNapalmer, on 27 October 2019 - 01:42 PM, said:

Hate to disappoint you, but you're about 7 years too late. Illegal mods aren't that common nowadays.

 

Luckily the guy has left and is in [FORT] now or I would have brought up his name.

 

Unless you are just saying this sarcastically since 7 years ago is 2012.

 

Anyway I'm having a laugh watching a video that was uploaded 3 years ago... you know, the one that happened when talking to enemy was still allowed.


Edited by Aoyama_Blue_Mountain, 27 October 2019 - 01:53 PM.

"oNlY tOxIc PlAyErS bLaMe ThE tEaM fOr LoSiNg"

 

Still waiting for techtree-based CW


basil_liddell_hart #18 Posted 27 October 2019 - 03:01 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 40642 battles
  • 98
  • [LANCR] LANCR
  • Member since:
    03-31-2014

View PostNapalmer, on 27 October 2019 - 05:42 AM, said:

The problem with this though is that we would need to rebuy a lot of different vehicles, and sort out crews. Most people don't keep tier 9s.

 

That's not such a huge problem though really.  Lets face it their isn't a huge variety of tier nines you would expect to see in a CW battle if it happened.  



LeSigh #19 Posted 27 October 2019 - 03:22 PM

    It's Incredibly Disappointing

  • Member
  • 55004 battles
  • 4,322
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013
I only have 34 to chose from. 
This account proudly sponsored by WG

AKASHA178 #20 Posted 27 October 2019 - 10:17 PM

    Smurfette

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 44520 battles
  • 5,734
  • [ESLMN] ESLMN
  • Member since:
    10-22-2012

View PostNapalmer, on 27 October 2019 - 09:12 AM, said:

The problem with this though is that we would need to rebuy a lot of different vehicles, and sort out crews. Most people don't keep tier 9s.

so keep them all like me, 302 tanks in garage :coin:


In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him.

 

more than 400 new vehicles are still planned for World of Tanks


 

 





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users