Jump to content


Rule Change.


  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

IMC_Jezza #41 Posted 16 February 2020 - 02:13 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 41858 battles
  • 680
  • [FIDDY] FIDDY
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013

30 day campaign, 5 days is say 1/6th of the time.... even 2 days for a 10 day campaign imho is still a warning/punishment enough.... it allows you to apply aggressively (for the good of the clan and the campaign) yet still pulls you back enough when you cop a slap.............

 

Have a look at PANDA - dunno what happened there, but they're sitting on 3 slaps for half of the campaign.... rip........ it's literally shredded their campaign experience......

 


Snowflake?

Princess?

"Personally I use my anonymizer to hide my shame at being unable to kill every clan I join despite my best attempts."


HoPeY_ #42 Posted 16 February 2020 - 02:27 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 104491 battles
  • 3,793
  • [DETOX] DETOX
  • Member since:
    01-20-2013
Because we didn't see the change to 9 players we nearly got a total ban (4 penalties) on the first day for 5 days. That would have been impressive.

IMC_Jezza #43 Posted 16 February 2020 - 03:02 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Member
  • 41858 battles
  • 680
  • [FIDDY] FIDDY
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013
Mega Ooooooof.......  that's the thing though - makes it damn hard for your campaign because of it........  for literally half of it..........  bit harsh imho.......

Snowflake?

Princess?

"Personally I use my anonymizer to hide my shame at being unable to kill every clan I join despite my best attempts."


RainbowAssassin #44 Posted 21 February 2020 - 03:03 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 40741 battles
  • 2,148
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostHoPeY_, on 14 February 2020 - 02:44 PM, said:

PANDA on 3 already... GG Campaign.

bro.... god damn

 

If you cant field 10 people, and the rules say 9 is minimum. You get penalized, read the rules next time. 


 
Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS-4, IS-7, T57 Heavy Tank, FV217 Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Object 140, Conqueror Gun Carriage, VK 72.01 (K), FV215b (183), Super Conqueror, Object 277, T-100 LT, Object 907, Jagdpanzer E 100, Bat.-châtillon 25 t, WZ 111 model 5A, FV215b, Centurion Action X, Object 430U, Type 5 Heavy, 60TP Lewandowskiego, T-62A, T110E4, E100, TVP T 50/51, OBJ. 260, T110E3, STB-1, FV4005 Stage II, T95/FV4201, M48A5 Patton, E 50 Ausf. M, 113, Strv 103B, Obj. 268 4, AMX 13 105, Panhard EBR 105, Foch 155

 


 

 


RainbowAssassin #45 Posted 21 February 2020 - 03:04 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 40741 battles
  • 2,148
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostHoPeY_, on 16 February 2020 - 05:27 PM, said:

Because we didn't see the change to 9 players we nearly got a total ban (4 penalties) on the first day for 5 days. That would have been impressive.

So what your saying is, if you had known it was 9, you would have put an extra player in?

 

It says in the SPECIAL BATTLE waiting room "Minimum of 9 players required" in 10v10. It literally says it every time you play the game. Read, rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

 

My clan has got many penalties, we also dont want to get them, but it happens. It messes us up too but it could happen to anyone, who knows your enemy could have more, but they aren't complaining. 

 

Although cringe does make good content, thanks I suppose

 


Edited by RainbowAssassin, 21 February 2020 - 03:10 PM.

 
Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS-4, IS-7, T57 Heavy Tank, FV217 Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Object 140, Conqueror Gun Carriage, VK 72.01 (K), FV215b (183), Super Conqueror, Object 277, T-100 LT, Object 907, Jagdpanzer E 100, Bat.-châtillon 25 t, WZ 111 model 5A, FV215b, Centurion Action X, Object 430U, Type 5 Heavy, 60TP Lewandowskiego, T-62A, T110E4, E100, TVP T 50/51, OBJ. 260, T110E3, STB-1, FV4005 Stage II, T95/FV4201, M48A5 Patton, E 50 Ausf. M, 113, Strv 103B, Obj. 268 4, AMX 13 105, Panhard EBR 105, Foch 155

 


 

 


HoPeY_ #46 Posted 21 February 2020 - 11:22 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 104491 battles
  • 3,793
  • [DETOX] DETOX
  • Member since:
    01-20-2013
Are you the type that reads instruction manuals when you get new stuff?

Ezz #47 Posted 22 February 2020 - 05:27 AM

    How many flipping posts do I need to get past Major?

  • Beta-Tester
  • 73775 battles
  • 36,880
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    07-17-2012
Suspect he's more the type that follows the on screen prompts on how to unlock his phone rather than chuck a wobbly because the unlock is slightly different to last year's phone.

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

R. Pubbie: "why are all PBKAC players so rude, arrogant and nasty? and why do Mods favor them?"


Saffelicious #48 Posted 22 February 2020 - 08:27 AM

    Master flipper !

  • Live Streamer
  • 37884 battles
  • 3,720
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    12-18-2013
The gift that keeps on giving.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
 
 
Pubbie 1
"You guys run around in t10 tanks with, prem consumables, prem rounds, prem crews and even prem modules and that is not fair on the newbies in t8, how do you expect the server to survive if this is what they get from your clan. Some of us want this server to survive."
Pubbie 2
"What's pathetic and un Australian is you and the other [edited] complaining about those here behind their backs on the other forum. What's pathetic is thinking you are better than others on forums and in the game and big noting yourself when blind Feddy can see your sudden improvement on purchasing vpack"

RainbowAssassin #49 Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:06 AM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 40741 battles
  • 2,148
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostHoPeY_, on 22 February 2020 - 02:22 AM, said:

Are you the type that reads instruction manuals when you get new stuff?

So your saying its not your fault because you didnt read the rules like everyone else. Yes others might not read the rules, I for one dont care as im just a soldier. Although you cant blame the game for making rules then enforcing them? 


 
Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS-4, IS-7, T57 Heavy Tank, FV217 Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Object 140, Conqueror Gun Carriage, VK 72.01 (K), FV215b (183), Super Conqueror, Object 277, T-100 LT, Object 907, Jagdpanzer E 100, Bat.-châtillon 25 t, WZ 111 model 5A, FV215b, Centurion Action X, Object 430U, Type 5 Heavy, 60TP Lewandowskiego, T-62A, T110E4, E100, TVP T 50/51, OBJ. 260, T110E3, STB-1, FV4005 Stage II, T95/FV4201, M48A5 Patton, E 50 Ausf. M, 113, Strv 103B, Obj. 268 4, AMX 13 105, Panhard EBR 105, Foch 155

 


 

 


RainbowAssassin #50 Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:10 AM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 40741 battles
  • 2,148
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013
[Removed] "test"

Edited by RainbowAssassin, 22 February 2020 - 11:31 AM.

 
Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS-4, IS-7, T57 Heavy Tank, FV217 Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Object 140, Conqueror Gun Carriage, VK 72.01 (K), FV215b (183), Super Conqueror, Object 277, T-100 LT, Object 907, Jagdpanzer E 100, Bat.-châtillon 25 t, WZ 111 model 5A, FV215b, Centurion Action X, Object 430U, Type 5 Heavy, 60TP Lewandowskiego, T-62A, T110E4, E100, TVP T 50/51, OBJ. 260, T110E3, STB-1, FV4005 Stage II, T95/FV4201, M48A5 Patton, E 50 Ausf. M, 113, Strv 103B, Obj. 268 4, AMX 13 105, Panhard EBR 105, Foch 155

 


 

 


HoPeY_ #51 Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:18 AM

    Major

  • Member
  • 104491 battles
  • 3,793
  • [DETOX] DETOX
  • Member since:
    01-20-2013

View PostRainbowAssassin, on 22 February 2020 - 11:06 AM, said:

So your saying its not your fault because you didnt read the rules like everyone else. Yes others might not read the rules, I for one dont care as im just a soldier. Although you cant blame the game for making rules then enforcing them? 

 

Sorry, I'm old and a 8 looks like a 9 to my eyes. Do I spend time reading the tiny text with my old eyes while waiting for a game or do I listen to my caller etc...

 

It's not as though I was alone with this, the rest of my guys also failed to notice the change.

 

Strange how you guys are so perfect :)

 

And thanks for the follow once again saff.. Who follows whom? LOL



RainbowAssassin #52 Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:23 AM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 40741 battles
  • 2,148
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostHoPeY_, on 22 February 2020 - 02:22 AM, said:

Are you the type that reads instruction manuals when you get new stuff?

As with all the stuff you and Jimmy talked about. Bias aside

 

Your tactic: Run risky, risking Technical defeats  for more games
Jimmy: Not running risky, playing it safe

 

Your result: Get technical defeat, despite admitting you are running it risky, 
 

 

Risk
/rɪsk/
noun
 
  1. a situation involving exposure to danger.
     
     

 

What do you know, the chance of "danger" happened and your complaining. Then you continue to say that your method is better, yet you are complaining about it at the same time, by running your strategy and "wrecked our whole campaign"

View PostHoPeY_, on 14 February 2020 - 11:57 AM, said:

A rule caught us out last night and nearly wrecked our whole campaign. 

 

 

Please understand not everything in your bubble of a world works out.. You took a risk, it didn't work. The same goes for everyone else who did the same. Once again my clan had the same issues, we took risks for more games, we got double technical defeats on the second day, meaning we could only chip half the amount of battles for 3 days, thats a massive game changer. We took the consequence and adapted, moved on. I personally didn't know it was 9 instead of 8, until I saw your thread. It doesn't matter though.

 

First, if you knew it was 9, would you have chipped less games? NO. If you knew it was 9, would you have magically got an extra player online? NO. Because if you could just get someone else on, you would have got them on to make that 8 into a 9, to increase your chances of winning anyway.

 

Not knowing it was 9, made NO DIFFERENCE at all to the game plan. You are effectively rioting against a rule that was made, with no backing to the reason it should not be there. If you actually wanna make your time worth while, maybe complain that 9 is too hard and Asia is small? That might be a worth while discussion. Instead your battering on with "facts" like you cant read when, knowing about the rule would not have changed your situation. 


Edited by RainbowAssassin, 22 February 2020 - 11:30 AM.

 
Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS-4, IS-7, T57 Heavy Tank, FV217 Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Object 140, Conqueror Gun Carriage, VK 72.01 (K), FV215b (183), Super Conqueror, Object 277, T-100 LT, Object 907, Jagdpanzer E 100, Bat.-châtillon 25 t, WZ 111 model 5A, FV215b, Centurion Action X, Object 430U, Type 5 Heavy, 60TP Lewandowskiego, T-62A, T110E4, E100, TVP T 50/51, OBJ. 260, T110E3, STB-1, FV4005 Stage II, T95/FV4201, M48A5 Patton, E 50 Ausf. M, 113, Strv 103B, Obj. 268 4, AMX 13 105, Panhard EBR 105, Foch 155

 


 

 


RainbowAssassin #53 Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:24 AM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 40741 battles
  • 2,148
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostHoPeY_, on 22 February 2020 - 02:18 PM, said:

 

Sorry, I'm old and a 8 looks like a 9 to my eyes. Do I spend time reading the tiny text with my old eyes while waiting for a game or do I listen to my caller etc...

 

It's not as though I was alone with this, the rest of my guys also failed to notice the change.

 

Strange how you guys are so perfect :)

 

And thanks for the follow once again saff.. Who follows whom? LOL

Sorry, Ill help make a petition to Wargaming, that you should not have got a technical defeat because you have difficulty reading. 

 

Even if you did read 8, would it have mattered? You still got a technical defeat. Play by the rules everyone else plays by or go somewhere else.


 
Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS-4, IS-7, T57 Heavy Tank, FV217 Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Object 140, Conqueror Gun Carriage, VK 72.01 (K), FV215b (183), Super Conqueror, Object 277, T-100 LT, Object 907, Jagdpanzer E 100, Bat.-châtillon 25 t, WZ 111 model 5A, FV215b, Centurion Action X, Object 430U, Type 5 Heavy, 60TP Lewandowskiego, T-62A, T110E4, E100, TVP T 50/51, OBJ. 260, T110E3, STB-1, FV4005 Stage II, T95/FV4201, M48A5 Patton, E 50 Ausf. M, 113, Strv 103B, Obj. 268 4, AMX 13 105, Panhard EBR 105, Foch 155

 


 

 


MagicalFlyingFox #54 Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:29 AM

    Destroyer of Tier 6 CW

  • Beta-Tester
  • 35461 battles
  • 13,827
  • [ATLUS] ATLUS
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012
Rule is working as intended. Carry on. 

http://www.theuselessweb.com/

 A. Guy on 02 June 2018 - 12:40 AM, said:

Destroyer of Tier 6 CW... says it all about you.


HoPeY_ #55 Posted 22 February 2020 - 12:35 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 104491 battles
  • 3,793
  • [DETOX] DETOX
  • Member since:
    01-20-2013

View PostRainbowAssassin, on 22 February 2020 - 11:23 AM, said:

As with all the stuff you and Jimmy talked about. Bias aside

 

Your tactic: Run risky, risking Technical defeats  for more games
Jimmy: Not running risky, playing it safe

 

Your result: Get technical defeat, despite admitting you are running it risky, 
 

 

Risk
/rɪsk/
noun
 
  1. a situation involving exposure to danger.
     
     

 

What do you know, the chance of "danger" happened and your complaining. Then you continue to say that your method is better, yet you are complaining about it at the same time, by running your strategy and "wrecked our whole campaign"

 

Please understand not everything in your bubble of a world works out.. You took a risk, it didn't work. The same goes for everyone else who did the same. Once again my clan had the same issues, we took risks for more games, we got double technical defeats on the second day, meaning we could only chip half the amount of battles for 3 days, thats a massive game changer. We took the consequence and adapted, moved on. I personally didn't know it was 9 instead of 8, until I saw your thread. It doesn't matter though.

 

First, if you knew it was 9, would you have chipped less games? NO. If you knew it was 9, would you have magically got an extra player online? NO. Because if you could just get someone else on, you would have got them on to make that 8 into a 9, to increase your chances of winning anyway.

 

Not knowing it was 9, made NO DIFFERENCE at all to the game plan. You are effectively rioting against a rule that was made, with no backing to the reason it should not be there. If you actually wanna make your time worth while, maybe complain that 9 is too hard and Asia is small? That might be a worth while discussion. Instead your battering on with "facts" like you cant read when, knowing about the rule would not have changed your situation. 

 

Umm, you aint getting this. I do not consider I'm chipping dangerously. In fact I've been playing it very safe. But carry on with your can't do wrong approach and reading shit into anything I do.

 

 

View PostRainbowAssassin, on 22 February 2020 - 11:24 AM, said:

Sorry, Ill help make a petition to Wargaming, that you should not have got a technical defeat because you have difficulty reading. 

 

Even if you did read 8, would it have mattered? You still got a technical defeat. Play by the rules everyone else plays by or go somewhere else.

 

You just don't get this apparently.



JS_NeedsAdultSupervision #56 Posted 22 February 2020 - 12:54 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 24864 battles
  • 115
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    09-25-2014

1 mark: M40/M43, T67
2 mark:
3 mark:

 

 

Currently 1 marking: M41 HMC
 

https://www.twitch.tv/js_____________


RainbowAssassin #57 Posted 22 February 2020 - 02:12 PM

    Apache Attack Helicopter

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 40741 battles
  • 2,148
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013

View PostHoPeY_, on 22 February 2020 - 03:35 PM, said:

 

Umm, you aint getting this. I do not consider I'm chipping dangerously. In fact I've been playing it very safe. But carry on with your can't do wrong approach and reading shit into anything I do.

 

 

 

You just don't get this apparently.

Ok, so you were chipping safe. You got a  technical anyway, which was unlucky. Why does a single person care that you got a technical though, everyone has the same rules. 

Once again:

View PostRainbowAssassin, on 22 February 2020 - 02:23 PM, said:

Not knowing it was 9, made NO DIFFERENCE at all to the game plan. You are effectively rioting against a rule that was made, with no backing to the reason it should not be there. If you actually wanna make your time worth while, maybe complain that 9 is too hard and Asia is small? That might be a worth while discussion. Instead your battering on with "facts" like you cant read when, knowing about the rule would not have changed your situation. 

 


 
Living in the wilderness as a unicum unicorn         

Tier 10 3 marks: IS-4, IS-7, T57 Heavy Tank, FV217 Badger, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, Object 140, Conqueror Gun Carriage, VK 72.01 (K), FV215b (183), Super Conqueror, Object 277, T-100 LT, Object 907, Jagdpanzer E 100, Bat.-châtillon 25 t, WZ 111 model 5A, FV215b, Centurion Action X, Object 430U, Type 5 Heavy, 60TP Lewandowskiego, T-62A, T110E4, E100, TVP T 50/51, OBJ. 260, T110E3, STB-1, FV4005 Stage II, T95/FV4201, M48A5 Patton, E 50 Ausf. M, 113, Strv 103B, Obj. 268 4, AMX 13 105, Panhard EBR 105, Foch 155

 


 

 


Twit_ #58 Posted 22 February 2020 - 04:27 PM

    69 Recognized

  • Member
  • 19671 battles
  • 290
  • [DUCKY] DUCKY
  • Member since:
    11-28-2017
I'm confused, if you read the rules, you would be aware of the minimum required to not tech... odd how you start this thread when you take a penalty on the first day.

RIP you I guess, keep us posted

The mindset you need to improve

 

 

WHY DO THEY CALL IT OVEN WHEN YOU OF IN THE COLD FOOD OF OUT HOT EAT THE FOOD 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users